My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA]Hello, you are Visitor Number 298791 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Journal Title AbbreviationsELECTROCHIM ACTA
ISSN0013-4686
h-index211
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.261.3651.081
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Electrochemistry
Q13 / 31
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemical Engineering
Q118 / 272

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)11.10%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/205/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/electacta/
Open AccessNo
PublisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyBiweekly
Year Publication Started1959
Annual Article Volume2122
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0013-4686%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.9 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 90%
Data from Elsevier: 30%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 3.4 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)
  Reviews on ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA: Write a review
Author: andersonyi@613.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-06-22 15:00:36
3 reviewers. High requirement for innovation. Be very detailed and careful in your replies.

(0) Thank | andersonyi@613.com

Author: Anjun Hu


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-30 09:50:51
Just received an EA, minor repair, received the same day after the select, and published online the third day.Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013468619301902Title: Three-dimensional CoNi2S4 nanorod arrays anchored on carbon textiles as an integrated cathode for high-rate and long-life Lithium−Oxygen battery
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anjun Hu

Author: 迷失之城


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-15 17:33:30
8.29 submitted to the journal9.2 under review (I am very happy to send the review, I have rejected several 2 districts before being rejected)10.2 under editor evaluation10.2 revise (two reviewers, one six, one five questions, not too difficult, mainly to answer questions and quote references
 Dedicated to the main, supplement 2 experiments, all given overhaul)10.26 submitted to the journal (it is not easy to change, mainly because there is a problem that needs to measure eis after 200 laps)10.26 under review (2 hours after submission, it will be submitted for review, the editor is really awesome!)11.12 Required reviews completed11.15 acceptThanks to the reviewer, thanks to the editor Rüdiger Kötz, Dr. Thanks to the teacher for the modification, thanks to the lab teacher Shimei
Show Review in Original Language
(15) Thank | 迷失之城

Author: 迷失之城


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-12 19:51:30
Reworked for 16 days, or under review I hope that the editor will receive it. Waiting for the doctor to apply
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 迷失之城

Author: 迷失之城


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-04 20:01:36
8.29 Submitted to the journal9.2 under review (I am very happy to send the review, I have rejected several 2 districts before being rejected)10.2 under editor evaluation10.2 revise (two reviewers, one six, one five questions, not too difficult, mainly to answer questions and quote references
 Dedicated to the main, supplement 2 experiments, all given overhaul)10.26 submitted to the Journal (it is not easy to change, mainly because there is a problem that needs to measure EIS after 200 laps)10.26 under review (2 hours after submission, it will be submitted for review, the editor is really awesome!)11.4 under review (Returning for 10 days has no results, just hope to receive it earlier, after all, graduate this year, the third article, waiting for the doctor to use it!)I hope I can receive, pray for blessings, and pick up the character. I hope my information can help others!
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | 迷失之城

Author: rezheng2009


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-04 21:21:27
Contribution to No. 5.29 of 20186.6 for reviewReturn to opinion on No. 26.26, a major repair, a minor repair, the editor will return after the modification of 7.267.24 return, carefully revised the comments of the first person, in fact, very good change,The second person ran a train full of five questions, most of which were not related to the paper, or carefully explained;7.27 waiting for editing message8.24 accept
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | rezheng2009

Author: 123


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-01 19:55:30
4.27 Submission7.2 Return to the opinion, a minor repair overhaul7.26 Modifying responsesI look forward to a good result...
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 123

Author: rzzheng2009


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-27 22:20:30
Contribution to No. 5.29 of 20186.6 for reviewReturn to opinion on No. 26.26, a major repair, a minor repair, the editor will return after the modification of 7.267.24 return, carefully revised the comments of the first person, in fact, very good change,The second person ran a train full of five questions, most of which were not related to the paper, or carefully explained;7.27 is waiting for the edit message
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | rzzheng2009

Author: 763764784@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-21 11:21:18
First throw jps, tragedy after 15 days.Then submitted ea1 month for review comments, three reviewers for one, one for four questions, one for 16 questionsThe modification was quite smooth and was thrown out after 7 days.Then I waited for 15 days. The second revision is the old iron of 16 problems. I am doing a positive electrode material and let me go to shoot Li dendrites.Fortunately, Tsinghua has a frozen field launch, and the appointment has been waiting for 8 days...After 10 days, the second repair was made.After 12 days accept2 months and 15 days before and afterNow do a certain kind of material can no longer pay attention to individual things, to have a system awareness, cheer friends ~
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | 763764784@qq.com

Author: xiefengyan517@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-20 11:34:27
Submitted for six months, no news, crying.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | xiefengyan517@163.com

Author: 1050093907@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-11 10:30:36
After receiving the draft, I received the review comments one month later.After a long wait for two months, I received the
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1050093907@qq.com

Author: 浅浅and蓝蓝


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-03 10:29:27
2.21 Submitted to the Journal2.21 With Editor3.13 Under Review3.27 Under Editor Evaluation4.15 Revise5.10 April Submitted to Journal5.20 Under Review6.20 Revise6.25 Revision Submitted to Journal7.02 AcceptEditor: Aicheng Chen, PhD.It took about five months to include it. In general, I would like to thank Dr. Chen.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 浅浅and蓝蓝

Author: houhuilin86@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-24 19:02:16
The first EA in life, submitted for 40 days to receive review comments, one overhauled a rejection, the editor gave a chance to re-submit, we added to the reviewer's commentsThe experiment, carefully answering each question, re-submited in EA ten days later, and soon sent it to the reviewer, or sent it to the reviewer who refused the draft. After a long forty days of waiting, the review comments returned, this reviewThe person was very satisfied with the manuscript we revised. We only raised one question and minor repairs. We responded quickly and returned on the same day. The editor directly accepted it three days later.Thanks to the editor of Sotiris Sotiropoulos, the people are very good, and thanks to the help of the reviewers, the paper has been greatly improved.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | houhuilin86@163.com

Author: 764919513@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-20 19:30:30
Three months after the submission, the results of the preliminary examination were given. A minor repair was overhauled, and it was repaired after one month. The third day was directly accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 764919513@qq.com

Author: ztghjs


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-20 19:29:07
Three months after the submission, the results of the preliminary examination were given. A minor repair was overhauled, and it was repaired after one month. The third day was directly accept.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ztghjs

Author: 打屁屁


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-20 13:43:14
Two reviewers, one refused a major repair.Many opinions are also very pertinent.Although there is a suspected shabu-shabu, I still want to vomit the person who refused to draft the man. I personally feel that he may be in the direction of the lithium battery. Basically, he does not see the analysis of other batteries, so he refused to submit the manuscript.I am really convinced of the overhaul opinion, and it is very valuable, but I have nothing to say about rejecting the draft.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 打屁屁

Author: cyxlll


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-24 22:51:35
Lithium battery positive, three reviewers, the first reviewer compares two, let me make up the synchrotron radiation experiment, think that the coating amount is low, to increase the coating amount to 10-20%, rejected.The second and third reviewers gave a firm opinion on the paper.The editor directly ignores the first reviewer and may be more optimistic about my article, saying that let me pay attention to the first reviewer.After repairing it a month later, I thought it would be submitted for trial. I didn't expect to give it to the editor directly.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | cyxlll

Author: cyxll


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-24 10:41:09
very efficient, submitted to return comments for about 25 days, 3Reviewer, 1 refused, 2 repaired, edited to repair.The problem is relatively pertinent, and I am going back after a month. I thought it would be sent to the trial. I didn’t expect to accept the
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | cyxll

Author: dadada


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-14 13:35:36
5 reviewers, one reviewer said the article is very good,Each of them raises some questions, one of which is compared with other documents. The other two require explanation in detail. There are not many problems, but the last one is directly rejected. The reason is that there is no innovation.Then gave a bunch of unfounded guesses, and the result was edited to refuse... I don’t understand where some of the reviewers are now, Xinsai
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | dadada

Author: dadada


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-14 13:35:15
5 reviewers, one reviewer said the article is very good, and each has some questions, one of which requiresCompared with other literatures, the other two explanations in the article require explain in details. There are not many problems. They are minor problems, but the last reviewer directly refuses. The reason is that there is no innovation, and then a bunch of themselves are given.According to the guess, the result editor refused... I don’t understand where some reviewers are now, Xinsai
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | dadada

Author: happy


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-07 17:18:00
The next day, the submission will be submitted immediately, and the review will be about 40 days, two reviewers.A direct rejection of the manuscript, but did not put forward any constructive opinions, do not understand why the direct rejection, the second person minor repair, the editor directly rejected the draft....
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | happy

Author: CUMT-M*P


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-29 17:05:01
Electro Acta, the journal grade is good, one of the three old and authoritative journals of electrochemistry, the review speed is fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | CUMT-M*P

Author: LLG


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-21 09:24:20
Immediate impact factor on the station 5.0,Properly not falling
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | LLG

Author: 123


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-08 12:11:40
1.13 Submission2.11 Review draft reply overhaul3.10 Modifying the reply4.4 ReceivingThe speed is still relatively fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 123

Author: kadin


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 9.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-22 20:41:56
ELECTROCHIM ACTA Taikeng, the review speed is too slow, an article dragged nearly oneIn the year, the scholarship was also missed. I want to cry without tears
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | kadin

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)

Start your review of [ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy