X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES]Hello, you are Visitor Number 247205 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ POWER SOURCES
ISSN0378-7753
h-index262
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
14.402.1111.638
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Q17 / 162
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Q120 / 670
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Q15 / 216
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Q111 / 179

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)7.90%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/504093/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/POWER
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1976
Annual Article Volume1256
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0378-7753%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.8 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 6.5 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 25%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 2.2 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)
  Reviews on JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES: Write a review
Author: Louis_liu


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-05-13 20:54:00
January 31, 2019: Submission. February 2, 2019: Technical Modification. February 13, 2019: Submit to the journal. February 14, 2019: With editor. February 17, 2019: Under review. March 7, 2019: Under review (status data). March 28, 2019: Under editor's evaluation. March 29, 2019: Decision in process. March 30, 2019: Major revision (30-day period). April 27, 2019: Resubmission to the journal. April 27, 2019: With editor. May 3, 2019: Under review. May 8, 2019: Required reviews. May 13, 2019: Decision in process. May 13, 2019: Accept. The quality of the revised article has been greatly improved. I finally waited for the results today, and I have more confidence in my future scientific research, and the pressure of doctoral graduation is much less than before. Thanks to Stefano Passerini, the editor-in-chief, and the reviewers, and thanks to my girlfriend for her continuous care and love.

(30) Thank | Louis_liu

Author: daiviee


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-05-11 10:15:24
February 25, 2019, submitted to journal. February 28, 2019, with editor. March 1, 2019, under review. March 9, 2019, under editor evaluation. March 12, 2019, reject but suggest resubmit. Two reviewers, the first reviewer suggested major revision, but the second one rejected the manuscript incomprehensibly. April 11, 2019, resubmitted. April 13, 2019, with editor. April 16, 2019, under review. April 19, 2019, under editor evaluation. April 22, 2019, under editor evaluation. April 24, 2019, under editor evaluation. April 24, minor revise. There were four reviewers, the first reviewer suggested direct acceptance, and the other three reviewers suggested minor revision. On May 4, revision submitted. On May 6, with editor. On May 07, under review. On May 07, required reviews completed. On May 08, accept.

(3) Thank | daiviee

Author: SCUTWG


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-03-11 12:47:37
The editor and reviewers are very friendly. It is my first accepted paper. I am graceful. It took 4 months from submission to acceptance. With editor lasted one month. I guessed he was looking for the reviewers. It took one month for making the decisions for the first review. I was given one month to make major revision and supplement the experiments. I revised it for one month. It was reviewed for another month after submission, and then accepted. The following is the whole process, for your information. I submitted on September 30, 2018. The result returned on October 2, 2018, technical revision; I revised and resubmitted it on the same day. It was with editor on November 3, 2018, under review on November 6, 2018, and under editor evaluation on November 26, 2018. The result of first review came out on December 4, 2018, major revision, it was just one month. Revision submitted to the journal on December 29, 2018. It was sent back on December 31, 2018, and the editor asked to revise the highlights. Revision submitted to journal on December 31, 2018. It was under review on January 2, 2019. Required reviews completed on January 30, 2019. The decision of acceptance was made on February 2, 2019.

(148) Thank | SCUTWG

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-01 00:04:00
The cycle difference is really big. Our laboratory has submitted papers for the journal three times. One paper was accepted but two were rejected. I was told by other researchers that their review comments were returned very quickly, and there would be opinions in a month or so; however, the response was very slow in my experience. Indeed, as everyone said, the reviewers raised the issue of language. They recommended that I  find a native speaker. JPS is very fond of dyeing sensitized solar cells and quantum dot sensitized solar cells.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Eric Lee


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-01 10:41:36
2018.10.04 Submission2018.10.06 technical check, return on the same day2018.10.10 with editor2018.10.15 under review2018.11.25 under review(status date change)2018.12.09 Minor revision2018.12.13 Rework2018.12.14 with editor night under review2018.12.18 under review2019.01.01 AcceptIt’s three months before and after.For Power Sources, three months is already very fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(47) Thank | Eric Lee

Author: 20832


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-24 05:27:06
The reviewer has spent nearly two months, including three in the hands of the deputy editor (Yang Yong).In the week, the first trial was overhauled and the second trial was rejected.I wanted to report to the editor-in-chief and the deputy editor through the normal channels. The result was also approved by the deputy editor, saying that the method of our paper was too expensive and practical.In fact, our work has always been welcomed by the industry, and the work has been followed up, quoted (to carry today's H factor of 65), and many foresights have been confirmed.This submission was too disappointing and the most violent Christmas gift I received at the end of this year.
Show Review in Original Language
(14) Thank | 20832

Author: 2376


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-12 19:57:33
Submitted on April 8th, and now under review, the editor of the reminder in July said that one comment has come back, still looking for another reviewer, and the editorial reply is still in early September.Find a reviewer...Then I waited another month..Waiting to wait for the graduation is still under review...
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 2376

Author: 菜原子


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-08 07:43:29
At the beginning of April, it was still in the first instance after half a year, and it was not tempered.The result is unknown.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 菜原子

Author: Fly


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-07 10:37:52
Two articles were submitted, all of which were major repairs, minor repairs, and editorial rejections.The power of editing is too great.....
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Fly

Author: 哈哈哈哈


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-06 11:02:38
After reading everyone’s review cycle, I dare not select.........................
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 哈哈哈哈

Author: 2376


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-05 09:44:43
Submitted on April 8th, it is still under review for 5 months now. The review period is long. It is recommended to use the article urgently, and I hope to get a reply.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 2376

Author: Jun


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-31 09:23:42
2018.03.30 submit,2018.05.02 under reviewSo far, no news.In the middle of the mail reminder, sinking into the seaCool!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Jun

Author: 111


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-26 11:35:52
has been submiting for almost five months, and is still under review
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 111

Author: xuanzhishang


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-16 17:32:17
It has been two and a half months, and has been under review, urging a draft in the middle, sinking into the sea.I heard that there were no news for the insect friends for four or five months.Despair,,,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | xuanzhishang

Author: 音效好


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-30 14:35:08
Submitted on March 6th, under review after one weekThe review was about 3 months, and the arbitration was conducted once in the middle.On June 8th, it became under editor evaluation, and on June 23, I returned to the opinion, and the two repairs refused, and the editor gave it to the overhaul.On July 23rd, I will return to the revised manuscript. On July 29th, I will receive the editor
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 音效好

Author: 624474003@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-25 21:32:39
has been submitted for almost four months.With editor 4.9-5.6Under review 5.6 to present
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 624474003@qq.com

Author: rexyw


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-21 09:01:11
Fuel cell direction11/5/2018 with editor1/7 minor revision19/7 revision submit20/7 accept
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | rexyw

Author: 494553718@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-25 19:14:47
The submission was rejected after 2 months, and the revised re-introduction briefing was accepted for 1 month.When the second submission was made, the editor directly gave the previous two reviewers, so the speed was very fast.Thanks for your thanks!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 494553718@qq.com

Author: csu1990


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-04 16:29:13
I heard that if I will pass this year, I don’t know how, I’ll count the instant IF~7.1, I hope I can break 7, come on!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | csu1990

Author: chyxll


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-28 06:01:49
lasted for half a year and finally accepted...Submitted in December last year, more than one month to return to the revised comments, overhaul, in fact, there are two opinions, the overall feeling is good, the results did not answer well, return to a month, a reviewer is not satisfied, editors refused to draft, heartUnwilling, re-answering the reviewer's question, re-attending again, the editor gave the trial two weeks later, the previous reviewer had no comments, and returned to the other two reviewers' opinions. One thought it was good, a little adjustment was acceptable, oneI think that there is a problem with the starting point of the selection elements. They are all minor problems. The editors will give them a major repair. They will go back within two weeks and accept it one month later..After half a year, I finally accepted
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | chyxll

Author: 大胖胖


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-11 17:19:02
Four times for review, one refused to accept it directly, and the arbitration was rejected by the editor after the overhaul.The opinions were pertinent. After the overhaul, I selectd for other journals, hoping to save.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 大胖胖

Author: cys


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-05 16:55:35
33, and still with the editor...
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | cys

Author: chm_huangtz@ujn.edu.cn


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-22 07:12:08
20天了, has been in the with editor state
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | chm_huangtz@ujn.edu.cn

Author: 111


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-18 22:05:57
No results for one month and ten days
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 111

Author: Ice163


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-24 16:49:16
recently published an article about lithium battery cathode materials, personally feel that the journal's innovative requirements for the article and the systematic requirements of the experimental work is still quite high.The speed of reviewing journals is still quite fast, and it is generally possible to give letters in more than a month.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Ice163

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)

Start your review of [JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service