X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ELECTROCHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[ELECTROCHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 97673 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleELECTROCHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS
Journal Title AbbreviationsELECTROCHEM COMMUN
ISSN1388-2481
h-index174
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.401.2360.978
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Electrochemistry
Q15 / 37

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)4.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/601449/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/ELECOM
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10010-1710
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1999
Annual Article Volume223
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1388-2481%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.2 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 1.3 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 73%
Data from Elsevier: 15%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 2.1 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ELECTROCHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on ELECTROCHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS: Write a review
Author: 小白李小博


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-02-05 14:09:58
Ten days after submission, I received the review comments. There were four reviewers in total; one major revision, two minor revisions were required, and one rejection was received. The fourth reviewer made very demanding comments and insisted that we should supplement the experimental data that even a top journal would not require, and rejected the manuscript on the grounds of lack of innovation. After more than ten days of conscientiously supplementing the experiment, it was resubmitted, and the fourth reviewer’s concerns were especially explained in detail. More than ten days later, the review comments were received, and it was still the original four reviewers. There were three review comments returned. Because we seriously responded to the reviewers' comments, two reviewers agreed to accept it, but the fourth reviewer insisted on rejecting the manuscript because we did not add the experimental data he wanted. The editor finally adopted the fourth reviewer's opinion, although the rest of the reviewers agreed to accept it, and unfortunately, it was ultimately rejected. I am still quite disappointed, because the unreasonable request of the fourth reviewer was accepted by the editor and eventually led to rejection.

(8) Thank | 小白李小博

Author: Harry


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-09-14 00:03:17
The following is some submission experience about Electrochemistry Communications, which is for reference only. (1) The editing process was fast. Generally, a manuscript will be reviewed within a week. If the manuscript processing time was too long, the editor will not wait and send existing comments to the author. (2) The editor will carefully review each manuscript, and reject the manuscripts that do not meet the journal's requirements. But as long as the manuscript is sufficiently innovative, the editor will give relevant comments. In addition, the editor was also a reviewer. The editor's comments often combined the comments of other reviewers, such as citing literature, comparative experiments, opinion elaboration, sentence modification, adding appropriate data to support the controversial arguments in the text. These comments are very useful. (3) Be humble and cautious when responding to reviewers’ questions. However, it is important to make your point clear. Answer as few questions as possible, not too many. If the response is too long, the manuscript may be returned. (4) The article needs to be rigorous. Each sentence must have a basis. And appropriate references must be cited. (5) The introduction is very important. The reviewer will evaluate the innovation of the article from the introduction. (6) The emergency notice is the basis for the editor to evaluate the article, and the innovation of the article should be reflected in the emergency notice.

(3) Thank | Harry

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-31 00:11:00
Language requirements are high. Pay particular attention to all formatting requirements. 3 reviewers.

(4) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 南城百货


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-07 15:15:20
submission less than 6 hours.After the revision, I will select again. After two weeks, I will give comments on the review. After replying to the comments, I will wait for a week to receive
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 南城百货

Author: wwenf91@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-13 08:22:22
The journal is good, the editor in charge of energy direction in Canada is very responsible and more careful!(So ​​for content and language, it is recommended to first enrich, authentic point).I don't know a lot of things because of the novice, and the language process is more time consuming, but the real reply review comments take less than two weeks, which is quite fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | wwenf91@163.com

Author: Nat. Energy


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-04 03:57:27
classic journals in the field of electrochemistry.The review was quick, and the two rounds of review were returned in about 5 days. At present, the rejection rate is ~85%.2017.12.3 Instant IF=4.0, as always, stable.The review is very strict and the editor-in-chief will personally participate in the review.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Nat. Energy

Author: 58911112@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-26 14:33:13
Reviewer: A major repair, a minor repair, a medium repair.Edit the manuscript.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 58911112@qq.com

Author: egbert


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-06 09:16:28
dragged the article for a long time, finally submitted it on the EC, and returned 5 days after the select;Both reviewers agreed to publish immediately, and one proposed adding experimental details;Received the next day after the modification, Shen speed
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | egbert

Author: 王


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-10-24 17:16:44
The review speed is very fast.Half a month after the trial, it was a tragedy.Two review comments, editors rejected the draft.The requirement is still high.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 王

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-23 09:59:00
was submitted on the EC on September 22nd. The next day, the editor wrote back that the urgency criterion is not met, and said that the change of the text is more appropriate, and was directly rejected by the editor.Then, on September 26th, the short communication of the journal of power sources was changed. On October 22nd, minor repairs were made. The experiment and language were not modified. Only a few reviewers' articles were asked.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-12 09:52:00
was not published as the first author, and the third author published a review speed really fast as follows: Received 10.01.06Revised10.02.17Acceped 10.02.23On Line 10.03.01Publish 10.05.03 Feel as long as the work is novel, but must be very novel
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-03 09:10:00
5.30 submitted 6.6 first minor repair (one pass, two minor repairs)6.9 submitted 6.24 second minor repair (another pass, a minor repair) 6.27 select 7.3 receiving the overall calculation is very fast.The new requirements of the article are very high. It is best that the previous ones have not done it. The experiments such as improvement suggest that the journals should be selectd for. Of course, you can try the test. Some of the comments are good, and it will not waste time to recover.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-22 22:13:00
Editor has found 6 reviewers, five of whom are recommended to publish, and the sixth person is drafted.The editor-in-chief rejected the article.Nightmare general tragedy!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-16 15:07:00
thinks that the idea is relatively new, so I boldly selectd for EC, returned to the opinion in 8 days, but unfortunately was rejected, and returned to the reviewers' opinions. The speed is still very strong, praise one!Reviewer 1:While topic and the approach are highly interesting.I personally, would suggest the authors to revise the article and submit it elsewhere as a full paper (he has more opinions, if you want to answer one by one, the estimated length is not)
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-13 16:33:00
3Submission No.8, March 13Rejected, 5 days, don't waste the contributor for a minute.However, it is still not bad, at least after editing the level, returned a reviewer's opinion... Several questions are all stabbing...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-12 20:17:00
Recommended reviewers willUsed, even with two.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-19 20:22:00
has always respected this journal, thinking that it will not use the recommended reviewers, because the vast majority of the referees are generally acquaintances, but recently it has been recommended that many articles must be recommended.Good friend's manuscript, did not expect!A little disappointed with this journal!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-16 20:48:00
The first time I selectd for this journal, I gave the review comments two weeks later. Both agreed, and one reviewer suggested that I modify the topic to improve the attention.The day will be notified.Less than 20 days before and after, I was shocked by the efficiency of the EC. I have never seen such a fast journal, like one!The requirements for innovation are higher. I am doing the electrode material
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-12 09:41:00
. The review speed is fast, the editor is responsible, the requirements for innovation are high, and the requirements for data are generally
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-09 17:29:00
Received date: 14 September 2012Revised date: 29 September 2012Accepted date: 2 October 2012
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-05 13:05:00
This journal is very fast. My first article was reviewed for 20 days and rejected. The second article was reviewed for 8 days. Both reviewers said that they should make up.Data, add data after a few days, throw it, and receive it the next day.About half a month before and after.For innovation, material performance requirements are relatively high
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-20 15:02:00
06.01 submitted;06.06, number is assigned.06.19, rejected with 4 reviewers' comments: 2 favored the acceptance; another 2 rejected (1 even suggestedTo submit to general physical chemistry journal)
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-14 15:48:00
5.18 6.2 refusal, it is recommended to re-submit 6.6 after the modification and then select for 6.12 to receive a word: fast, of course, innovation is very important.I have selectd for two articles before, and I was directly rejected by the editor... I am very optimistic about this journal.However, there are many articles on lithium ion and fuel cells in the journal. It feels very general. It is estimated that it is the light of research hotspots...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-07 09:36:00
4 selectd on the 10th, after six daysTo the review comments, received on May 3.More than 20 days before and after.Speed ​​really fast
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-02 22:08:00
EC Classical journal in the field of electrochemistry, the efficiency is still very high!2012.3.11 Submission; 2012.3.26 Rehabilitation, two minor repairs, one overhaul; 2012.4.1 Release of revised draft; 2012.4.2 Received.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [ELECTROCHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service