X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL]Hello, you are Visitor Number 461772 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Journal Title AbbreviationsCHEM ENG J
ISSN1385-8947
h-index172
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
15.202.3152.177
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Q12 / 340
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q15 / 115
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemical Engineering
Q19 / 281
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemistry
Q122 / 398

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)11.80%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/601273/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/CEJ
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE SA, PO BOX 564, LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND, 1001
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationSWITZERLAND
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1996
Annual Article Volume2508
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1385-8947%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.7 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 3.9 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 93%
Data from Elsevier: 18%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 4 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    5    6    7    8    9    10    11    Next    Last  (To Page
/11)
  Reviews on CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-06 20:50:00
11 officially received on the 27th of the month, and the letter was received on July 6th, and finally refused.Slow is not too slow, the previous good luck may be used up.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-01 17:09:00
1Submission No. 30, 3.29 Rework, four reviewers, more questions, one by one, about 3 weeks later, and more than one month to continue repair, the third reviewThe manuscript was really attached and added 5 questions. After the answer, I submitted it. I received it in three or four days. I received the acceptance letter on the weekend, thanking the reviewer and the editor!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-01 15:17:00
was changed to cej after being rejected by other journals, 4.17 submitted, 6.17 returned opinions, and the review comments were very pertinent, but I don’t know why there are only two reviewers’ opinions, and only until the endTwo reviewers' suggestions.6.28 on accept, the speed is very fast, but unfortunately the previous article data is not fully submited elsewhere, delaying too much time leading to delay, and now the result is also relying on the teacher to spare no effort to help.In any case, there is already a bargaining chip, and thanks to the dilemma that people can only grow faster if they have experienced the pain of failure.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-17 09:17:00
2 At the beginning of the month, it is still under review, and it feels very slow. It may be that the character is not good.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-13 14:44:00
The first paper was finally sent.Luck is a bit worse. I think that a good thing has submitted countless places, and I also blame my ability to write and draw.Submitted on March 19th, after the technical review was returned, revised and then submitted to the trial, overhaul, 4 editors required theoretical reinforcement, supplemented a little experiment, and accepted May 12 after returning.Fortunately, O(∩_∩)O
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-24 10:59:00
submitted in mid-November 2012, and waited for more than three months. Due to the urgency of graduation, the instructor sent an email reminder to edit, and the editor (Guy Marin) was veryQuickly reply to the review comments, it is estimated that one of the reviewers is missing, so the review comments are only Reviewer #2 and #3, lack #1.Among them, No. 2 reviewers raised 15 questions, mainly for the verification of simulation results and experiments. No. 3 reviewers felt very innovative and directly said OK.After re-sending the review, I waited for more than 20 days and then responded to the second review (substantially unchanged), and then accepted.The whole process from submitted to accepted lasted for 6 months (mainly because the character did not break out, the students in the journal around the basic 2-
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-21 15:37:00
selectd last November, still unknown,I sent a letter to remind me, saying that a reviewer has not returned opinions. It has been 6 months. It is estimated that there is a cup.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-16 12:17:00
CEJ's review speed is OK, I was last year.Submitted on November 28th, returned to the revised opinion for over 2 months, revised and submitted after two months, returned to the second revision of the review in one month, revised after three weeks, and received after one week. Total from submission to receptionAbout 6 months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-10 18:34:00
Editor is Dr. Marc A. Deshusses, it’s hard to imagine it, 6 months or more, less than 7 months! About biological treatment of pollutants, especiallyIt is VOCs, Dr. Marc A. Deshusses is the big cow of this piece. My article is written in general, but the editor is the mentor of my brother in the United States, give me face, receive it.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-07 14:16:00
April 28th submitted, waiting, I hope there is a good result
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-04 17:31:00
I selectd for 1.31, and the review was reviewed for 4 months.Interim reminder once, overhaul!I received it in a few days after the repair, and I finally got the page number in the first 2 days, and I experienced nearly half a year before and after.Nima, finally graduated~~~~~~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-25 16:39:00
I see the review of this journal is very fast, my manuscript has been for a few months.There is no news yet, I feel that I am going to finish the egg
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-14 19:39:00
submission process is as follows:16 Feb 2013 Submitted (Sat)16 Feb 2013 Technical Check in Progress (Sat)18 Feb 2013 With Editor (Mon)18 Feb 2013 Under Review (Mon)04 Mar 2013 Under Review (Mon)21 Mar 2013 Minor Revision (Thur)11Apr 2013
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-13 17:33:00
Last December, the under review of more than 4 months.The editor is M. Deshusses, who repeatedly rushed to post emails and never returned...Later, I learned that only one reviewer gave comments. Finally, the editor gave a major revision. After two weeks of submission, I submitted it for two days. It was quite smooth. The editor also invited me to submit the Journal cover. This is my first SCI in the second district.Thank you very much.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-13 16:40:00
April 13th, editor invited, manuscript number reached more than 1,400, many contributors ah
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-10 06:06:00
The Guy Marin editor who selected the reaction project did not expect much from his own manuscript, but still recorded the process http://www.lct.ugent.be/people/overview/1/enhttp://www.eric-aisbl.eu/component/content/article/86 This professor is still very bullish
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-07 09:36:00
2月4日稿February 6th March External audit March 26 return results: 3 reviewers agree that after the minor repair, they will return to the revised draft on April 4th and receive it on April 5th.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-31 23:48:00
1月30# Submitted on March 8th, the two reviewers recommend receivingEach of the five comments was submitted. It is very responsible for the acceptance of the editor on March 30th, and it is very responsible for the review.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-28 13:50:00
10Submission on March 31, returned on January 15th, gave 8 weeks, three reviewers recommended, one refused, one suggested overhaul, Dr. Dionysios D. DionysiouThe editor gave the overhaul and told me to answer the comments and return the results to the reviewers. If someone suggested to modify them, they would simply refuse.The reviewers raised a total of eight questions and carefully answered them one by one.The March 6th return draft was returned and accepted on March 26.The opinions returned by the two original reviewers were directly accepted.Thanks to Dr. Dionysios D. Dionysiou for editing and reviewers.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-25 19:17:00
just found one, the journal has selectd three before, two in two.Thank you very much, Dr. Jesus Santamaria!A total of three reviewers, a minor repair, there are three Good and four Wells in the review language; a minor repair, said a little unclear, to write clearly, while using four Good and three Well in the evaluation; the last oneThe manuscript gave "reject" for the simple reason that we have too much work in this area, although the results of the manuscript are more interesting.Finally, Dr. Jesus Santamaria gave a major repair, returned four days later (no data), and waited for 7 days to accept it.Feel the CEJ to have a certain novelty
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-25 15:35:00
2012-12-28 Submit the first draft
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-25 11:38:00
must praise the editor Prof. Stephen Allen carefully and efficiently.I am doing environmental aspects.Both articles were written almost simultaneously.I started to select for one article, and the review was directly rejected after more than a month. The film was indeed insufficiency.After an interval, I dropped another article. I was worried that the interval would be short. The editor would have a bad impression. I also reviewed the manuscript for more than a month. When the reviewer refused to overhaul it, Allen’s editor gave it a major overhaul.Accepted for two days, did not send reviewers to see.From submitment to trial to repair and acceptance, and online are all efficient and rigorous.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-17 14:32:00
1. 2013.01.30 submitted to journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-15 11:02:00
CEJ Is it true?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-15 10:29:00
The experimental content is the preparation of nanomaterials by solvothermal method. In general, a new type of substance was synthesized by slightly modifying others.Focusing on the morphology and method of synthesis, the nature is considered to be on the sling.2012.11.14 submitted 11.16 editor invited 11.21 send back to author Basic review is not closed (requires 3-5 highlights, each can not exceed 80 characters; line spacing is 2 times the line spacing; references need to be written consecutively, marked with square brackets11.2
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    5    6    7    8    9    10    11    Next    Last  (To Page
/11)

Start your review of [CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service