SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL

SCI journal. Submitted December 17, the first review cycle took more than four months. In mid-April, I received the first opinions, and gave the paper 2 months of overhaul. There were 4 reviewers. They wanted more experiments, but after the experiments didn’t go smoothly, I applied for two extensions, which were granted for 2 months and revised for a total of 4 months, until July 31.The second review was still quite slow and it took more than three months. On October 17, I submitted my revisions. Three reviewers agreed to accept, but there was still a disagreement and I was told that I did not give the data the other reviewer wanted. So I revised it again for a period of three weeks. It was a very serious overhaul and the hard-working editor and the reviewer both looked at it. so although the data given was not satisfactory, our impression was still very good and I was given the opportunity for minor repairs. On November 8, the minor repairs were made and on November 10, it was submitted for review. On  November 13th, it was accepted. Waiting for those months was torment, the review process lasted nearly a year until my paper was finally accepted! Your patience and efforts will definitely pay off.

(6) Thank | Ellie W

This journal needs to wait for half a year.It is necessary to submit a draft early, and you must carefully consider the graduation.I feel that the editorial level of the journal is uneven, and the journal editors will send the second trial after the overhaul, and an article before the lab has been overhauled twice.

(1) Thank | 碳探

6.13 SubmissionSubmitted in early AugustFirst review in mid-October, two reviewers, more than a dozen questionsCompleted in late November2019.01.01 New Year's Day received a letter of acceptance New Year's gift one

(1) Thank | Ross

The journal has been very slow recently.After I selectd in January, I refused to make a change in February and re-submit it. After I selectd in March, I will not submit it until May. I have been stuck in the technical review for two months. Fortunately, editing Moos is very efficient and veryIt was submitted for trial, but the review was reviewed for more than two months.When I went to the meeting in July to meet the editor, I asked about the progress. After a short time, I received a major overhaul. I was overhauled for two months, and on October 20th, I was sent to the second trial. On November 10, I was acceptd.Overhaul editor The reviewer raised 20 questions, and wrote 27 pages on the light reply letter, so it was good to accept.I am anxious to use the article's small partner to select carefully, really slow

(1) Thank | 矜持

selectd for two manuscripts, one for more than eight months of tragedy, the other for four months and rejected, plusIt took more than a year to get up, the editorial department is extremely inefficient, and it is very irresponsible. This kind of journal will only eat its own consequences. The people who selectd have estimated that there are not many people who do not regret it. The so-called sensor articles are basically controlled by individual people in China.They are free to pour water and have a short review time, which is very unfair to most other people.This is my real experience!!!!!

(4) Thank | 达西

Overall, I am still satisfied. The first time I published an article, the first BB was rejected and transferred.6.12 Cast out, No. 8.28 to review comments, the two reviewers are minor repairs, reply No. 9.20, 10.29 notice, 10.31 notice, a total of 5 months before and after, although waitingIt’s hard to bear, but after all, the impact factor is not bad, and it can be tolerated in 5 months. In general, the journal is still slow. The article is accepted and it is said that if the rejection is still delayed for several months, it really wants to swear.Recently, my sister and sister selectd another one. Although the teacher suggested changing a journal, the teacher felt that the journal was not bad. Now I am waiting for the review comments, and I wish you good luck.

(1) Thank | qiyue

After four months of initial submission, the reviewer comments back to the reviewer. Both reviewers proposed amendments but the editor directly rejected the manuscript. After communicating with the editor, they agreed to re-attend. The result is more than one month or initial state.After sending the email, I sent the editor. After three days, the new editor refused. The reason is that the journal does not receive the article after the editor refused to re-submit, and a group of irresponsible editors, a group of procrastination staff, this journal will never beGoodbye

(258) Thank | nuanyang

First trial for four monthsOverhaul, return after 1 monthSending an external audit, the result is unknownThis journal is really slow now. The average of our team's submissions returned to the first review comments in three months.

(0) Thank | 机智的谷子

Submission for more than 2 months, has been submitted, speechless

(35) Thank | 鹤

Submitted for more than a month, always submit, writeTwo days after the letter, the editor said that the repetition rate was too high with his previous article.I have never encountered such a problem when the sentence was changed before, and now the requirements are more strict.

(4) Thank | xln

Innovative requirements are high, and there is an urgent need for innovation.

(2) Thank | JANEFOUR

Conscience suggestion, urgently send an article, do not worry about the article, carefully consider this journal, the service attitude is very poor, do not take you seriously, selectd for so long, no news, is rejectedThe manuscript is still a reviewer. It will be a bit more willing to give a message.In the end, it was rushed twice to give a rejection.It took me two months to get it. We have an article to graduate, why not refuse the draft early!I can select for something else, kiss!

(4) Thank | 像蚂蚁飞翔

Pothole, IWaiting for graduation.Actually reviewed for two months, refused after the draft, why not early!I am waiting for graduation, wasting my time

(3) Thank | 像蚂蚁飞翔

Submission for 4 months, the status is with editor, ask how to retract

(2) Thank | 123

I came to evaluate this journal objectively. In January, I submitted a draft for overhaul/re-entry in March, telling us that we were reviewed by the same reviewers. We returned to the revision in May and waited for nearly four months.In September, the result was rejected, and the editor was assigned to a new reviewer. From submission to rejection, after almost nine months, nine months of waiting for a rejection, I was really speechless.South Korean editors are seriously untrustworthy and waste other people's time. I personally admonish everyone, and carefully submit this journal, or regret it for life!!!It’s no exaggeration!!

(51) Thank | zzy

Received date: 23-1-2018Revised date: 19-7-2018Accepted date: 24-8-2018I gave two opportunities for overhaul, thank you very much for editing.Thanks to the reviewer for his tolerance!

(0) Thank | matt

selectd for two weeks, and the manuscript numbers were not given.Really speechless!

(0) Thank | Bai

Too slow, submitted in January of 18 years, revised once in May and submitted.There have been no results so far, and the results of the review.....too slow.If a graduate student needs to graduate and wait for a paper, it is not recommended to contribute to this journal.

(1) Thank | zhaoai@qq.com

6.12 submission, so far is submitted to journal...

(1) Thank | 354743504@qq.com

Speed ​​is slow, rejected

(0) Thank | 科研小白222

May 18th contribution, the middle has been submitted, yesterday (July 29th) only began under review

(0) Thank | 蔓蔓

June 13 selectd to Submitted to Journal.Feeling really slow, I hope to be a little faster later

(1) Thank | Bai

Submitted for two months, has been submitted, the editor stayed for two days, just under review, and will not select for this ghost journal!

(3) Thank | 花花

Submitted on May 6th, with editor on July 3rd, the status has not changed since July 24th, and it is very slow.Will not consider the journal in the future

(1) Thank | zzz

Too slow, 5/6/2018 select, now also submitted to journal

(0) Thank | LOW