X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 52733 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePOLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
Journal Title AbbreviationsPOLYM DEGRAD STABIL
ISSN0141-3910
h-index139
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.000.9251.503
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Polymers and Plastics
Q113 / 158
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Mechanics of Materials
Q137 / 377
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Materials Chemistry
Q131 / 292
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Condensed Matter Physics
Q147 / 411

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)11.70%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405941/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/PDST
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaChemistry
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1979
Annual Article Volume309
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0141-3910%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.9 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 5.8 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 71%
Data from Elsevier: 26%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 4.8 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY: Write a review
Author: Hookie


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-03-04 17:14:11
Initial date submitted: 2019.12.16; Under editor evaluation: 2020.1.13; Major revise: 2020.1.19. There was only one reviewer who raised 4 questions, which were relatively easy to answer. Revise submitted: 2020.2.27; Accept: 2020.3.3. It took 78 days in total, and the process was smooth. The editor was professor Tadahisa Iwata from the University of Tokyo, who processed the manuscripts quickly, and he was nice. It was special time and I can’t return to school to do experiments. It is a great pleasure for me to have this article accepted smoothly.

(24) Thank | Hookie

Author: dc hu


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-09-26 17:26:15
Submission on June 16th. With editor on June 18th. I can’t remember the exact time, and just remember that the status of under review was displayed for around 40 days. August 5th, minor revision, a reviewer. The question was very professional and let me add some data. The revised manuscript was submitted on August 11, and it became under review next Monday (The editor I met processed the manuscript on Monday night the first few times); on September 17th, I realized that it had been a month since the minor revised version returned. Therefore, I sent an email reminder; on September 18, the editorial assistant replied in a procedural manner that the reviewer had not returned comments yet. It was accepted on September 26th. I hope it will be helpful to everyone.

(61) Thank | dc hu

Author: zhhyang753@sohu.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-12 20:36:00
I submitted to two other journals before coming to this one. I used a translator for this submission, and it was helpful b/c I did not encounter language issues. Note: your paper must be well written and have pretty signigicant innovation to be accepted.

(1) Thank | zhhyang753@sohu.com

Author: lcc52199


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-21 18:02:37
Two or three days after the submission with the editor, the afternoon afternoon review, processing quicklyHowever, the first trial was long, nearly three months, a total of 80 days, overhaulA reviewer, there are not many problems, but there are many places to be modified.Seriously revised ten days to submit, received after half a month, the editor ignored the comments of the reviewer's language minor repair.I used to read comments frequently, I received it, and I also wrote a letter, swearing.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | lcc52199

Author: 半夏浅凉


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-18 09:53:20
Submitted on May 2ndJuly 15 minor repairAmendment submission on August 13Received on September 17thI don't understand why Xiao Xiu has to wait so long to receive
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 半夏浅凉

Author: 243628875@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-12 06:58:53
Submitted in February, overhauled in March, seriously repaired for one and a half months, and repaired in April.After another month of trial, he gave a minor repair. After two days of repair, he returned to receive it in June.Overall soon
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 243628875@qq.com

Author: 1376123745@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-07 19:47:58
20171016Turn out, give a minor revision opinion after 45days, a reviewer.After the week of repair, the editor accepts it directly.The editor is Tadahisa Iwata of the University of Tokyo, Japan, very nice!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 1376123745@qq.com

Author: quillwang@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-07 21:55:38
should be edited by the pro-trial, all kinds of disgusting, after the overhaul, half a month acceded, overall very quickly.The first article.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | quillwang@163.com

Author: 我爱米米


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-06 21:01:24
Two reviewers, suspecting that one of them is an editor, are big cows, and made many suggestions, which also benefited me a lot.Submission in mid-July, overhaul at the end of September, rehabilitated at the beginning of October, and received in early NovemberI have always felt that this journal is quite tall, and I have finally got one of them. I am very happy.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 我爱米米

Author: Sukie


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-10-27 10:37:54
This journal really scared me. I started the trial with the editor for half a month. The under review came back for half a month. The editor stayed for another half a month, then refused.The rejection rate is high. I also recommend two papers to look at. Three reviewers, two minors, willing to accept, another abnormal review, completely negating my thesis, very angry, various doubts,The feeling of obvious intimidation, a lot of opinions were written and said that this is not the case, it is not good, hey, unlucky.However, the editor also said that it is OK to re-attend after the revision. I am really scared.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Sukie

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-20 22:54:00
In June, I told the reception today.A total of two major overhauls, in fact, mainly grammatical problems, because elsevier has a high language requirements, so it was repaired once, and the editor is obviously intimidating, and only the refinement company is pleased to help.The journal requires something to be more innovative, followed by language.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-13 10:15:00
I also selectd for the front end time, with the editor is almost half a month, I do not know how!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-22 16:46:00
is very slow, all with editor for a month, who knows what this is, need to send a letter
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-30 18:14:00
submitted an article about rubber agingThe article has been received, but the speed of review is not generally slow, reminded once, and then sent a review opinion, received according to the revised comments.Reviewing the manuscript for more than 3 months, modifying one month, waiting another month, then receiving, the overall cycle: 6 months.Slow down.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-16 23:13:00
spent one month in the editor's hand, sent an email reminder three times, the first two did not respond, the third time after the past, the next day refusedAnd said that the direction does not match!!?If you don't match it, you still watched it for a long time. I urged it twice and didn't say it. After more than a month passed, I said that the direction did not match??!!This slow speed is worthy of an average review period of 1.9 months!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-10 13:11:00
submitted a resin degraded dissolution material and submitted the grammar error soon after the submission. However, it is still a pity that it was rejected by the editorial department. The processing time is very fast, a few days later.Giving the message
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-10 09:20:00
looks like the review speed is not as fast as before, with editor for two weeks, under review for more than a month, there is no news yet
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-11 08:12:00
POLYM DEGRADSTABIL2.594- 3.019, Impact 5-Year
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-25 00:38:00
PDS is the best journal for aging degradation of polymer materials. It is not very high in aging and degradation, so this journal is very authoritative.I selectd for an article on the aging mechanism of SBR. I simply studied the aging process. I was asked by the reviewer. I was very professional. The reviewer comments wrote me 12 pages. The infrared peaks are all specific to a reference.Which paragraph?But the whole revision has been very helpful to myself.So do the traditional aging degradation research before the submitment to do enough.Relatively speaking, it is easy to make biodegradable materials.In short, a journal whose influence is greater than its impact factor will not fall if it does not go up.A thorough study of mechanism studies is still easy.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-11 22:14:00
Degradation of polymer materials, the effects of recovery were evaluated from physical, chemical and mechanical aspects.Submission under view One week, required reviewer completed 2 weeks.2 reviewers.Put forward some minor problems that are not serious.All are directly accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-09 12:38:00
has submitted a cup, the editor and reviewer said that no degradation data does not meet the scope of the journal, and it has been changed for half a year. I finished the degradation and then rewritten it.Related articles, I gave it to Xiao Xiu after one month of submitteding. I received it after 2 days of repair. The article in the first article is really twists and turns. I like the high efficiency of Japanese editors.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-11 12:51:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-12 14:37:00
has certain requirements for theoretical depth, especially the interpretation and understanding of molecular scale.I selectd for a tragedy and suggested that I select for some areas of partial application.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-08 19:56:00
Ask how to upload the form and the picture when uploading the article. Is it necessary to upload it one by one or put it in a separate document?Or put this on the back of the text.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-10 16:56:00
I didn’t think it’s fast. I’ve been in it for half a month. I haven’t sent it for review. It’s 3 weeks, the result is 2Both the people and the editors feel that the research topics and journals are not rejected, and there are not many comments on the review. However, the editors are adults. If you think that it is not suitable, why should you submit it for a month?..
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service