X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL]Hello, you are Visitor Number 238715 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleSENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Journal Title AbbreviationsSENSOR ACTUAT B-CHEM
ISSN0925-4005
h-index170
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
11.801.6251.521
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Q114 / 234
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Materials Chemistry
Q111 / 287
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Instrumentation
Q13 / 129
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Q132 / 670
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Condensed Matter Physics
Q117 / 403
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Metals and Alloys
Q14 / 152
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Surfaces, Coatings and Films
Q15 / 120

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)11.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/504104/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/snb/
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE SA, PO BOX 564, LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND, 1001
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationSWITZERLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1990
Annual Article Volume1707
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0925-4005%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.5 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Very difficult
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 3.1 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)
  Reviews on SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL: Write a review
Author: ningdi@nankai.edu.cn


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-20 23:24:58
Dear friends, it’s two months or a state of submit. Is this normal? Good heart panic
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ningdi@nankai.edu.cn

Author: huangcc1993@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-17 17:46:19
4.10 Submission, 6.13 minor repair, three reviewers are OK, there is a more extreme, 7.9 revise 7.12 is accepted after answering the question, editor Peter is very nice, I wish SNBs better and better!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | huangcc1993@163.com

Author: yiqu@sues.edu.cn


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-20 08:57:44
There is a quick and slow, one-month submission in the beginning of the year, and a reply in March.It’s been almost a month since two of the two queues.I will give Editor Invited a number within a week, and then return to submitted to Journal two days. Last year, this point was also very slow. It was dragged for 5 months. It was stopped for two or three months with the editor.The day immediately gave the message.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | yiqu@sues.edu.cn

Author: 小虫子


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-17 18:52:25
Submitted in early April, after three weeks of technical review, but resubmitted, 4.27 out of the article delivery code, and then a long wait, until 6.08, two months to the editorAfter another ten days, I was rejected by the trial and tossed for three months. It was said that the article was very interesting and did not meet some of the requirements of the journal. I just wanted to cry and tears, and tossed me in March.Only the next partners who need articles within half a year can be reminded to submit their contributions cautiously.Really energy consumption.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 小虫子

Author: minghaif@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-08 15:57:02
Since January 2018, the manuscript has been submitted. After one and a half months, it is still in the technical review stage, and the editor has gone.A letter reminded me, the next day I entered the review stage, and after more than 2 months of review comments, only one reviewer's comments and editorial comments, reviewers gave praise, onlyNeed a minor repair; and the editor feels not very good, to the overhaul, also raised a few questions, one of which is to say no idea where the new idea is, and ultimately to overhaul.After one month of revision, the experiment was finally submitted, and then the reviewer said that it was acceptable, and the editor said that the information of the question answered was added.After a week of modification, the material was returned. The news that the speed was obtained was that the last uploaded photo format was a bit problematic, which made it unclear. It was OK to change from TIF to JPG.But the journal said that TIF is also ok, I don't know why?Accepted after 4-5 daysThen the speedy proofs came back, and then all the things in the later stages had to be filled out.The overall feeling is particularly slow in the early stage, and the latter is better and faster.Until the acceptance is 2018.06.05, the time spent is nearly 5 months...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | minghaif@163.com

Author: minghaif@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-08 15:54:43
Since January 2018, the manuscript has been submitted. After a month and a half, it is still in the technical review stage. The editor has sent a letter to remind him, and the next day he enters the review stage and then goes throughAfter more than 2 months of review comments, only one reviewer's comments and editorial comments, the reviewers gave praise, only minor repairs; and the editors feel not very good, to overhaul, also mentioned a fewOne of the problems is that I don’t know where the new ideas are, and eventually I will overhaul them.After one month of revision, the experiment was finally submitted, and then the reviewer said that it was acceptable, and the editor said that the information of the question answered was added.After a week of modification, the material was returned. The news that the speed was obtained was that the last uploaded photo format was a bit problematic, which made it unclear. It was OK to change from TIF to JPG.But the journal said that TIF is also ok, I don't know why?Accepted after 4-5 daysThen the speedy proofs came back, and then all the things in the later stages had to be filled out.The overall feeling is particularly slow in the early stage, and the latter is better and faster.Until the acceptance is 2018.06.05, the time of the experience is nearly 5 months...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | minghaif@163.com

Author: minghaif@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-08 15:53:48
Since January 2018, the manuscript has been submitted. After one and a half months, it is still in the technical review stage, and the editor has gone.A letter reminded me, the next day I entered the review stage, and after more than 2 months of review comments, only one reviewer's comments and editorial comments, reviewers gave praise, onlyNeed a minor repair; and the editor feels not very good, to the overhaul, also raised a few questions, one of which is to say no idea where the new idea is, and ultimately to overhaul.After one month of revision, the experiment was finally submitted, and then the reviewer said that it was acceptable, and the editor said that the information of the question answered was added.After a week of modification, the material was returned. The news that the speed was obtained was that the last uploaded photo format was a bit problematic, which made it unclear. It was OK to change from TIF to JPG.But the journal said that TIF is also ok, I don't know why?Accepted after 4-5 daysThen the speedy proofs came back, and then all the things in the later stages had to be filled out.The overall feeling is particularly slow in the early stage, and the latter is better and faster.Until the acceptance is 2018.06.05, the time spent is nearly 5 months...
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | minghaif@163.com

Author: minghaif@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-08 15:53:37
Since January 2018, the manuscript has been submitted. After a month and a half, it is still in the technical review stage. The editor has sent a letter to remind him, and the next day he enters the review stage and then goes throughAfter more than 2 months of review comments, only one reviewer's comments and editorial comments, the reviewers gave praise, only minor repairs; and the editors feel not very good, to overhaul, also mentioned a fewOne of the problems is that I don’t know where the new ideas are, and eventually I will overhaul them.After one month of revision, the experiment was finally submitted, and then the reviewer said that it was acceptable, and the editor said that the information of the question answered was added.After a week of modification, the material was returned. The news that the speed was obtained was that the last uploaded photo format was a bit problematic, which made it unclear. It was OK to change from TIF to JPG.But the journal said that TIF is also ok, I don't know why?Accepted after 4-5 daysThen the speedy proofs came back, and then all the things in the later stages had to be filled out.The overall feeling is particularly slow in the early stage, and the latter is better and faster.Until the acceptance is 2018.06.05, the time of the experience is nearly 5 months...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | minghaif@163.com

Author: pfz@mail.ustc.edu.cn


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-05 08:46:54
was first submitted as a communication author.Before the Christmas submission, it took more than three months to distribute the editors. The review was less than two months, and the overhaul comments were made. The overhaul comments were mainly for the supplement of the experimental details.The change is returned within two weeks, and the message is received one week later.Then complete the online and assign the journal number within two weeks.Personally, journal editors have a greater ability to control the article. The article does not emphasize innovation very much, but pays more attention to the article's informative data, detailed analysis, logical self-consistency and method practicality.It is a rare journal with a relatively strong style of writing, and the influence factor is steadily increasing.If you have a chance to contribute, you should still take good care of it.But it is not suitable for friends who are in urgent need of articles.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | pfz@mail.ustc.edu.cn

Author: hai_wenfeng@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-04 10:15:26
The review is very long, and the graduated younger brothers and sisters should consider it clearly.I was fortunate to have received the e-mail of the paper on the morning of the deadline for submitting the application for the doctoral thesis, and almost didn't cry.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | hai_wenfeng@163.com

Author: hai_wenfeng@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-04 10:15:21
The review is very long, and the graduated younger brothers and sisters should consider it clearly.I was fortunate to have received the e-mail of the paper on the morning of the deadline for submitting the application for the doctoral thesis, and almost didn't cry.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | hai_wenfeng@163.com

Author: hai_wenfeng@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-04 10:14:50
has a long review, and the graduates and sisters should consider it clearly.I was fortunate to have received the e-mail of the paper on the morning of the deadline for submitting the application for the doctoral thesis, and almost didn't cry.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | hai_wenfeng@163.com

Author: 123456


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 9.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-23 09:38:56
was originally slow, and recently it was slow to explode. Students are waiting to graduate. Still, one month is still submitted to the journal. Do you believe it?The heart is mad.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 123456

Author: lhc111@sjtu.edu.cn


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-22 18:35:31
emmmm;The mail of the reminder can't be sent out. ///
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | lhc111@sjtu.edu.cn

Author: lhc111@sjtu.edu.cn


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-21 21:30:45
4 submission on the 24th, technical review is not closedResubmitted on April 26May 8th editorial invitationMay 9 again changed back to submit to journalIt is almost a month since May 21st, or submit to journal, a little speechless.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | lhc111@sjtu.edu.cn

Author: 13756016357@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-17 08:18:42
First of all, we must emphasize that the review of this journal is really slow. The first time I received the review for about two months, the two editors, the questions are not very difficult, one month.Returning to the review comments, I received the notification within about 20 days. I am very pleased that the wait for nearly four months is not white. After all, the impact factor is not bad. It is not recommended for graduates or friends who are anxious to submit articles.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 13756016357@163.com

Author: 13756016357@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-17 08:18:36
First of all, we must emphasize that the review of this journal is really slow. The first time I received the review for about two months, the two editors, the questions areI am not very embarrassed. I returned to the review draft in one month and received the notification notice in about 20 days. I am very pleased that the wait for nearly four months is not white. After all, the impact factor is not bad. I don’t recommend graduates or urgently want articles.Friends contribute.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 13756016357@163.com

Author: 995195253@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-15 22:53:32
2月15日submitted to the journalMarch 15 under reviewApril 5 major revisionReworked on April 30Accepted on May 15e
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 995195253@qq.com

Author: 蓝色是有雨


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-10 10:19:48
3The draft submitted in the month is still submitted to journal, I don't know how long it will take.I want to retract the manuscript, but I haven’t gotten the article in the editor’s hand.Please help.Really can't afford
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 蓝色是有雨

Author: Zhang


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-04 22:33:57
is slow, this year is surprisingly slow, remember the people who use the article, don't select this
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Zhang

Author: e0244920@u.nus.edu


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-03 19:41:30
This journal is really a turtle speed, it has been submitted for so long, has been submitted to jurnal, has not yet reached the technical review step, it is really anxious people
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | e0244920@u.nus.edu

Author: codymeadow@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-28 23:22:22
The review speed is really a bit slow. If you are in a hurry, please choose carefully. Don’t bet on that lucky value. But after the review comments come back, the change will be very fast, one of mys.Minor repair a proposal to receive, after the change was sent back to the formal acceptance of two days.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | codymeadow@qq.com

Author: BAI


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-26 12:27:13
for more than a month, the status is still submitted to journal. For the speed really dare to compliment
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | BAI

Author: chen@zchenguang.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-19 11:39:10
1月15 ContributionFebruary 10 Technical review is not resubmittedAround 10 March Under reviewApril 18 major reviewThis journal is really slow to review, and it is not recommended to graduate.Now I have to supplement the data, 哎
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | chen@zchenguang.com

Author: 蓝色是有雨


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-18 18:57:27
This journal was selectd on March 28th. The status of March 30th changed to technical review. The middle has not changed state. On April 18th, it suddenly became Submitted to Journal.Know what it is.Too slow, submitted for 20 days, but returned to the original point.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 蓝色是有雨

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)

Start your review of [SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service