CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL

KingLun Yeung this editor is too slow, with the editor to engage in 2 months, modified, and editor with two months, speechless...Half a year, also with editor

(5) Thank | 1111

April 2. 2018 submittedApril 3. 2018 with editorApril 6. 2018 under reviewApril 18. 2018 under editor evalutionApril 24. 2018 under editor evalutionMay 6. 2018 major revisionMay 22. 2018 revisions submittedMay 26. 2018 with editorMay 28. 2018 acceptedMay 29. 2018 proof

(2) Thank | chensisi21@126.com

Awesome journal, the impact factor climbs all the way, the reviewer's opinion is very pertinent, hope to be better and better~

(1) Thank | 木木

Very good journal

(2) Thank | houhuilin86@163.com

03 Feb 2018----17 May 2018 Completed - AcceptThe impact factor is getting higher and higher, and the requirements are getting higher. The reply plus text has written 99 pages..

(6) Thank | 巛朔zp

underReview only 5 days on Under Editor Evaluation, I feel that it is a tragedy.

(2) Thank | 2602149462@qq.com

5 On the 5th of the select, I finally submitted the review today. I am looking forward to the good news. Some news is updated here.

(2) Thank | 572020211@qq.com

5 on the 5th select, today finally submitted for review, looking forward to good news, there is news the first time inUpdated here.

(0) Thank | 572020211@qq.com

2018 Submitted on January 26, 2.25 under review, still under review, too slow!

(1) Thank | cuili.123@163.com

06 Feb 2018 Initial Date submitted14 Feb 2018 Under review21 Mar 2018 Major revision20 Apr Resubmitted21 Apr AccceptThe review comments will be returned in about 40 days.As long as it is carefully revised, the possibility of returning to the editor for direct reception is still very high.Be sure to write the Response letter.The main reason is that the preliminary review is not particularly fast, and the latter will be very fast.

(3) Thank | 466211505@qq.com

submitted 18.02.03Under review 18.02.13Major revision 18.03.15Revision submitted 18.04.02Accepted 18.04.15Proof, online 18.04.16Editor:Prof. Todd Hoare.In the first instance, the status returned will become the under editor evalution; in the second instance, the return status is required reviewers completed.The editing process is very fast, and I hope that the influence of CEJ is getting higher and higher!

(7) Thank | xyjpolymers@163.com

2018-02-11 submitted to journal2018-02-13 with editor2018-02-15 under review2018-02-27 under editor evaluation2018-03-01 under editor evaluation2018-03-12 under editor evaluation2018-03-14 major revision2018-04-10 submitted to journal2018-04-11 with editor2018-04-13 acceptThe overall speed is quite fast, one month of overhaul, the actual modification time is completed in 7 days, and it is delayed until April 10th to return to repair!No further review, the editor receives it directly!Thanks to editor Tejraj Aminabhavi!I wish you all the best!

(6) Thank | WSTBK

with editorTwo months, what kind of ghost

(2) Thank | 一头牛

has been submitted for four months, still in the editor's hand

(0) Thank | 1234556

20180329 The real-time impact factor is 6.64, which is expected to rise to July.6.8

(1) Thank | 要什么昵称

submitted 2017.10.16Under review 2017.10.22Major revision 2018.2.5 (four reviewers)Authorized submitted 2018.2.15Major revision 2018.3.12 (also the four reviewers in the first trial)Revision submitted 2018.3.14Accept 2018.3.15On line 2018.3.16

(4) Thank | 344869599@qq.com

submitted 12.08Under review 12.22Major revision 1.28Revision submitted 2.13Major revision 3.06Revision submitted 3.14Minor revision 3.16Revision submitted 3.16Accept 3.17Editor:DionSecond reviewer reviewer

(2) Thank | 291101294@qq.com

has been rejected by the editor for two days, saying that it does not meet the scope of the journal.The editor is a very good journal of marin.

(2) Thank | kiss

selectd not to be edited in two days, said that it does not meet the scope of the journal.The editor is marin.

(3) Thank | kiss

9th Feb 2018 IF=20248/3098=6.540 It should be super last year~

(0) Thank | ericchiang

sent the trial for less than a week on the under editor evaluation, is it a tragedyYeah

(1) Thank | Ty

9.9Submission11.18 notice to overhaul12.14 return12.29 notification article reception12.30proof copyright, etc.12.30 online distribution doiExperience: You must be in a serious and responsible attitude, on the data, on the paper, there is one to say two, two, the editor respects the opinions of the reviewers, because they are really professional.

(2) Thank | 3456@163.com

Received 19 October 2017;Received in revised form 15 December 2017;Accepted 16 December 2017;Available online 17 December 2017.The waiting process is more difficult, but the results are more positive: one accepts, one minor repair; the next day after the reply is received;Online, page number (17.12.20.) are very fast, thanks to the editor Professor Todd Hoare.The first SCI, it is not easy to continue, continue to cheer!

(5) Thank | xyjpolymers@163.com

Received 19 October 2017;Received in revised form 15 December 2017;Accepted 16 December 2017;Available online 17 December 2017.The waiting process is more difficult, but the results are more positive: one accept, one minor repair; the next day after the reply; the online, the page number (17.12.20.) are very fast, thanks to the editor Professor Todd Hoare.The first SCI, it is not easy to continue, continue to cheer!

(0) Thank | xyjpolymers@163.com

Received 19 October 2017;Received in revised form 15 December 2017;Accepted 16 December 2017;Available online 17 December 2017.The waiting process is more difficult, but the results are more positive: one accept, one minor repair; the next day after the reply; the online, the page number (17.12.20.) are very fast, thanks to the editor Professor Todd Hoare.The first SCI, it is not easy to continue, continue to cheer!

(1) Thank | xyjpolymers@163.com