MACROMOLECULES

It took exactly three months from the initial submission to the publication of the journal. During the process I made major revisions and minor revisions. The response time of the journal is pretty fast. I would like to thank Professor Liangbin Li, the associate editor of Macromolecules, who is very responsible and rigorous. After the first submission, the editor quickly submitted it for review, and sent back three reviewers' opinions with major revision, minor revision, transfer respectively. The editor required major revision. Then the author carefully revised the article and addressed the reviewers’ comments. The editor returned the article to the three reviewers. The first two reviewers agreed to publish it this time. The third reviewer still disagreed, and the editor gave the opportunity to modify again. The author emphatically responded to the third reviewer and explained the details of the experiment in detail. The article was finally accepted in more than a week. PS: After proofreading the manuscript, the system would send an email to inform that the article would be published online within 48–72 hours. But this time was not completely accurate, like mine, waited almost a week before it was published...

(5) Thank | 逆水行舟

Macromolecules, as an authoritative journal in the polymer field, are widely approved in the field. The process in the editors and reviewers and other parts are of fast speed. It is in the style of famous journal. The submission system of American Chemical Society is also more user-friendly. I recommend everyone to submit to this journal. My entire submission process is as follows. The time is not guaranteed to be completely accurate, for your reference only: 2019.06.06 submitted, 2019.06.08 under review, 2019.06.30 major revision, 2019.07.18 resubmitted, 2019.08.08 minor revision, 2019.08.15 resubmitted, 2019.08.26 accepted, 2019.08.31 proof review, 2019.09.06 published online.

(10) Thank | 逆水行舟

March 19, 2019, submission. Reviewer comments returned after 50 days and required a major revision. Reply to the reviewer's comments after 8 days and resubmitted the revised version. Accepted directly after 3 days. The overall speed is okay.

(11) Thank | 丁香花下

The research content of my article is to study the rubber vulcanization mechanism through epoxy model compounds, which is not a hot field (it’s even an unpopular field), but there is still a breakthrough in the research of rubber vulcanization. It took 50 days to review comments; there were two reviewers. I replied in detail to the reviewers' opinions and stated the opinions and basis of my papers. It took one month for the editor to reply. The attitude of replying to the review comments is really very important!

(2) Thank | 493882709@qq.com

One reviewer reviewed my paper, he suggested major revision but editor rejected my manuscript. very sad

(0) Thank | 11736051@zju.edu.cn

9.On the evening of the 30th, the submission was made, the 10.3 was filled with an agreement, and the 4th opened the mailbox and immediately responded. Since it was the first submission, it was drummed for one hour and submitted before noon.Until today, 10.15, or submitted to editorial office... the night before dreamed of being rejected, oh... anxious, maybe, really no news is the best news.Note: 1. The review speed is filled in casually, because no news has been received yet.2. The wrong time before, correct again

(0) Thank | 919003364@qq.com

9.30 Nothing was submitted at night, No. 10.3 was filled in with an Agreement, and No. 4 was opened to see the mailbox. After the first submission, the drumstick took one hour and submitted before noon.of.I know today, 10.18, or Submitted to Editorial Office... I dreamt of being rejected the night before, oh... anxious, maybe, there is really no news, the best news

(0) Thank | 919003364@qq.com

I am the second sci, the first section of the lab, the first time, the middle man told the boss.The research content is to study the rubber vulcanization mechanism through epoxy model compounds, which is not a hot field (even an unpopular), but there is still a breakthrough in the research of rubber vulcanization.At one time, the expectations were very high. They had submited in jacs, cm, and cs. They all thought that they were too professional for journals and did not submit a tragedy.It is estimated that these publications still prefer popular research content.Then switch to macromolecules, 50 days to review comments, two reviewers, one thinks that the full text has no urine, can be received directly; another I feel that did not understand, said no logic no innovation... edited to overhaul, time 2Months.I replied in detail to the reviewers' opinions and stated the opinions and basis of my papers. The responses to the review comments were 5,000 words (7000 words in my article).Return to the comments after one month.I thought that the editor would be assigned to the reviewer who had a lot of opinions. The result was accepted two days later!Very unexpected to me, it is estimated that the editor himself agrees with my content, and I also see my sincerity in responding to the review comments, so the attitude of replying to the review comments is really very important!Thanks to the co-editor of the big molecule, coates·geoffrey.Review draft:2016.10.27 submit2016.12.16 major revision (the previous time was incorrect)2017.1.17 Revised2017.1.19 accept

(18) Thank | 493882709@qq.com

8.1 The first submission, 9.10 comments, rejected after two overhauls, the editor suggested rewriting the re-submitment;According to the review comments, the article was re-adjusted, and some experiments were supplemented. 11.4 second submission, 12.3 review review comments, one minor revision agreed; 2017.02.09 accepted

(0) Thank | 15093321659@126.com

The review is now very fast, less than a month.The data requirements are comprehensive and the structure is best and novel.

(0) Thank | 无

The journal is the top journal in the field of polymers. The editors are very strict on the initial screening of the manuscript. Generally, they have not received the news for half a month. The representative is sent for review. The reviewer can be received in more than one month.Opinions, the level of reviewers is quite high, and asking questions can be described as a hit.The following is the process of my last paper from the initial submission to the final acceptance: 2013.3.18 contribution 2013.3.19 distribution editor 2013.5.4 request to amend 2013.5.12 select revision 2013.6.21 again request to amend 2013.6.23 again to select revision 2013.6.25 Received Receive Notification

(4) Thank | Anonymous

The efficiency is really high. Three reviewers, two weeks of review comments returned, and received more than an hour after the overhaul...I am still very satisfied with this part of my work. The reviewers are indeed very bullish, and the comments made are very helpful to the article.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The first time I selectd for a big molecule, the article was changed after the CM was rejected.I have read many articles in this journal. I feel that most of the articles are very high. It is difficult to listen to others. This time, I also tried to take the test. After all, the CM was rejected.Three reviewers, the third reviewer requested an overhaul.Received 20 days after modification.Although the impact factor is not high, personally think that Macromolecules is not worse than CM.Mainly the focus of the article content is different.Macromolecules focuses on the study of synthetic characterization mechanisms.CM is best made into devices, and the application data is best.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

This journal is a district of JCR Division ("JCR Journal Impact Factor and Zoning Situation" is carried out by the Chinese Academy of Sciences Documentation and Information Center according to the annual and disciplinary SCI journals according to the impact factors of SCI journals.Graded partition table), the journal of the polymer area under the chemical division NO.1 (now the majority of bugs do not have to distribute for scientific research, 32 points in one district, 16 points in the second district, you know the value of this publication).Because the review speed of this article is still fast, I waited for a month to have news, and directly acceptd.This publication is a watershed-like journal. It has more requirements than its better publications and is more troublesome to handle.Publications that are lower than it are not suitable for relatively new and innovative articles.Therefore, this journal has fewer things and a sense of accomplishment. Overall, the price/performance ratio

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has just been included in one article, and it is also my first SCI. The review speed is very fast, less than one.I returned the news in the month. One overhaul and two minor repairs, almost over 20 days to submitted out, two days to inform the reception, the efficiency is very high, very powerful!Our boss also supports the big players!Less than two months before and after, because the middle of the summer vacation, the data is still waiting for a while, otherwise it will be faster.There are two points to note about macromolecules: 1. The systematic nature of the data should be comprehensive.2. The theoretical depth is that it has a certain leading role in this field and is innovative.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

just submitted an article, hope that the

(0) Thank | Anonymous

macromolecule belongs to the top journal in the polymer field, butI don't know why IF has been so slow.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

The authoritative journal of polymer specialty, many of the brothers in the group (polymer synthesis) have selectd for this journal, and the jacs can't be changed, so they selectd for this

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Personal domestic master's degree published three articles about Macromolecules. I can learn a lot of things from Macromolecules. Although the impact factor is similar to Soft Matter, the quality of the article is definitely much stronger than softmatter and ACS is basically difficult. There is no way.Who makes USA the boss? Plus Macromolecules is a good place in the field of polymer research. It is good to be praised by the cite No1. The Macromolecules are basically published in the country. The foreign cattle group is a bit watery. This situation is related to Langmui

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Article ~ I feel that the reviewers submitted for review are quite powerful ~ the level is very high ~ see the article, the quality is also higher, better than CM ~ review cycle is generally within 3 months ~ normal speed ~

(0) Thank | Anonymous

After being submitted for 3 days, it was rejected by the editor. It is recommended to change the submitment. The speed is still quite fast, but it is more difficult. The editors are huge.what.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

macromolecules is the most authoritative journal in the field of macromolecules. The impact factor is between 4-5. Although not high, this journal has been the most cited journal in the field of macromolecules.More than 1,000 articles are published each year.I have sent a few articles, and a communication has been cited more than 40 times in 2 years, indicating that the readers are still a lot.The full article usually has 5-10 references a year.The manuscript has high requirements for the degree of innovation, the integrity of the research, and the depth. Of course, it is easy for the boss to be a cow.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The top journal in the polymer field is by no means a flow ratio compared to JAPS.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The younger brother feels that the journal's influence factor is rising too slowly. In 2007, Chem Mater's IF was 4.883, Biomacromolecules' IF was 4.169, and Macromolecular Rapid Communications was 3.383, but in 2009, Chem MaterAt 5.368, the increase was 0.485, Biomacromolecules reached 4.502, or 0.333, and Macromolecular Rapid Communications reached 4.263, an increase of 0.88. The macromolecule rose by 0.182 in recent years. I don’t know what the reason is.

(0) Thank | Anonymous