I have to say that this journal is quite awesome. I submitted my paper on July 17 and the technical review was returned on the same day. After the amendment was uploaded, it was sent to the editor. On July 19, it was submitted for review. Twenty days later, the results were provided. It required some revisions. The second reviewer is well known in the field. He raised a lot of questions about the impedance, and the editor didn’t understand it. Fortunately, another person knew about the impedance and gave me a lot of help. I took the modification very seriously, and then I returned it on September 10. The technical review on the 11th was short.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I want to say that I only spent 11 days from submission to accept, the editing is super good, and the editor is also very professional. When revise, I raised 4 questions, each question.All of them are very professional. I submitted it to 2018.11.19, received it at 2018.11.30, and modified it in the middle. On the day of 11.30, I revised the manuscript of Revise at 5 pm, with editor after two hours, and “accept” at 10:30 pm.At that time, I was so excited that I cried. Because it was the first sci in my life, I met such a good editor and reviewer of Nice. The deadline for submission was so short. The first sci was written and revised for a total of ten months.At present, I hope that the research road will become more and more smooth and better, and I will support the Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry. I am very optimistic!Electrochemical old-fashioned journals, worth it!

(133) Thank | Jiahui

I feel that editing is very good.

(9) Thank | na

16 October 21 contribution,23 returned to modify the format, returned to the opinion on April 29, 17th, returned within a week, received on May 27, although the time is long but still received.The first sci

(0) Thank | 艾克

Efficiency is still quite high, March 13 contribution, 14 rejections modify some formats and thenCast, 15under review, April 22 overhaul, return on April 28, major overhaul on May 8, minor repair on May 12, received on May 13.The editor is still relatively responsible

(2) Thank | 2226471723@qq.com

The editor is really sloppy, 2 hours tells me that English is too weak and directly rejected. I used to select for articles. I have never encountered this situation, but the journal is really efficient.Since they don't like me, I changed my select to

(2) Thank | 科研狗

with editor A week, no movement

(3) Thank | 哈哈

has to say that this journal is very efficient, submitted on December 15th, and responded to the review comments on December 31st, a minor repair, a major overhaul.Returned to the revised draft on January 8 and accepted on January 11.This journal really gives strength, the first paper that really makes sense after work!I feel that as long as there is innovation, the acceptance speed will be very fast.

(1) Thank | chj143

has to say that this journal is very efficient, submitted on December 15th, and responded to the review comments on December 31st, a minor repair, a major overhaul.Returned to the revised draft on January 8 and accepted on January 11.This journal really gives strength, the first paper that really makes sense after work!I feel that as long as there is innovation, the acceptance speed will be very fast.

(0) Thank | chj143

has to say that this journal is very efficient, submitted on December 15th, and responded to the review comments on December 31st, a minor repair, a major overhaul.Returned to the revised draft on January 8 and accepted on January 11.This journal really gives strength, the first paper that really makes sense after work!I feel that as long as there is innovation, the acceptance speed will be very fast.

(0) Thank | chj143

Has anyone recently selectd for this journal, does this journal have a template, the official website of Instructions For Authors can't open, ask for help, which template has a request for a copyGive me 318889425@qq.com

(0) Thank | 318889425@qq.com

3 months...I selectd at the end of November 14th, under review until the end of February 15th!The date is the same!I will definitely not select for this journal in the future!Subsequent experiments can't be done at all!

(2) Thank | 大魔王

My papers have been reworked for 3 months, or under review

(1) Thank | ‘jloiu

The paper has been reworked for more than 3 months, and it is still in the review. The inquiry letter cannot be sent. I don’t know that the contributor has a way to contact the editorial department.

(1) Thank | dfgdsg

. It has been under review

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has been reviewed for 4 months.I rushed to say that 3 review comments just came back, but I have to wait for another 2

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has been under review for two months, I feel so good, waiting for graduation

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The journal is really slow. Before the sister-in-law selectd for one, it was quite successful.I selectd around June 20th and returned to the review draft on September 4th. Two reviewers: Reviewer#1: Single phase was obtained by the method, and this is worth reporting. Mainly need to discuss andSpecial points in the literature differences and methods; Reviewer#2: The article is well presented, and the findings are valuable to be published. Howe

(0) Thank | Anonymous

20 days gave two reviewers' opinions, both reviewersIt is recommended to receive after minor repairs. After the modification, I think that there will be results in a few days. Who knows that the review status has become under review, and it has become a minor repair after nearly one month review, and a reviewer has proposedA question was asked to answer, and the answer was returned to the trial. After waiting for more than 20 days, the status became required comments completed. Finally, the state lasted for 11 days, but it was finally received.For the whole three months, wait for people to work hard.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

23-07-2013 Initial Date Submitted24-08-2013RejectReviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advisingOf your work. meant I must reject it. A review opinion

(0) Thank | Anonymous

7.16 was submitted on the day, and the review comments were received on 7.31 (overhaul, but only one reviewer's 5 comments,No major changes are required), uploaded after modification on 8.13 days, and received on 8.16.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Do you have a style for this journal?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2013-03-22Submission 2013-04-09 Minor two reviewers, one mentioning 4 suggestions, are very small problems, such as the picture title is not clear, the grammar is changedChange.Another reviewer said that it would be accepted directly without modification.In the middle, due to something going out, I returned to repair on April 18th.2013-04-22 Acceptance from submission to acceptance for one month, so fast.The editor was very careful, and both the format and the writing errors were proposed for modification.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

After 1 month of submission, I was with the editor. I felt that there was no drama. After that, I was sent to the trial only two months later. I paid back the comments for 3 months. I feel that the review speed is still very fast..The opinions given are also very pertinent.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

just started to submitted alloys and compounds, JAC... In the case that the two reviewers consistently favored the article, they were rejected by the editor, and the fire was big, three or four before and after.Month, later changed to the Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, February 11th select, March 9th, Xiao Xiu... Three reviewers, raised almost 10 questions, have to make up the data or something.... HopeCan you... I like this journal is really fast... I just read everyone’s comments and decided to select for it...

(0) Thank | Anonymous