X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

SENSORS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[SENSORS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 198419 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleSENSORS
Journal Title AbbreviationsSENSORS-BASEL
ISSN1424-8220
E-ISSN1424-3210
h-index132
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.000.6531.586
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Biochemistry
Q2156 / 407
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Instrumentation
Q117 / 129
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Analytical Chemistry
Q235 / 119
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Q146 / 183
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Information Systems
Q170 / 300
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Q1147 / 670

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)21.50%
Official Websitehttp://www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.mdpi.com/user/login/
Open AccessYes
PublisherMOLECULAR DIVERSITY PRESERVATION INTERNATIONAL-MDPI, KANDERERSTRASSE 25, BASEL, SWITZERLAND, CH-4057
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationSWITZERLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started2001
Annual Article Volume5528
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1424-8220%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher: 21.03 Day(s)
Data from Authors: About 1.7 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 80%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【SENSORS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)
  Reviews on SENSORS: Write a review
Author: cgdsss


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-08-26 10:22:19
2020/7/13 submit; 2020/7/14 assistant editor assigned; 2020/8/4 Revisions in Advance; 2020/8/17 major revisions; 2020/8/17 manuscript resubmitted; 2020/8/24 pending editor decision; 2020/8/25 accept. My review cycle should be very long. The paper was 32 pages long. It was in the robot navigation direction, with a long length. There were 4 reviewers, and the editor emailed to us on August 4, notifying us to revise the paper in advance based on the comments of the two reviewers, and wait for the other two reviewers’ comments. All three reviewers had quite good opinions and affirmed the work. One reviewer questioned the innovation, and this was refuted. The most hateful thing was that a reviewer asked me to cite 6 references. I read them and no one that was relevant to me, so I reluctantly cited two. In general, the process in Sensors is very formal, the reviewers are average, and the efficiency is quite high. The editor responds to emails within two hours and does not seem to work on weekends. I also published an article in IEEE Sensors J. There were only two reviewers, but they were more professional. Haha, with two papers in Q3 journals and being postponed for half a year, I finally graduated and got my doctoral degree.

(12) Thank | cgdsss

Author: 小玛过河


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-08-30 00:07:08
My situation was like this: Received date: 4 July 2019; Revised date: 24 August 2019; Accepted date: 26 August 2019; Published date: 28 August 2019. There was a rejection and resubmission was encouraged. All the comments of three reviewers were not simple. I revised it for a month and submitted it. Two of the reviewers were basically satisfied, and it didn't know whether the third review was still not satisfied or did not return the comments in time, In short, the editor added one more reviewer. As a result, it took one month and a half to get the result. It usually doesn’t take so long. The new reviewer said it was basically OK. The editor advised to make minor revision, and 5 days was given. It was accepted after the submission of revised manuscript. Let's say something about it. The submission experience was like a roller coaster ride. At the beginning, I though what I wrote was not bad, but unexpectedly, the reviewers raised a lot of comments that I didn’t expect. I was still worried about it even though I tried my best to revise it. But unexpectedly, it turned out to be minor revision, and it was accepted directly after revision was resubmitted. All the other aspects were good. Review and the process of other things were very fast, and the editor responded very promptly. My level was average, and I was relatively anxious, so I chose this journal. The comments of reviewers were still very helpful, and I feel that it is indeed much better than before. Well, thanks to the editors and reviewers. What’s more, MDPI has its own English editing service, which can be used if the article is considered by the reviewers to be unnatural.

(0) Thank | 小玛过河

Author: 海阔天空520


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-04-08 09:35:34
Submission on Feb. 24th; Major revision required on Mar. 16th. The two reviewers’ opinions were very professional. They asked a dozen questions, and the opinions were quite pertinent, requiring a frame adjustment of the paper. I spent nearly 10 days revising it and returned it for review. Revised submission on Mar. 25th. The second round of review comments received on Apr. 1st, requiring minor revisions. The reviewers were very satisfied with the revisions. They were very careful and even pointed out a wrongly spelt word. I revised and sent it back that day. Author's declaration, signatures, and biographies submitted on Apr. 2nd. Then it was accepted on Apr. 5th. Then paid 1,800 francs for proofreading on Apr. 5th-8th. The whole process is like this. It was really exhausting, and I even felt that my weight has dropped a bit. I think Sensors is really good, not only the service, but also the quality of the papers. I was planning to submit to MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (IF 4.3 Q1), but the review period is too long and it’s hard to wait. So, I firstly submit to Sensors as a guarantee, mainly because of its efficiency. I wonder if those people who belittled Sensors all the time are mentally problematic. They must have been knocked by rejections. If they don’t approve it, why do they submit? Sensors doesn’t beg you. If you have the ability, you can of course publish on Q1. That’s terrific. To be honest, there’re unqualified papers in every journal. Is there no unqualified paper in the top journal in mainland China? Never to mention the acceptance that only due to the qualifications of authors. Let's just spend our time on improving the paper. This is just my personal sharing!

(48) Thank | 海阔天空520

Author: abc


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-21 17:57:57
SCIE Journal. Some people say that the journal is slow. I just want to use my own paper as an example to other contributors. I have submitted in Sensors before and the speed is very fast. I have experienced the following process: review (20 days), overhaul (20 days), minor repairs, overhaul, minor repairs again, then  overhaul, refusal, and encourage to resubmit. Reviewers finally gave "the decision to the editor", the editor was afraid of offending the reviewer and gave the rejection. My feeling: The efficiency of editing is very high, and the reviewers are very serious, but not every reviewer is easy to deal with and editing decisions basically depend on the reviewer's opinion.

(16) Thank | abc

Author: QuietRoom


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-18 12:56:18
Very water There is no lower limit for reviewers. After all, OA recognizes money. Zhejiang University and Xijiao have not recognized this journal. It is estimated that there are still schools that do not recognize it.To the water as early as possible
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | QuietRoom

Author: 了卡介苗


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-28 21:03:37
January 2, 2019 ReceivedJanuary 22, 2019 Minior RevisonRevied on January 25, 2019January 28, 2019 AcceptedFiber Bragg Grating sensing, previously selectd oe, rejected, and then rewritten the article on oe's comments, and added experimental data and content, changed to sensors, 21 days to complete the review, 3 reviewers, a total of 13Some of the comments, some of which are repetitive, 9 of the actual opinions, the opinions are very professional, and the articles are improved a lot. After careful reform, they will return to the revised manuscript and accept it after 3 days. Because they have selectd oe before, they have already carried out the problem of oe.Modification, I thought the sensors were very watery, but the opinions of the three reviewers were very sharp and not easy to change.To add one more point, the sensor submission system can see the reviewer's score on each item of the article, a total of five, three reviewers gave a total of 14 highest points, one can be improved.Therefore, even if the articles of sensors are very sharp, the recruitment rate is still very high. The same review comments, other journals must be overhauled.Personally feel that the journal review is not water, but the employment is very water, almost the same article can be recorded, after the minor repair will not return to the reviewer, directly edit the decision
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 了卡介苗

Author: 博物


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-28 11:02:21
Received: 16 October 2018 /Revised: 18 November 2018 /Accepted: 20 November 2018 /Published: 23 November 2018 /12800 version of the face fee, received more than 30 days, the three reviewers are minor repairs, add up to 10 questions, the problem is more moderate
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 博物

Author: 哈库纳


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-05 09:25:31
The review comments are very professional and the feedback is very fast.awesome!
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 哈库纳

Author: Leaf


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-16 21:31:44
Very fastReceived Date 25 May 2018Revised Date 26 June 2018Accepted Date 30 June 2018Published Date 3 July 2018Submission to First Decision (Days) 34Submission to Publication (Days) 38Round of Revision 1
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Leaf

Author: sensors


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-05 17:28:08
Compared with IEEE sensors journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | sensors

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-19 14:54:20
this issue is really fast.Fast speed itself is a price drop in any field.Just like chasing girls.Things are rare.
Show Review in Original Language
(26) Thank | Anonymous

Author: syq19881012@126.com


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-18 10:12:30
is very fast and has a professional review.Is the Sensors partitioned in the latest CITIC area?(Instrumentation direction)
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | syq19881012@126.com

Author: 嘿嘿嘿


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-27 14:37:40
I have read many SCI comments in this field. There are many negative comments in this journal. If there are no negative comments on other journals, the water will be water. After all, it is an SCI.It is also necessary to emphasize that it is really unnecessary. SCI also has three or six, etc.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 嘿嘿嘿

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-26 09:51:46
Those who are sour, are afraid that they don’t have paper in the field!In addition to the review of the journal, this journal has no water release compared to similar journals in the second district.I have selectd for 4 articles and only one has been acceptd.One of the previous three articles did not belong to this field and was directly rejected.The other two were indeed bruised.The last one I revised for half a year, directly minor repairs, but also gave a straightforward comment, I discussed with 20 other emails and other authors to modify.
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 111


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-25 13:09:12
This journal can't be water anymore, so many people selectd, 唉
Show Review in Original Language
(12) Thank | 111

Author: Goldendays


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-24 15:39:47
submitted a special issue related to the magnetic sensor, and think that the article itself has good innovations and experimental results.The three reviewers, two very positive, are equivalent to no questions, the third asked eight questions, more professional, but not difficult to answer, wrote four pages to reply.The second round of editors should only send the reply to the third reviewer. After one week, the answer is no problem, they can be published, and the publishing process is quickly completed. Online, from submission to publication for 34 days.I was very lucky to have published the article for the first time without experiencing too many twists and turns.I hope I can send a better article in the future!Come on, everybody.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Goldendays

Author: 123


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-06 23:44:59
The editor is very responsible, and the reviewer's review comments are very professional and useful. After a round of overhaul...
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 123

Author: fengyu lin


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-06 20:47:09
3 reviewers, two minor repairs, the first reviewer asked 20 questions, repaired two rounds, the problem is very detailed, the article improved a lot.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | fengyu lin

Author: 。。


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-05 10:48:10
open sourceWater journal
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 。。

Author: 我


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-04 21:32:29
I regret this select, and I receive spam every day after I submitted it!!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 我

Author: 问道者


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-02 21:02:05
Submitted on June 11th, minor repair on June 27th, repaired on June 29th, and received on July 2nd (June 30th and July 1st are Saturday and Sunday)), is the fastest journal I have ever seen, submitted to receive 21 days!The second SCI during the master's degree.I hope everyone has to help.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 问道者

Author: Hey


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-27 11:49:24
2017 Impact Factor 2.475
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Hey

Author: AL Peter


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-22 01:42:29
Three reviewers, two opinions are very sharp, it seems to be a big cow in the field, think that it is innovative, and according to the overhaul opinion, the experimental part is added to the proposed method.Detailed comparison and explanation, but the second reviewer directly rejected the manuscript in the second trial because the revised content did not meet his requirements, and he added a few more comments.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | AL Peter

Author: FollowYourHeart


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-21 11:16:35
5.12 submitted6.1 major revision6.18 acceptedJust doing research can select for such 3,4 district texts, OA or non-OA don't care too much, OA is not water, OA also has top issuesA total of three reviewers are experts in the field. The two reviewers are very targeted and a little stroked. In general, the article is very helpful.Recently, the rejection rate of the journal has risen a bit, and several rejections around it may control the employment rate.But as long as the workload, innovation is enough, the problem is not big
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | FollowYourHeart

Author: knightlu


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-20 10:28:30
After the invitation, contribute a total of threeThe reviewer, the first trial is very fast, the results within 20 days, received within 40 days, the editing efficiency is also very high; but the level of reviewers is uneven, obviously not as good as some old journals, there is a reviewer's review commentsThe level is so low that we are stunned, and the level of ordinary graduate students is not.It is recommended that if there are beautiful results or high-quality journals, this water is still possible. After all, the speed is fast and the impact factor is not low.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | knightlu

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)

Start your review of [SENSORS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service