E-POLYMERS

This journal is extremely slow in terms of the review process. The editor is also very unresponsive, and as result you never know the status of your manuscript nor get any answers to your questions. After waiting 7 or 8 months, we suddenly received an email from the editor indicating that our paper had been rejected. Don’t submit to this journal.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Cast on July 27Review comments on August 15Revised on August 22Received on the same dayToo fast!

(1) Thank | wang

is really much faster now, one month in a trial, 15 days in overhaul to give results, half-day after receiving a small repair

(1) Thank | @_y

I am coming to name it!One month after the first trial, the review was overhauled, and three reviewers were submitted; after 3 days of completion, they were submitted and received directly after 16 days.Said that it is slow, really do not understand!The innovation of my thesis is really general, but the writing is very serious. The figure is still quite good. The editor is very nice. The reviewer said that the innovation is not enough to give the opportunity to overhaul.Finally, I hope everyone can also be in the air.

(1) Thank | ou

After changing the publishing house, the manuscript processing speed is now OK.

(0) Thank | polymer

This journal is super slow, last year selectd in June, there has been noAs a result, during the period, the boss sent three emails, and did not return at one time. When he was preparing to change his submitment in mid-June this year, he suddenly received a minor comment.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Garbage journal, all for a few months, there is no news

(0) Thank | Anonymous

for two days, and even an automatic reply email has not been received, proWhat, what?I am still waiting for graduation. After reading this link, I feel that the review speed is fast, and it is easier to select... http://emuch.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=981254

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage: http://www.e-polymers.org/index. ... ntpage&Itemid=1

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2010 selectd in March, given in September 2011The revised opinion, now almost 3 months, still did not give news.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submission at the end of April, returning comments in November, revised, online publication July 31 (second year)

(0) Thank | Anonymous

garbage journal Chinese irrigation place

(0) Thank | Anonymous

07After submiting in an article, catch up with a reviewer, but the review is very slow, and more than 3 months to reply to Xiaoxiu, in fact, there is only one picture that needs to be changed into an illustration, upload it immediatelyAfter another 5 months to receive, ONLINE is slower, more than 1 year, the impact factor is getting lower and lower, a bit bad, it is best not to select

(0) Thank | Anonymous

when I was one, I selectd for one.I didn't hope, I came to review the comments after 5~6 months, and after I replied seriously, I was notified.The first SCI, although the journal's evaluation is very low, is also called rotten journal, but still very excited.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The impact factor of this journal has gradually declined in recent years. From the original 1 point to the current 0.6 or so, the review period has gradually extended, from 2-3 months from the beginning to 6 months later, and myThat article has dragged on for a whole year. Overall, the hit rate is still very high!If you are lucky, there is probably only one reviewer!!

(0) Thank | Anonymous