Energy & Environmental Science

Review period is about 2 months. Rejected for lack of novelty, but appealed.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Give the modified re-projection, look forward to good luck

(4) Thank | qq572020211

was sent to the trial today. It is estimated that the ultimate reviewer has gone. Hey, I feel that I have to be rejected.

(2) Thank | qq572020211

November 29th review, today, January 8th becomes witheditor, really nervous, no bottom, will it be tragedy, hope good luck,,,,,,,

(2) Thank | qq572020211

Combining the experience of submitting at least 5 times with yourself and the surrounding friends, the rate of submission of the journal is extremely high (every shot is submitted for review, wasting time!!!)...The review speed is slow (reviewed in 2 months)...Edit the partial metamorphosis...If you are fortunate enough to get a chance to change, the second round of review will add two more reviewers...The four reviewers will reject the manuscript if they have negative opinions...The forced grid is higher than the JACS.Almost all of them are big cattle or related households, the impact factor is guaranteed, the quality of the articles is uneven, and the word of mouth is average.There is no Nano Letters to use when reviewing Qing Qian.

(2) Thank | Andrew

has been sent for 10 days, I hope to give me good luck

(2) Thank | qq572020211

Can anyone tell me if this journal is checked, thank you

(0) Thank | qq572020211

Scientific drawing drawing SCI journal journal 3D abstract drawing TOC cover chart flow chart design drawingQQ 3188675558

(0) Thank | 科研绘图

EES impact factor exceeds 30 for the first time!The quality of articles in the energy field is getting better and better, more than AM, NC, AEM.

(2) Thank | XT189

Energy

(0) Thank | XT189

It’s really smashed 30

(0) Thank | UU

IF breaks through 30, the quality of the article is getting higher and higher, inThe average article quality in the energy field has exceeded AM, NC, etc., I hope that the next year IF will break through 35, and the better it will be.

(2) Thank | 123

Biochemical direction, reviewed for nearly 3 months, 3 reviewers2 received 1 repair, the editor asked to answer two big questions (overhaul).Modified one and a half months, 7 days to receive.

(124) Thank | 948890460@qq.com

such a cow journal, Impact Factor: 29.518.After one month of review, three reviews, one adjudicator was eventually rejected.

(64) Thank | moses

The second EES, feeling more and more difficult, the level is getting higher and higher, the reviewers of top journals are also top-level, greatly improved the level of the article after the revision, and addedData can be written in another JMCA-level article, a large article at the top of a small article, continue to strive to achieve better results.

(292) Thank | 88888888

submitted nature energy rejected, after switching to EES, the two reviewers, very serious and responsible, gaveMinor repair.After careful revision, the paper was submitted again after 5 days, and the next day the editor notified the paper to receive it.The journal's influence is extremely high and it is definitely the top in the field.And the journal is very efficient.I hope that the journal will develop better and better.I also hope that I can get more good results published on the EES.

(315) Thank | favor

Reviewed for 3 months, four reviewers, three minor repairs, one refused, gave the opinion of the overhaul.Added a lot of data, revise for more than a month, very worried about sending to the legendary Senior referee.Finally accepted, not easy ah

(107) Thank | vrai

The fourth EES, but this submission has not changed for more than a month. I thought this article is not suitable for this journal, I want to select for a more closely related journal.The boss said to try,,,,,

(30) Thank | Anonymous

is a journal of very cattle, the level of reviewers is high, the requirements are very strict, IF hopes to break through 30 in 16 years. Haha

(42) Thank | 天空

EES Just received an article, submitted on November 4th, received a review opinion on November 18th, a reviewer directly received, a reviewer said no big problem, mention fourMinor problem, edited to minor repair, returned to the revised draft on November 25, received on November 27.The fate of this article is more tragic. The first submission was made on May 1st, 11th. From high to low, it was reviewed by the NC three times. Other reviewers have no problem. One reviewer asks the new big one every time.The problem, did not refuse, but the third trial changed an editor, was rejected, repeated tossing for 6 months, NC really can not afford ah

(16) Thank | 锂电负极

A very good journal in the energy environment!The review is very professional and serious!Very difficult!The rejection rate is as high as 85% or more.

(18) Thank | chen

is strict, 2 reviewers in the first instance, a reviewer has put a lot of opinions, a minor repair, editorial comments to modify - re-submitment.(16 days) After the revision, I did N experiments. Cover wrote nearly 30 pages. After re-submitment for one month, the minor repairs, in addition to the previous two reviewers, found two reviewers.
    The first-instance reviewer who requested the overhaul said that we did nice work (probably we added EELS and EXAFS in a short time) and agreed to accept it.Feeling strict, difficult.Recently, IF has risen, so the request will be stricter.
     I have delivered a manuscript for nearly a month, and I am looking forward to good news!

(5) Thank | tcg

I would like to ask the insect friends who sent EES four months to the news. Is your message for exactly four months still more than four months?I have been submitteding an article for four months. I have no news until now. I am considering whether to send emails to remind me/

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal should specify the editor?How did the article I just selectd go all the way to the under review state.Do not know if it is submitted for review?Or is the editor not assigned?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

submitted a review, after one and a half months, the boss sent a letter to remind, one day after receiving a reply, four reviewers, three comments received a small change, a direct rejection, the editor recommended to publish.However, there were a lot of opinions on the small reforms, and more than 30 pages were written one by one.In general, the journal's draft rate is getting higher and higher, it is estimated that with the if water long ship is high

(0) Thank | Anonymous