Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

APPLIED ENERGY

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[APPLIED ENERGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 236891 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleAPPLIED ENERGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsAPPL ENERG
ISSN0306-2619
h-index162
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
9.543.4552.616
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Building and Construction
Q11 / 168
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Q12 / 288
Category: Energy
Subcategory: General Energy
Q12 / 58
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Q17 / 579

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)24.30%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/apen/
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1975
Annual Article Volume1798
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0306-2619%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.9 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 5.8 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Moderate
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 8.7 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【APPLIED ENERGY】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on APPLIED ENERGY: Write a review
Author: wanggang


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-12 11:37:07
Recently, I submitted a paper on solar energy to AE. In my opinion, this journal is highly efficient and helpful. The submission to acceptance timeline is about one month. In addition, the reviewers provide a lot of constructive feedback, raise excellent questions, modify the language of the paper and format the references. The editor even provided some feedback, which was very appreciated. The only negative aspect of this journal is that there are very high requirements; formatting must be perfect and every detail needs to be in line. In October, the number of submissions was more than 8,000, and AE published more than 1,000 articles throughout the year.

(18) Thank | wanggang

Author: Lukai


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-02 23:21:17
I started submiting in January 2018 and selectd for the first draft. After 2 days of editing, I refused. I said that it was not enough. After I changed it, I selectd for the second draft.Refused, saying that innovation is not enough, the third draft was submitted, I think the editor sees me so persistent, I was touched by me...Haha...Then I sent it to the test after 7 days. At this time, it was already in April, and it was 6 months. In October, the review was down. 4 people replied to 2, and all said yes, let me change it slightly. Editing limited me 2After the week was over, I handed over the status that I had been submitting for review for 2 months, but no one looked at it. Later, I finally under review. I was so embarrassed in my heart. After half a month, I said that I agreed to accept it. My tears will come out.After a year, the practice was rejected 2 times, but fortunately I did not give up...Thanks all
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | Lukai

Author: 小7


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-02 14:55:04
High demand, first submission, editorThe rejection of the manuscript allowed for a portion of the content to be re-submited, the second select, and the external trial, which lasted for 4 months, and the intermediate date was changed three times, such as sending three external trials.The result of the return is that there is a lack of innovation (say other people have done similar, I really don't know), and other opinions are very detailed.Make a good revision and prepare to re-submit journals with similar scores.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 小7

Author: Raffaello


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 9.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-05 14:28:21
The review was too slow, and the first trial took more than nine months, but the period was not reminded.The three review comments, two minor repairs and one rejection, the results refused, the reviewers who refused to have only the lack of innovation.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Raffaello

Author: sam


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-09 17:25:05
1. Three submissions before and after, each time sent to the external audit, the average 3.5 month period, there is oneThe reviewer's opinion was negative, and the editors directly rejected the draft.2. It seems that the current review cycle has become longer.4. Read the articles in the journal, there is substance, and the personal feeling is not bad.3. The last time you selectd for this journal, no, no longer submit.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | sam

Author: 844269083@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-27 11:51:33
Let’s share my sad story, it’s just a deputystory.Briefing: On April 1, 2018, the first article was submitted to Applied Energy. The initial review was 4 and a half months, and it was not until August 20 that the preliminary review was given and rejected.Two reminder letters were sent in the middle.On July 1, 2018, the second article was submitted to Appied Energy. The status of Reviewer invited lasted for more than a month, and it was still not submitted for review.And both articles are responsible for the same deputy editor.Until now, it is a history of blood and tears...
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | 844269083@qq.com

Author: riversunok@126.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-18 18:59:09
This journal is not a veteran journal in the field of power systems. However, in recent years, more and more articles on power system applications have been submitted to the above, and the degree of attention is gradually increasing.In general, the quality is rising, and the opinions given by the reviewers are relatively pertinent. It really helps to improve the quality of the papers.* Submitted the first draft on April 8, 2018.* On June 16, 2018, the first-instance revision was received.The modification time given is relatively short, and it is required to return to the modified version in about three weeks (if it is not completed, it seems that you can send a letter to the editor to request an extension of the modification time).A total of four reviewers were found. The reviewers generally thought that they were well written. The first reviewers’ opinions were relatively difficult to answer, questioning the innovation of the papers, and the other three reviewers’ relatively good answers.Mainly add experiments, add discussion, change typos.* Submitted on July 5, 2018, in accordance with the revised opinion of the first instance.* On July 18, 2018, the applicant received the employment email. The reviewers were basically satisfied with the changes made. One of the reviewers looked very carefully and found two typos, requesting to modify the typos and submit.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | riversunok@126.com

Author: 707145297@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-11 19:10:25
A very good journal, the processing speed is quite fast, the article must reflect its application value, this journal has the equivalent requirements for the integrity and innovation of the introduction.high!Go ahead, come on!Everyone shares: 72554986
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 707145297@qq.com

Author: wangdawei_china@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-05 08:18:32
The truth is that this journal is very bullish, not to say how high the level is, but the impact factor is high, and the number of people who select.Generally, the first submission is definitely rejected. The reason is that the innovation is not strong, or the number of articles cited is too small.After the revision, you can select again and you can submit a review to explain your article.The three judges were rejected if they disagreed.The three people are judged by the judges, and the two are extremely serious and benefit a lot.But there is a judge who does not give advice. There is only one sentence: REFECT, the reason is that there is no creativity.His NND
Show Review in Original Language
(18) Thank | wangdawei_china@163.com

Author: 高原雨


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-21 21:55:17
2018 The manuscript submitted in January is still in review, it has been 4 months.I hope that I will not be rejected, or I will waste a lot of time.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 高原雨

Author: 蒲公英


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-21 16:16:46
reviewing speed is very fast, 30 days, two reviewers.The reviewer's opinion is very professional, and the innovation requirements of the paper are very high.The impact factor of this journal has risen very quickly and it is getting harder and harder to select.
Show Review in Original Language
(31) Thank | 蒲公英

Author: reviewer 1


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-17 03:44:35
CO2 Enhanced oil recovery research, because this journal does not have a petroleum-related classification, and the scope of the submitment is CCS.The editor-in-chief asked for more research on the CO2 emission reduction, which did not require much research on petroleum and was rejected without a trial.The editor-in-chief is very high and has a fire eye.Before submiting in oil, you must first evaluate and evaluate yourself. If the oil is too close, there is no need to select.
Show Review in Original Language
(15) Thank | reviewer 1

Author: haiyun27@126.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-11 08:57:53
2017.12.13Submission, 2017.1.10 rejection, reviewFour reviewers, returning three, directly rejecting the manuscript.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | haiyun27@126.com

Author: zhangguojie2015@cumt.edu.cn


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-06 12:59:18
Received 19 October 2017;Received in revised form 3 January 2018;Accepted 4 January 2018Overall, the journal is very fast, the results of the review within three weeks are definitely known, and the three reviewers who submitted the review are very nice!This journal is very important to the idea, the text requirements are not particularly high, as long as the idea is good, other follow-up can be modified, if the idea is not good, may not be submitted for review, once submitted for review, basically will not be rejected!
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | zhangguojie2015@cumt.edu.cn

Author: ERICCHIANG


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-19 10:33:01
2017年19月19日appliedEnergy immediate impact factor = 18860/2807 = 6.719This year will definitely be 7 points, but it is estimated that it will not reach 8 points.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ERICCHIANG

Author: 1172940972@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-18 13:31:57
Photocatalytic hydrogen production, one week refused
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1172940972@qq.com

Author: gintoki


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-17 13:35:13
The editor is quite good, but I feel that the reviewer may be a peer, saying a bunch of problems that did not appear in my article, directly refused, by the way, this oneThe reviewer reviewed for two months and sent a reminder letter to me after a few days. I can say that I am very unwilling. I wrote a complaint letter and I don’t know what it will be...
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | gintoki

Author: cyt_cn@126.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-02 10:49:09
Submitted at the end of November 2016Receive feedback on February 12, 2017Submit changes on March 13, 2017Accepted on April 16, 2017The feedback is more pertinent and helpful for the promotion of the article.The three reviewers responded positively, but the editor had some comments on the article and later revised it.The reviewer also helped me find a serious clerical error, a bit embarrassing...However, the review speed is quite fast, a good journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(22) Thank | cyt_cn@126.com

Author: tangjia1992@126.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-15 10:58:17
The review speed is very fast, the expert opinion is very good.
Show Review in Original Language
(22) Thank | tangjia1992@126.com

Author: 625221345@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-11 21:21:08
A very good journal, the processing speed is quite fast, the requirements of the energy field is relatively high, the article must reflect its application value, this journal is part of the introductionThe requirements for integrity and innovation are quite high!The following is the submission process:Received at Editorial Office2 Jun 2017Back to comments 17 July (a minor repair, a major overhaul, mainly related to innovation and detail)Article revised5 Aug 2017Article accepted for publication20 Aug 2017
Show Review in Original Language
(25) Thank | 625221345@qq.com

Author: 缺氧的树叶


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-27 13:09:02
I saw a lot of people's submission experience and process on the small woodworm, and now I can finally share my own submission experience with you. The following is probably my submission experience.And the process, I hope to give other friends a little reference, but also to commemorate and celebrate their first PAPER was successfully received by APPLIED ENERGY.2017-3-4 Submitted to journal2017-3-5 With editor2017-3-9 With associate editor2017-4-16 Under review2017-6-12 Revise2017-6-26 R1 submitted to journal2017-6-27 With editor2017-7-2 Uner review11 Aug 2017 Revise2017-8-21 R2 submitted to journal2017-8-22 With editor2017-8-27 Accept
Show Review in Original Language
(27) Thank | 缺氧的树叶

Author: 缺氧的树叶


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-27 13:08:56
has seen many people's submission experience and process on the small woodworm, and now I can finally share my own submission experience with you. The following is probably my submission experience and process, I hope to giveOther friends have a little reference, and to commemorate and celebrate their first PAPER was successfully received by APPLIED ENERGY.2017-3-4 Submitted to journal2017-3-5 With editor2017-3-9 With associate editor2017-4-16 Under review2017-6-12 Revise2017-6-26 R1 submitted to journal2017-6-27 With editor2017-7-2 Uner review11 Aug 2017 Revise2017-8-21 R2 submitted to journal2017-8-22 With editor2017-8-27 Accept
Show Review in Original Language
(12) Thank | 缺氧的树叶

Author: Geothermal


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-05 16:01:56
I have paid attention to some articles about geothermal in this journal. I feel that the quality is quite good.Try it.
Show Review in Original Language
(25) Thank | Geothermal

Author: 456


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-15 20:46:46
Submitted for nearly 2 months, how is it with With Editor, what?Does not meet the requirements of the journals, and does not delay the conversion of other journals...
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 456

Author: WDD


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-26 18:35:34
The journal paper needs to be checked, the repetition rate of regular articles should not exceed 35%, and the repetition rate of review articles should not exceed 40%;The quality requirements are very high; the old journals have become more and more influential factors in recent years, and the review is becoming more and more strict.
Show Review in Original Language
(19) Thank | WDD

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [APPLIED ENERGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*