24 days to first decision. Here's what I have to say: 1 Be sure to read the guideline for authors in detail; 2 Recommending reviewers is very important.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

20170408 Submitted20170410 with editor20170515 under review20170619 major revision20170711 submitted by20170721 accepted20180614 submitted20180616 with editor20180702 under review20180628 minor revision20180947 submitted20181001 acceptedThe first and second articles of the doctoral period, although a bit long, are quite smooth, thanks to the editor Matthias Beller!

(8) Thank | 洛

5.30 Submission7.11 Received review comments, two reviewers, one of which is the editor himself, not many problems, overhaul7.22 Back7.24 Receive, the editor should be no longer submitted for reviewI selectd for ACS Catalysis, and after half a year, I was rejected after the overhaul. I changed the Journal of Catalysis

(1) Thank | xwgd8@mst.edu

with editor is 1 month, the status has not changed, is this to be rejected?

(0) Thank | 179612856@qq.com

The top journal of chemical industry, in a certain sense, the position in the chemical industry is equivalent to the position of JACS in the chemical direction.We always wanted to send an article, but they were all rejected.The manuscript that was dropped was sent to Green Chem.I finally published an article recently.This journal has high requirements for the integrity of the work and a higher requirement for the mechanism.

(26) Thank | yl

was sent to a Japanese editor, and he was directly rejected after three minutes of watching. What a ghost, too irresponsible.

(6) Thank | 1940587934@qq.com

Submission 3 days with editor, 7 days direct rejection, no reason

(0) Thank | shengzhongjin1992@126.com

Submission experience for your reference, industrial catalytic articlesSubmitted 2017050520170509 with editor20170515 under review20170621 major revision20170711 submitted by20170712 with editor20170720 accepted

(34) Thank | licunyao2008@163.com

The review was more rigorous. I found four reviewers in the first instance and three months of review. Among them, I was anxious, and I reminded the boss to remind me of the manuscript. The boss said that he didn’t remind me every time. The result was two and a half months.The boss was also anxious, and he rushed. The result was: three comments back, and one did not come back.Three months later, the review comments came back.Three minor repairs, one rejection, and the editor of nice gave the opportunity to modify.The reviewers gave their pertinent opinions and suggestions. They were very professional. When the data was completed, the draft had a lot of progress from the data and the argumentation of the results, and learned a lot from it!After a month of revision, it was successfully received.As a person who is a polymer, I am very lucky!

(2) Thank | wuyuan

The first trial is very fast, and both reviewers recommend overhaul.One of the reviewers raised a lot of questions, mainly because some academic views were in conflict with the articles published by the reviewers.Later, the theory was verified and revised for more than four months (applied to the editorial department for extension of the modification time), which proved that there is no contradiction between our opinions and the reviewers' opinions. The substantive problems after the superficial phenomenon are the same.Five days after the overhaul was sent back, a minor repair was given, and the small repair was sent back three days later.Feelings of reviewers are key, and reviewers' opinions are sharp and demanding.It takes a lot of patience to respond and try to meet the reviewer's request.

(0) Thank | 570385974@qq.com

The review speed is very fast, I can't feel it for a month.This journal is highly recommended for reviewers, so be sure to be cautious when you choose a reviewer.After the minor repair, I received it the next day, and the speed was very fast.However, there are too many requirements for J.C. format requirements and other proofs, which is quite troublesome.This journal is very focused on the mechanism of exploration, and it is best to select for the full text, the chance of hitting is large.

(0) Thank | 273842193@qq.com

JC The second article, the second coresponding author article after independence, a little more than a month to repair, two questions answered on the same day, the day of employment.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

IF;5.787

(1) Thank | Anonymous

3 Submitted on the 1st of the month, the results of the first trial on the 28th, minor repair.Received three days after the minor repair.Experience: The content of the article is good.This manuscript is in place from sample preparation, experimental design, catalytic performance characterization, and mechanism analysis.It took a month for writing, and it was revised 12 times and it was finalized.Each picture has been carefully modified at least 5 times, and SI has also written 8 pages.

(7) Thank | Anonymous

1 Submitted on the 12th, and the review comments on February 11th came back.A reviewer agreed that a reviewer refused to submit the manuscript and finally edited it to the overhaul. After returning to the draft on March 1st, the editor agreed to receive the

(0) Thank | Anonymous

8月10日投In the past, the results were overhauled in 40 days, and the modification time was 4 weeks. After the revision, the editor was very satisfied and the grammar was received on October 30th.The editor is very good, very patient, very strict with the grammar requirements, changed several times, the editor finally changed the grammar personally, met a good person!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Inefficient

(0) Thank | Anonymous

After being dried by green chemistry, the journal was turned around and reviewed for 50 days. The editor of nice said that only one reviewer had comments on minor repairs.It is required to be modified for 25 days. After 20 days, it will be sent back to the deputy editor for acceptance the next day. It feels quite nice.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

selectd for 8 days and was edited directly.The response is quite detailed. If the evaluation is more plausible, it is necessary to characterize the catalytic reaction rate, not the conversion rate and the in-situ, molecular size.Recommend me to change the material category of the journal true tragedy

(0) Thank | Anonymous

My manuscript has been submitted to the journal for ten days (1.31 submission), and is still in the state of editor invited, the journal is so inefficientOh, I can't believe it!Yesterday (2.18), I saw that the status became an Under Review. I don't know if it was submitted for review.The review comments were issued on March 8, and the results were rejected.Today (July 27) uploaded another article to attack this journal, hoping to have good results!The status is transfer to the journal.On July 28, the status became with the editor.It became under review on August 19th and finally submitted for review!On September 19th, the review comments came over and rejected the draft.On October 5th, I selectd for the third

(4) Thank | Anonymous

2008 J. Cat. A total of 317 research articles were published.These articles were cited in 1862 times in 2010, with an average of 5.87 times/piece·year, and the median was cited 5 times/piece·year.These articles are ranked according to the number of citations in 2010. The top 10% (32 articles) articles have been cited 568 times, accounting for 30.5% of the total citations in 2010 and 20% (64 articles).The total number of citations in 2010 was 8.2%

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This submission was surprisingly smooth, from the first submission to the acceptance only took 35 days, if notWhen the teacher was modified, he was delayed for more than 10 days and should be accepted within 30 days.Personally, manuscripts should be written in strict accordance with the format of the article, because the journal of elesiver has to be checked, so if the format is ok, it will save a lot of time.The above editor is very good.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Last year, I needed a very systematic work, and the mechanism was thorough and novel.This year was rejected because the editor liked to use the catalytic reaction rate to express the results.It does not necessarily require a very cutting-edge field.The review was quick.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://journals.elsevier.com/00219517/journal-of-catalysis/

(0) Thank | Anonymous