X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

BIOMACROMOLECULES

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[BIOMACROMOLECULES]Hello, you are Visitor Number 68547 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleBIOMACROMOLECULES
Journal Title AbbreviationsBIOMACROMOLECULES
ISSN1525-7797
E-ISSN1526-4602
h-index193
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
10.601.6891.278
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Polymers and Plastics
Q17 / 158
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Materials Chemistry
Q117 / 292
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Biomaterials
Q112 / 106
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Bioengineering
Q120 / 148

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)7.40%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.acs.org/journal/bomaf6
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://acs.manuscriptcentral.com/acs
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER CHEMICAL SOC, 1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20036
Subject AreaChemistry
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyBimonthly
Year Publication Started2000
Annual Article Volume427
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1525-7797%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.5 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 33%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【BIOMACROMOLECULES】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on BIOMACROMOLECULES: Write a review
Author: Hydration


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-05-17 07:39:27
Two major revisions and two minor revisions were required, and it was accepted after revision. This journal has high requirements for material characterization, but not for animal experiments.

(8) Thank | Hydration

Author: 材化生环占三


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-03-14 20:25:14
This journal is really good. One month after submission, the comments of review were given, and major revision was required. One of the reviewers required major revision and the other two required minor revision. I spent one week for reply; it was accepted on the third day. It was really fast. However, the reviewers’ comments were very professional, and the questions were detailed. The requirements of the innovation were high, and the part of mechanism should be especially explained. In short, I often read the submission experience on this website, and finally I can give back to everyone, I hope it helps.

(6) Thank | 材化生环占三

Author: tan hu


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-12-29 20:34:53
This journal is very good. The manuscript is my first paper in the field of chemistry. One and a half months later I received the review comments, one major revision and one minor revision, and no additional experiment were required. I returned it after 7 days of modification. It was accepted 2 days later, and directly online on the same day. Hope the journal gets better and better.

(2) Thank | tan hu

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-22 16:31:00
I recently submitted a draft to Biomacromolecules, and unfortunately it was rejected. After I received the notification, I heard that, as long as there is a reviewer rejecting the manuscript, your paper will not be accepted. This is probably the case for many articles, but it’s odd if 4 of 5 reviewers recommend the article for acceptance and it’s rejected based on the minority. Be cautious in submitting to this journal.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: tom.huangtong@gmail.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-05-11 15:47:35
initial submitment, one month after the whole revised comments.One of the reviewers felt that my research should not be a journal.Personal estimates may be accepted because their research experiments are still novel.The reviewer is very strict and has given many revisions.A total of three reviewers gave me a review of the paper.Although there is a one-month modification time (can be extended by consultation with the editor), in order to show sincerity, it has been resubmitted in half a month.Notify for accept after one week.Overall, the journal is highly efficient and the innovation requirements of the article are not low.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | tom.huangtong@gmail.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-18 23:28:00
The article was submitted out at the end of July, and the review comments were received after one and a half months.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-11 14:14:00
6 On the 25th of the month, the company received the revised opinion on August 23, a minor repair, and the score was higher.Another reviewer provided a lot of constructive comments on the biological representation, suggested overhaul, revised comments on September 4, and received on September 6.Overall, the article may need to have a certain degree of novelty, and your second SCI can be accepted, very honored!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-03 14:34:00
contributed 53 days, still no news, anxiously waiting for
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-01 16:57:00
this journal must first MACROMOLECULES, molecular structure and performance should be clearly defined, nuclear magnetic should be in accordance with the normCome; then BIO, now it is acceptable at the cellular level; finally, there must be some novelty in integration.The review manuscript is still very fast, if is also good, it is worth a select
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-12 12:04:00
review period is about one and a half months, three reviewers, one directly accepted, two minor repairs.Received on the third day after returning, you can download it online immediately.The degree of innovation in this journal's innovation and journal must be high, and each reviewer is to score, remember!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-28 17:20:00
Submitted for 3 weeks with news, two reviewers.One reviewer has a high evaluation, another reviewer has a very low evaluation, and the evaluation content is extremely abnormal. It is estimated that he has encountered competitors, lacking a basic objective and fair position, and the evaluation content is not praised, but it is not reasonable.The consistency of content and journal positioning is very low, which is too much. I think that if my job is not suitable for this journal, I really don't know if it is suitable for that.So, I had to walk away silently, change it.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-18 11:22:00
3 On March 13th, I was rejected on April 16th. I am doing the polysaccharide structure. The reason is too specific.Magazines in this wide range may be too few readers, so it is recommended to switch to the journal on carbohydrate.Two reviewers, one is this opinion and the other is accept after minor revision.However, the editor still prefers the opinions of the first reviewer.Sad reminder, and now reflect on it, it may be that the article does not mention the word biomacromolecules.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-26 08:39:00
Submitted for one month, two major changes, edited by Dr. Simona PercecRefused.It is very difficult to have innovative requirements for manuscripts!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-26 16:53:00
ACS journal, the quality has not been said, the layout is beautiful, due to the biological correlation, the impact factor has risen very quickly in the past two years.Innovation must be high.I selectd for one, the first two reviewers, one minor repair, one gave a positive opinion, considered it meaningful, but refused.The editor-in-chief gave the refusal. After a month of argument, the editor-in-chief asked to return it and received it after the minor repair.Therefore, the rejected worms must not be discouraged. If you feel that the reviewer is biased in the evaluation, you must make an argument. In fact, the editor is most afraid of others.If you have fun, don't forget to give points~
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-10 00:35:00
The speed of reviewing is still very fast. The reviewer comments will be given in one month. The five reviewers will write 12 pages in response to the revised comments. They are going crazy. After submitting the revised comments, one week.Direct reception, in general, the reviewer is very serious, the review comments are very pertinent, the journal is efficient,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-08 08:21:00
review speed is still very fast, more than 20 days to give advice.One overhaul and one reception, the editor said that he looked down and felt that the content was a bit narrower than the journal, and refused. In the rejection letter, it was also mentioned that the number of submissions of recent journals increased, and the amount of rejections was relatively high.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-19 09:36:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-30 09:54:00
I selectd for one, three reviewers, all of whom said they wanted to modify, but the editor refused. Later, according to the revised opinions,I selectd again, I agreed to it in two weeks, and then I published it directly~ I feel that the editor is also quite nice~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-29 02:52:00
2010 is 5.325
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-09 16:57:00
just submitted an article, I hope not to be rejected, bless
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-03-31 18:02:00
editor is very nice, reviewers are very strict. 21 days initial review reply. Two direct reception, 1 overhaul.After a week of revision, I selectd for the first time in English SCI, and the format was not understood. I made a mistake. After 30 hours, I edited and wrote a letter, gave some notes, and gave the opportunity to re-attend. After two days of modifying the format, I submitted it.After the second trial, it was officially accepted after 5 days. After 7 days, the proof was
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-03-24 11:06:00
This journal is not good. It has not been selectd twice. The review period is 41 days, and both are 41 days.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-02-24 19:04:00
Just submitted out, pray, @@@@@@杯具, said that it is not related to the topic of the journal@@@@@@@
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science材料
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-02-10 13:32:00
efficiencyVery high, the editor is very serious
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science材料
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-01-27 13:07:00
feels very efficient about a month or so to give reviewers three reviewers, all of which are modified after a week of returning to return a day after receiving a very efficientIF=5.325(2010)
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [BIOMACROMOLECULES]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service