POLYMER

May 19 Submission; May 21 with editor; May 21 under review (date changed 7 or 8 times); July 1 under editor evaluation (date changed 2 times); July 14 major revision (5 reviewers invited, 4 returned comments, 1 accepted it directly, the other three required revisions, and the questions are easier to answer); July 31 revision submitted to journal; August 3 with editor; August 6 accepted.

(0) Thank | 祈祷早日毕业的学渣

20190705 accepted; 20190704 minor revision submission; 20190617 return comment for minor revision; 20190610 major revision submitted; 20190529 comment returned for major revision; 20190425 under review 20190418 submission. It took a total of 80 days. The first major revision was required mainly because the manuscript format was too messy, and there were many grammatical errors and formatting errors. But actually there were few substantial changes. The editor Michael Silverstein processes the manuscript very quickly, and he will give you the result within one day after with editor.

(2) Thank | taiyangyu

2019.4.13 submit; 2019.4.15 under editor; 2019.4.23 under review; 2019.4.26 under review; 2019.6.3 with editor evaluation; 2019.6.4 reject. It doesn't make much sense for reviewer comments. They didn't read the article carefully and didn’t understand the chemical reactions. Among 9 questions, 7 were speechless, and of course 2 were useful.

(0) Thank | sunrise

The editor is better and the speed is very fast. The reviewer 1 has raised 2 pages and 16 questions. Basically, it is a speechless question. Do you suspect that COF is not a polymer?Why is the assumption of such a structure when questioning the simulation?No constructive comments...

(0) Thank | 迷路了

I also expected him to graduate when he selectd, and he fell to the 3rd district, hehe...

(2) Thank | 迷路了

Polymer as a traditional veteran journal, has not fallen to the third district (IF = 3.438), people can not help but regret.As the big brother of the polymer, Macromolecules (the large corpse has been lying in the second district), it is now surpassed by the Journal of Membrane Science and so on.Although you can't read IF, you have to look at the quality, but it has always been IF is not high, it will affect the quality of journal articles.In a word: the wine is also afraid of the deep alley, not to mention the place where the Chinese are in.... You know.

(25) Thank | sci

has been selectd for 8 days and was rejected by the editor. The legendary hard select is true!

(0) Thank | 在路上

All went into the under review, it was very happy, I wanted to say the first level, I should be able to accept it after the modification, the result is not uploaded because the map uploadWell, the format ran away, so that the review manuscript did not understand, and finally the editor gave the rejection, super sad.It is recommended to take a look at the original text before sending it out.

(5) Thank | DY

Submitted on June 5thJuly 15th overhaul noticeAugust 26 revised draft submissionSeptember 12 minor repairSeptember 29 Submission article submissionOctober 3rd receptionIt’s not easy, the reviewers are very professional, and many of the questions raised are worth thinking about. This submission has benefited a lot, thanks to the rejection of smart materials and structural journals, and the opportunity to deliver the polymer journal

(5) Thank | 半夏浅凉

was rejected in three or four days...It is recommended to switch to PDST

(0) Thank | 悲剧啊啊啊

The first SCI is about one month before and after, after the revision, it will be more sensitive to novelty

(1) Thank | 现在有点肚子痛

After the submission, more than one point of overhaul, overdue one month to receive.

(2) Thank | 阳光123

Although the factor has dropped, it feels that the difficulty of submission is still the same.

(3) Thank | 哒哒哒

Very bad in the submitted four times in the middle of an editor is still very responsible if he feels that the quality of the article is good, even if only one reviewer will directly give it but generally die in the editorWho knows the impact factor 2018

(0) Thank | 小傻

It’s not good to select for four times. One editor is still very responsible. If he thinks the article is of good quality, even if only one reviewer will give it directly, he will usually die in the editor’s hand.里

(0) Thank | 小傻

呜呜呜呜, rejected by the second, how is it so difficult

(0) Thank | 新航线

very difficult to select, submission difficulty is difficult in the 1st district, receivingThe amount is also small, but I don't know why IF is so low.It was a good year before, and it was rejected several times.Innovative requirements are extremely high.

(1) Thank | 勇

10月28Submission,Rejected on December 18,I feel that the reviewer refused without giving specific comments. After making up a lot of experiments, I sent an email to appeal, and the editor asked to re-submit.Re-submited on February 1st,On March 26, the minor revisions came back.Replyed to the past on April 9 and received it two days later.It is really lucky, because I am eager to graduate, catch up with

(0) Thank | 落

12 Submitted on the 5th of the month, the overhaul on January 20th, the repair on March 4th, and the acceptance on April 8th, four months before and after.You can also accept

(0) Thank | yxchen@hdu.edu.cn

Received at EditorialOffice 24 Sep 2017Article revised 27 Nov 2017Article accepted for publication 30 Nov 2017

(0) Thank | wangyixi301@163.com

is transferred to RSC ADV.However, I didn’t turn my heart, I didn’t want my results to be sent to the water journal in vain, and I changed it to fill the polymer. I’m still under review, I hope there are good results.

(5) Thank | scidewo

Two times to submitted polymer, the first two rounds of reviewing 4 reviewers, the previous round of two reviewers did not give specific amendments, one refused, no specific rejection reasonsAnother reviewer gave a valuable opinion and did not give a specific reason, and then sent the second round. Both reviewers gave overhaul, supplemented the experiment, modified the reception after 2 months, and submitted the draft cycle.month.The second time, I selectd for a short communication. After submitting the manuscript for 2 days, the review was reviewed. After one month, the review comments were returned. The reviewers agreed that it was very interesting to give praise, to the overhaul, to return after the experiment, and to accept it directly after 2 weeks.The cycle is 2 months.I recently selectd for another one. I have reviewed it for a month, and the review comments have not yet returned. I hope I can give praise and wait.

(2) Thank | li

holding hope, 2 weeks later, was rejected~~Personally, it must be innovative and pay more attention to theory.

(0) Thank | G

holds hope, 2 weeks later, was rejected~~

(0) Thank | G

submitted for one and a half months was rejected, unfortunately, polymer counts the old authority in the polymerThe journal, IF has been tepid, but it is still very good.

(0) Thank | Anonymous