X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL]Hello, you are Visitor Number 461776 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Journal Title AbbreviationsCHEM ENG J
ISSN1385-8947
h-index172
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
15.202.3152.177
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Q12 / 340
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q15 / 115
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemical Engineering
Q19 / 281
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemistry
Q122 / 398

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)11.80%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/601273/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/CEJ
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE SA, PO BOX 564, LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND, 1001
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationSWITZERLAND
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1996
Annual Article Volume2508
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1385-8947%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.7 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 3.9 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 93%
Data from Elsevier: 18%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 4 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    5    6    7    8    9    10    11    Next    Last  (To Page
/11)
  Reviews on CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL: Write a review
Author: zhouzhen@shiep.edu.cn


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-07-03 21:08:44
Edit Marc A. Deshusses Very kind, today is the third CEJ I was acceptd, the first review 11In the month, the editor saw that the reviewer did not return the comments, and directly looked at the revised comments and then acceptd them.The latter two reviewers are about three months, each time the opinions of the two reviewers are directly revised.Many thanks to Dr. Marc A. Deshusses, who is very responsible and considerate the
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | zhouzhen@shiep.edu.cn

Author: zhouzhen@shiep.edu.cn


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-07-03 21:08:26
Edit Marc A. Deshusses Very kind, today is the third I have been acceptd.The CEJ, the first review for 11 months, the editor did not review the reviewer's return, directly looked at the revised comments, and then acceptd.The latter two reviewers are about three months, each time the opinions of the two reviewers are directly revised.Many thanks to Dr. Marc A. Deshusses, very responsible and considerate
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | zhouzhen@shiep.edu.cn

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-06-26 14:55:21
changed to CEJ after being rejected by other journals, submitted on May 8th, and returned on May 25th, two reviewers, a total of 15 questions, after the change, pressed on the tutorThere, the revised manuscript was sent back to the editorial office on the evening of June 23, and was directly acceptd on the afternoon of the 24th.The efficiency of CEJ editing is too high~Zanyi
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 小小JU


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-09-24 17:54:01
Edit is not bad, accepted after overhaul
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 小小JU

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-30 10:29:00
5.22 Submission 6.1 Technical review is not closed, refused to draft 6.11 Modified after re-submitment 6.17 Technical review but closed 6.18 modified and re-submited 9.13 overhaul (given for five weeks)Time) (three reviewers) 10.17 Overhaul return 11.24 minor repair (giving four weeks) 11.27 minor repair returns 11.30 Accepted
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-15 12:31:00
Received at Editorial Office: 9 Aug 2013 Article revised: 25 Oct 2013 Article accepted for publication: 11 Nov 2013 Received at Elsevier: 13 Nov 2013 5 trialsManuscript, overhaul, accepted, Jesus Santamaria editor-in-chief is not bad
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-12 15:04:00
The first time, only half a year later, there is news, tragedy.After the revision, the manuscript was resubmitted, and he waited for another three months. He requested a minor change and submitted it for acceptance.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-01 11:57:00
Can anyone tell me why the article on Volume228 is not retrieved on web of science???
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-30 09:42:00
July 25 after submitting the manuscript with the editor for nearly a month, and then under review.Fortunately, on September 30th, the review comments were given. A total of 6 reviewers were sent, and 5 comments were given. There were excellent and very poor opinions; King Editor gave a general review.The revised draft will be submitted on October 24.Received on October 29.Thank you, King of Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-27 21:33:00
Speed ​​is not normal fast,Dionysios D. Dionysiou This editor is very good, but also made a journal cover, hehe.The whole submission process is still very smooth. The repair is said to be a major overhaul. In fact, it has not been repaired. It is to add a few error lines to the map. After all, the two reviewers agreed to receive it, and raised a total of five small questions.8. 12 Submit in journal8. 13 Editor invited8. 14 Technical Check in Progress8. 16 Submissions Sent Back t
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-26 09:26:00
Reviewing the draft for about 80 days, after the revisit, the editor is very good, 3 people review the manuscript, one receives, one rejects the manuscript, one only says that it needs to be revisedDid not say refused and refused, the final editor gave the opportunity to make repairs and then make a decision, and finally accepted 5 days after the repair.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-12 15:07:00
8Submission on the 15th of the month, reviewing the draft for one month, after RRC waited for 14 days, reminded me, learned that the comments of the two reviewers came back, the editor was waiting for the third review draftPeople, the third reviewer returned on the third day (estimated editor urged him), the comments given on September 30th minor repair, R1: direct acceptance; R2: work is very valuable, that is, some places did not say clearly letClearly, the test conditions are written in detail, and the discussion section adds a few words; R3: It is very suitable for publication on CEJ, and raises two small questions.Modify the upload, accept it after one week, feel the editor directly to see it yourself, did not return to the reviewer, in fact, the change is still quite a lot!Thanks to the editors and reviewers!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-10 02:12:00
Jul 30 Submitted to JournalAug 3 With EditorAug 3 Under ReviewAug 26 Under ReviewSep 3 Required review completedSep 3 major revision (Editor decision), two reviewers, opinions are very sharp. Oct 6
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-08 09:28:00
8月22投出, September 25th review comments returned, overhaul, October 4th return submission, October 7th reception, very fast, Allen editor too to force
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-05 16:30:00
Now CEJ's requirements are much higher than in previous years, the concept of engineering is more emphasized, and the innovation is also stricter, hope is getting better
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-01 10:31:00
is quite equivalentFast, the first day with the editor the next day reject.Not your own level?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-29 12:02:00
is not the journal's accepted article, the editor will invite the cover ah
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-09 16:33:00
8.30submitted9.5with editor9.8reject The editor wrote back to meThe data on the graph needs to be averaged three times. After I have finished the manuscript, I can submit the manuscript with a new paper. However, I have to specify the resubmission after the rejection, and then I will write it after I submit it.Letter.What do you mean by this?Is there still hope?At the beginning, the little boss asked me to select for CEJ because I didn't do this direction in the future. The boss didn't want me to spend a lot of time on this paper. He felt that the level of this article was very poor, let me hurry out.If, according to the requirements of the editor, each curve is taken three times,
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-08 17:31:00
is rejected by a journal and CEJ is selectd.Then let the big change, after the change, successfully received...5.31: Investment 8.15: Great change 8.22: Post-revision 9.4: Receive summary, speed is ok.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-05 11:21:00
The fastest submission.Submitted around 8.15, under review of No. 20, 26 changed under review, 9.4 overhaul.Less than 20 days before and after..At this speed, I was surprised by my friends..
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-04 08:28:00
with editor More than 10 days?Is it normal?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-30 15:51:00
20130830 Submitted to journal20130902 Editor invited20130903 Technical Check in Progress20130905 With editor20130909 Under review20130920 Under review
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-15 17:48:00
2013.5.3Submission, 2013.6.25 overhaul, 2013.7.22, 2013.8.1 received, 2013.8.17 submitted a copyright agreement and other forms.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-14 14:09:00
CEJFeb 03 submit in journalFeb 09 send back to authorFeb 19 technical check in progressFeb 22 with editorFeb 28 under reviewApr 06 under reviewApr 13 reject
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-23 17:24:00
in the middle of the law, contribute 3The monthly feedback, an ok, a rejection, a major repair, thanks to the editor of Dionysios for the opportunity to return, the letter said that the return will be returned to the reviewer, as long as there is a disagreement to hang.Fortunately, the review comments can be answered without fatal injuries.According to the comments of the reviewers, answer and supplement some experiments.Going back for a month, the reviewer is very satisfied with the answer.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    5    6    7    8    9    10    11    Next    Last  (To Page
/11)

Start your review of [CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service