X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL]Hello, you are Visitor Number 461231 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Journal Title AbbreviationsCHEM ENG J
ISSN1385-8947
h-index172
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
15.202.3152.177
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Q12 / 340
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q15 / 115
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemical Engineering
Q19 / 281
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemistry
Q122 / 398

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)11.80%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/601273/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/CEJ
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE SA, PO BOX 564, LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND, 1001
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationSWITZERLAND
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1996
Annual Article Volume2508
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1385-8947%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.7 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 3.9 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 93%
Data from Elsevier: 18%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 4 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/11)
  Reviews on CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL: Write a review
Author: pHD


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-03-07 16:18:42
2019.11.09, submitted; 2020.01.01, major revision; 2020.02.02, resubmitted; 2020.02.26, minor revision; 2020.030.5, accept; 2020.03.06, online. There were 3 reviewers, 2 minor revisions and 1 rejection. The editor will not reject the article for a reviewer without considering other reviews’ comments. The attitude is the first; please cherish the revision chance. In this paper, an organic porous adsorbent is prepared by click polymerization, which utilizes the synergy of dipole-π and π-π stacking to efficiently adsorb TNT. Title: A simple approach to prepare isoxazoline-based porous polymer for the highly effective adsorption of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT): catalyst-free click polymerization between an in situ generated nitrile oxide with polybutadienehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124674

(10) Thank | pHD

Author: zzl13


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-11-07 00:55:05
During my master's degree, two articles were submitted and eventually accepted by Chemical Engineering Journal. I feel that the editor Dimitris I. Kondarides, Ph.D. in the field of new materials was nice, and the processing articles efficiency was very high. I wish Chemical Engineering Journal to be better. Share my complete submission process for your reference, and I wish you good luck! 06 Sep 2019, submitted to journal; 09 Sep, resubmitted (technical check); 09 Sep, submitted to journal; 13 Sep, with editor; 13 Sep, under review; 17 Sep, under editor evaluation; 19 Sep, under editor evaluation; 06 Oct, under editor evaluation; 09 Oct, revision (editor decision: Major Revision) (two minor revisions, two major revisions); 23 Oct, revision submitted to journal; 25 Oct, with editor; 25 Oct, under review; 06 Nov 2019, completed accept.

(15) Thank | zzl13

Author: Gouji Ye


Subject Area: Multidisciplinary
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-09-16 11:09:13
Let me share the submission experience and thoughts with you. The manuscript was submitted on August 7th, 2018. The turnaround time for the first review was approximately 35 days. The four reviewers asked nearly 20 questions in total. Generally speaking, the comments were relatively positive. A major revision was required by the editor, who let me revise it in 30 days. The actual revision time used was 30 days. The revision was sent back on October 11th, 2018. The acceptance notification was received on October 26th, 2018. The turnaround time for the second review was 15 days. The entire review process was relatively fast. The editors and reviewers were particularly responsible and rigorous. Sufficient and systematic data support are also needed on the basis of innovation. Chemical Engineering Journal gave me a deep impression at two points: (1) The number of reviewers is generally more than that of other journals. For materials science and engineering-new energy journals, the number of reviewers is usually 2–3, but CEJ usually invite 4–5 reviewers. It's harder to get accepted in this case. The advantage is that such evaluations are more objective and comprehensive, which is of great help to the improvement of the article. In addition, being able to convince so many reviewers one by one is also powerful affirmation of their own work. (2) In my opinion, the articles on CEJ show higher practical value than other similar journals. Finally, let me introduce the work of this article. It is about the preparation and characterization of graphene film materials and their application in flexible supercapacitors. The article can be downloaded at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.187. I hope to learn, communicate and make progress together with you.

(15) Thank | Gouji Ye

Author: Tammy


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-18 09:45:30
Dealing with the reviewers’ edits and suggestions was time-consuming and exhausting. It took about 3 months for the entire submission process to be complete. Despite the amount of comments provided by the reviewers, they were professional and supportive (I think they knew I was a graduate student, haha). Planning to submit my next manuscript to this journal!

(3) Thank | Tammy

Author: Cowadopt


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-25 22:19:18
2018-11-16 submitted to journal2018-11-23 with editor2018-12-05 under review2019-01-23 under editor evaluation2019-01-25 major revision2019-02-19 submitted to journal2019-02-21 Accept
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Cowadopt

Author: Adou


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-25 04:44:44
2018-11-16 submitted to journal
2018-11-23 with editor
2018-12-05 under review
2019-01-23 under editor evaluation 
2019-01-25 major revision
2019-02-19 submitted to journal
2019-02-21 Accept
效率很高,给的大修,但其实是改变一下文章结构,提交后两天接受,一天之后online。
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Adou

Author: xm


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-17 23:52:15
After submitting the manuscript for a few days, I will submit it for review. Then I will return the review comments after one week. After two minor repairs, one will be speechless. I refuse to submit the manuscript and say that I am not working well.The editor gave the overhaul, then modified it for about 10 days, returned, and accepted it two days later.Thanks to Allen for editing, really good!The first sci, do the adsorption material
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | xm

Author: Expecto


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-02 23:47:38
11.19 submit11.23 under review12.21 major revision, during which two under editor evaluations, there should be two reviewers who come back and start this state, each time one will change time, a total of four reviewers, two minor repairs1.20 Submit a revised draft, the day under review2.2 required reviews completed2.2 acceptThe first sci, very lucky, thanks to Prof.Allen and AE Prof. Pan, Professor Pan is really super efficient, super praise
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Expecto

Author: 倚天利剑


Subject Area: Multidisciplinary
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-26 15:14:21
cej Immediate impact factor: 28962/3576=8.10.Has broken 8!
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 倚天利剑

Author: chocoring


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-24 20:38:24
CEJ immediate impact factor: 28895/3576=8.08.Has broken 8!
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | chocoring

Author: 猜猜看


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-09 16:50:56
2018.10.3 Contribution2018.11.19 overhaul2018.12.17 back draft2018.1.8 Accepted after the second instanceModifications are positive comments.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 猜猜看

Author: HazelZhang


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-17 10:31:24
2018.07 submitted2018.09 major revision2018.10 revisions submitted2018.12 acceptElectrocatalytic direction, because the manuscript backlog second period is very long ~ good article is accepted smoothly, Sahua ~
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | HazelZhang

Author: 倚天利剑


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-12 20:32:20
One district, the district is a district, immediate impact factor: 27295/3576=7.633
Show Review in Original Language
(19) Thank | 倚天利剑

Author: Levis


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-12 19:48:20
The district 1 district is a district that is getting more and more powerful and more difficult to select.A good influence factor will break through 7.5 next year?
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | Levis

Author: 子卿


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-11 14:59:44
Received 21 September 2018;Received in revised form 30 November 2018;Accepted 5 December 2018.One-and-a-half months after the submission, the reviewers received comments. The two reviewers, the first one was very high, six small opinions, and the second one might not understand the article and put forward an opinion.The cost was close to one month and the instructor negotiated to answer the review comments, and received them directly within a few days after submission.I always wanted to select for CEJ. The first article was directly rejected and transferred to the IECR.I didn’t report much hope this time, and the review comments were very good.Haha
Show Review in Original Language
(60) Thank | 子卿

Author: 偶歪恩


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-10 20:13:27
7.20 Submission10.13 Return to overhaul 3 reviewers The first one directly said that it is not suitable. The other two are just asking to amend11.12 Submit a revised draft11.28 Return to minor repair The first one says to add a point reference to OK. The other two have no opinion.12.04 Submit a second revision12.06 Receiving12.07 onlineNow waiting for page numberOverall, it was OK. I thought it would be because the first reviewer was directly rejected. However, it suddenly became a surprise..Editor is Dion
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 偶歪恩

Author: KIH


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-28 09:10:15
Submitted at the end of September this year, 5 days for review, 1 month after the editor decided to overhaul, November 26 for overhaul, November 27 for reception, the first SCI, thank CEJEdited by Stephen Allen, I wish CEJ better and better!
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | KIH

Author: 1_木木


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-23 14:25:39
Delivered and rejected.Angry is rejected by an Assistant Professor...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1_木木

Author: Ericchiang


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-17 16:48:41
2018/11/17 even if the impact factor = 26482/3614 = 7.3282017/12/6 Immediate Impact Factor=18600/3098=6.0042016/12/3 Immediate Impact Factor = 5.224From December to June 17th, it rose by 0.7, and the 19-year CEJ impact factor is likely to reach 8 points.
Show Review in Original Language
(14) Thank | Ericchiang

Author: joyce


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-15 10:27:08
submitted 7.27Under reviewMajor revision 9.14Authorized submitted 10.10Accept 10.14I was also invited to the cover, happy for a while, and then found out that everyone will receive such an invitation if they are received...
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | joyce

Author: Ross


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-05 09:31:18
8.9 Submission10.04Receive
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Ross

Author: Jeffreyyz


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-25 08:02:00
So the experiment was completed for two months, not because the experiment itself was difficult to do, but because there was no experimental instrument.The editor gave a month to modify, but after the application was extended for one month, he finally found the instrument that could be done and added the experiment.The modification has been submitted for one month and is still in the UNDER REVIEW state. The result is unknown.It feels like there will be results in about two weeks.Responding to the question about why CHEMICAL ENGINEERING is a chemical engineering, there will be so many material chemistry articles, personally think that the REVIEW itself is now divided into three SECTIONS, one for Chemical Reaction Engineering, one for Environmental Chemical Engineering, and the other for SeparateIt is Novel Materials for Energy and Advanced Applications.After all, the material and chemistry are hot, and if you want to improve IF, please include some hot material research articles like GO, MOF, etc. It should be able to improve the reference.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Jeffreyyz

Author: Jeffreyyz


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-25 08:01:27
02/05/2018 Submission03/05/2018 With Editor09/05/2018 Under Review04/06/2018 Under Review20/06/2018 Under Editor Evaluation20/06/2018 Under Review25/06/2018 Major correction23/08/2018 Revision submission24/08/2018 With Editor24/08/2018 Under ReviewI have to say that the review is really slow.The direction of the work is energy storage coating, which is more biased towards material chemistry.Although the methods and materials themselves are not new, the results reported are innovative.There should be at least four REVIEWERS in the first instance (because DECISION comes back three FEEDBACK numbers are REVIEWER 1, 2, 4), after the final three REVIEWs, there should be no more waiting for the fourth result, the editor gave MAJOR CORRECTION according to REVIEW, the reasonIt is the three people who simultaneously propose no representations on the backend application.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Jeffreyyz

Author: 572020211qq


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-19 22:53:17
4.5 months, finally accepted, overall the reviewer is very rigorous, although the process is relatively long, the result is still good
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 572020211qq

Author: 西科狼鹰


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-08 17:35:37
2017-10-10 submission2018-06-13 revise2018-08-07 revised manuscript submission2018-09-07 accepted
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 西科狼鹰

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/11)

Start your review of [CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service