My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 50535 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleLWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsLWT-FOOD SCI TECHNOL
ISSN0023-6438
E-ISSN1096-1127
h-index115
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
4.171.4001.600
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Food Science
Q124 / 273

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)9.30%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622910/description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/lwt/
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1968
Annual Article Volume922
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0023-6438%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 10.8 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 8.1 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 3 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: Write a review
Author: 657444848@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 9.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-23 09:53:37
The review process took about 9 months, with major and minor revisions needed. In the end one of the reviewers was not satisfied with our revisions and thought the paper needed to be rewritten. The article was rejected.

(0) Thank | 657444848@qq.com

Author: Bruno


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-25 19:37:24
Submitted on December 13th, return with minor revisions after 31 days (2 comments from each of the three reviewers). I submitted the corrections on the same day and the acceptance came after 21 days. The whole process is well notified and detailed.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Bruno

Author: 一条懒蛇


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-06 10:30:49
Submitted in May, accepted on December 4th, and repaired three times during the period. Basically, it is a detailed language problem. It is very tenacious and very lucky.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 一条懒蛇

Author: 啊哈啊


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-19 17:06:41
6.1 Submission7.31 Overhaul8.27 Repair9.17 minor repair9.27 Repair11.10 Receive
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 啊哈啊

Author: w.jiahua@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-29 11:33:15
4 sep 2017, submit;9 dec 2017, major revision and reconsideration (2 reviewers' comments);20 jan 2018, submit revision version;9 mar 2017, major revision and reconsideration (additional 2 reviewer comments, 5 in total, 1 accepted, 2 minor repairs, 2 overhauls);2 may 2018, submit revision version;3 may 2018, accept8 may 2018, complete final reading-proof;10 may 2018, online pre-publication.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | w.jiahua@163.com

Author: w.jiahua@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-29 11:33:01
4 sep 2017, submit;9 dec 2017, major revision and reconsideration (2 reviewers' comments);20 jan 2018, submit revision version;9 mar 2017, major revision and reconsideration (additional 2 reviewer comments, 5 in total, 1 accepted, 2 minor repairs, 2 overhauls);2 may 2018, submit revision version;3 may 2018, accept8 may 2018, complete final reading-proof;10 may 2018, online pre-publication.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | w.jiahua@163.com

Author: 657444848@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 9.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-23 09:53:45
8 Sep 2017, submit;12 Mar 2018, major revision and reconsideration (two reviewers, both of which affirmed the article, but all raised three questions);30 Mar 2018, submit revision version (Question for Reviewer 1: Accept 1 and reject 2; For Reviewer 2: Accept 2, reject 1;);19 June 2018, Reject (The reason is that Reviewer 1 is not satisfied with our answer and believes that the experiment needs to be supplemented, and the author does not intend to add it).So I waited for 9 months, and after the overhaul, it was really sad.And one of the two questions we rejected the reviewer 1 directly denied the feasibility of our raw materials.... If you accept his opinion, it would be equivalent to redoing all the experiments, and the article should be rewritten.And another question is really not necessary to accept.In the final analysis, Reviewer 1 is either dissatisfied with the two questions we dismissed, or has a hatred with one of our authors.Above, the importance of reviewers.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 657444848@qq.com

Author: 哈哈大王


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-10 16:32:27
2017.11.26 Submission 2018.02.03 Overhaul 2018.03.06 Back to journal 2018.3.8 ReceiveThe receiving speed is very fast, and I hope that the peers will submit the draft smoothly.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 哈哈大王

Author: 哈哈大王


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-10 16:32:03
2017.11.26 Submission 2018.02.03 Overhaul 2018.03.06 Back to journal 2018.3.8 ReceiveThe receiving speed is very fast, and I hope that the peers will submit the draft smoothly.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 哈哈大王

Author: blululu


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-06 13:43:41
speed is OK, dragged on for two months, normal should be three months can be done,The level of the journal article is still almost the same as the three or four points. After two revisions, it will be accepted one week later.I feel that the article is almost the same, I still want to select for the second district, it is still worth recommending
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | blululu

Author: 657444848@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-13 12:09:24
3 Sep 2017, Submit;12 Dec 2017, major revision and reconsideration (the so-called overhaul is also a small problem that is not to be modified, which we completely dismissed);20 Dec 2017, Submit revision version;9 Jan 2017, Accept;9 Jan 2017, complete final reading-proof;11 Jan 2017, online pre-publication.The speed of reviewing is not fast, especially after submitting the revised manuscript, it took 20 days to accept it. Many journals accepted it within 5 working days, but finished final reading-proof to the network pre-release soon, within a week!
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | 657444848@qq.com

Author: LWT


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-03 14:30:28
Three reviewers, asked more questions, received after overhaul.Need to wait patiently, the editing process is slow, with editor about 10 days, reviewing the draft for about two to three months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | LWT

Author: 13614317400@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-10 17:37:03
want to select for this journal, where can I find the modified format of this journal?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 13614317400@163.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-27 19:59:48
Editing is a female university professor in France. It is not too fast, but it is not very slow. It may still be due to editors and reviewers.The comments were good, especially the editors, very enthusiastic.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-23 00:33:00
was submitted in mid-January this year, minor repair, accepted in early November.I didn't see the evaluation of the small woodworm before the select, and later found that everyone said that the review was slow, that regret.Sure enough, it is quite slow.I don’t plan to select again in the future.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-29 11:22:00
How do I write to the editorial office?Which mail name is it?Thank you!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-21 13:57:00
has been more than a year, and the status of Required Reviews Completed has been displayed for more than half a year.It is speechless to this journal and it is recommended not to select.It is better to switch to other journals.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-29 00:15:00
This January selectThe manuscript...returned to the overhaul at the end of April...Imported at the end of June...Returned to the minor repair at the end of August...Imported at the end of October... Received two days later...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-18 19:57:00
JournalHomepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... /622910/description
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-12 18:16:00
is very slow, selectd in January, return in May, re-attend after revisionNo response now!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-11-25 20:41:00
After I selectd for 5 months, I wrote a letter asking, and then the date changed, indicating that the manuscript was reviewed.Vote for this journal to kill people.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 食品工程
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-10-15 12:20:00
is very slow, there is no news for 6 months, the mail asks progress twice, no return.Prepare to retract.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 功能食品
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-10-14 17:16:00
The review is very slow, one submitted in January this year, and the result of returning to the review in June is a major overhaul. It will be received in October after the change is announced in August.Another submission has not been directly rejected by the editor for two weeks.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy