September 9, 2011 Submission; September 17, 2011 Technical Check; November 10, 2011 Minor Repair; December 5, 2011; Return revised draft. On December 29, I received the copyright transfer and the school draft on January 9, 2012. On January 23, 2012, I was officially published. The articles must have innovations and the English must be good and acceptable. The speed of reviewing is appropriate, but if a reviewer is not found, it will be very slow.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2018.8.22 Submit2018.11.1 Rework2018.11.4 Submit a return draft2018.11.20 Receiving2018.11.22 OnlineThis empirical model on column adsorption is completed from submission to publication for a total of three months, and praises one.One in favor, one against, the editor gave the overhaul, and after the repair, the editor received it directly for half a month.Not always slow.

(12) Thank | 江湖

5/29/2018,submitted7/14/2018, major revision8/13/2018, repaired9/20/2018, second overhaul10/28/2018, repaired11/2/2018, receivingIn general, the review is still very fast, the reviewers are serious and responsible, and the questions raised are very targeted. After the revision, the quality of the articles has improved significantly.

(0) Thank | exceee

4.22 submit4.23 under review5.19 Invitation to revise6.3 revision submit6.5 accepted6.6 online

(1) Thank | hebutjzy

Received 29 April 2018;Revised request 19 June 2018;Received in revised form 13 August 2018;Accepted 28 August 2018;1 September 2018 The page number and issue volume

(1) Thank | Anonymous

This journal is too slow, it is better to choose faster, more than a few times, and start thinking that the journals in the second district will not be too slow. As a result, the journal is slow to explode.

(1) Thank | 五十五

2018.01.29 Casting2018.02.06 Submitted for review2018.04.01 Return to review comments Overhaul (to two months to modify)2018.04.30 Return to the revised draft2018.05.06 receiving2018.05.07 Internet

(1) Thank | 2332

This speed is the slowest in the journals that have been selectd, wasting time

(2) Thank | jimiro

This journal is really effective in its efficiency. In mid-January, the review was submitted in early March. Because of the large papers, I was dragged to the March 20th to give them feedback.Then one week later, the notice was accepted.

(1) Thank | chenkun

It feels very slow, with editor 18 days, then Reviewer Invited 28 days...I don't know what to do next.

(4) Thank | lvhang@hust.edu.cn

contribution is quite smooth, a reviewer minor repair, a major repair, 2 months of initial review, 3 months to see the journal, the journal's impact factor has grown steadily.

(7) Thank | Arno

published an article on Separation and Purification Technology. The time node information for submission is as follows:2016.05.07 Delivery2016.05.29 Submitted for review2016.12.11 Return to review comments Overhaul (to be revised for two months)2016.12.29 Return to revised version (modification time is 2 weeks)2017.01.01 Receive2017.01.03 Internet

(5) Thank | Anonymous

This speed, I served, the slowest of the journals I selectd, I feel that it is time to paySuch journals will be less and less popular

(2) Thank | 815048960@qq.com

just submitted an article, the editor is R. Aires-Barros, the direction is mineral separation.Who selectd, what about this editor?Thank you!

(1) Thank | jack

surprisingly slow, witheditor 21 days, still not responding, really out of the 歪

(1) Thank | 123123

for the first time, share the experience, I am doing the catalysis, the editor is Chen Guohua,Started voting on April 5On April 28, I received a reply from the overhaul. I am very happy that the editors and reviewers are too fast. One of the reviewers said that they will receive it directly after the revision.May 13 revised draft submittedThe next second trial is very slow, slow and slow.August 16 finally waited for the reception~August 17 gave the doi number to handle copyright.Overall it feels a bit slow, but it's okay, and the journal's impact factor has been rising in the past three years.

(1) Thank | 402963101@qq.com

From submission to giving advice, it took 11 months, several times in the middle, but it was given to Xiao Xiu; after minor repair, it was a long wait, with editor 1Month, urging 2 times... and then for 3 weeks, finally acceptd.2012.06-2013.08, 14 months, directly approaching the lab paper submission cycle!Recommendation: Environmental articles are still under-reported, and the review cycle is very long, which may be the reason for not being able to find reviewers.If there is no response for a long time, it is recommended to send a reminder letter to the editor. It may be that the editor has no time.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

with editor 1 month, no movement, reminder once, still no movement, this editor is really speechless, it seems that environmental articles are still not to select for this journal, super slow, editor is not responsible.Wait a second half, if you can't do it, Grandma's, haven't seen such a junk journal.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

How to use the editor has not been submitted for 1 month?Is this something that people do?It is accurate to say that it is still not submitted for review in 50 days. How to withdraw the draft?

(1) Thank | Anonymous

13Submission of February 7th, 3 months, still under review.July 20, still under review.....

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Received at Editorial Office:31 Aug 2011Article revised:4 Mar 2013Article accepted for publication:8 Mar 2013Received at Elsevier:11 Mar 2013The manuscript is slower, and the review comments are returned in 8 months. Since this article was overhauled twice, the overall 18 months

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review period is very long. After submitting the manuscript, it is about 1 month in the editor's hands, and then it is a long 6-month review. After reviewing the comments,Requires overhaul and reply within 30 days. Expert opinions are more pertinent and received after overhaul.Submitted on June 29, 2012, retired on January 20, 2013, received on March 11, 2013, I don’t know when I saw it

(1) Thank | Anonymous

graphic abstract Is it necessary, I don’t know how to do it,Please prawn pointing

(0) Thank | Anonymous

just selectd out at noon, selected Bart Van der Bruggen for editing, the future is unknown!I hope it will be faster.Helpless, our line seems to have no foreign journals to select for.Ps I am a rare earth metal preparation and purification, prawn know what journals can be submited?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Received at Editorial Office:11 Apr 2012Article revised:1 Oct 2012Article accepted for publication:6 Oct 2012Received at Elsevier:9 Oct 2012

(0) Thank | Anonymous