My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA]Hello, you are Visitor Number 298849 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Journal Title AbbreviationsELECTROCHIM ACTA
ISSN0013-4686
h-index211
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.261.3651.081
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Electrochemistry
Q13 / 31
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemical Engineering
Q118 / 272

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)11.10%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/205/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/electacta/
Open AccessNo
PublisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyBiweekly
Year Publication Started1959
Annual Article Volume2122
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0013-4686%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.9 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 90%
Data from Elsevier: 30%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 3.4 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)
  Reviews on ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-09 13:39:00
analysis of the electrochemical aspects of lithium-ion batteries.The manuscript submitted in mid-July was in review for two days.It may be due to the reason of the holiday, more than 50 days to feedback comments, minor repairs.A total of two reviewers have raised many questions.Some of these questions are very deep and difficult to answer.Both reviewers gave the article cited in the proposal.A few days after the minor repair returned, I received a reply to the second revision.This revision is also a matter of format.Received three days after the modification was submitted.Personally, in terms of lithium-ion batteries, it is better than JPS.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-04 23:03:00
9.2 selectd, today 10. 5, no news, feeling awkward...Prayer
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-08 20:57:00
reviewed for one month, and was acceptd after minor repairs.The requirements are more rigorous and the requirements for innovation are not extremely high.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-26 15:51:00
is indeed very rigorous, and it will be reviewed quickly in a month or so.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-06 19:58:00
Received review comments after 26 days of submitment, 2 minor repairs.The reviewer was very rigorous and pointed out that the figure is unclear.The experiment was repeated, the experimental results were added, and the clear map was changed, and it was received after 2 days.I feel that this journal is very fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-05 17:19:00
40Multi-day review comments Only one reviewer three questions revised draft submitted after ten hours to receive or compare faster
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-28 12:33:00
Electrochemical field is very goodThe first-instance opinion of the journal: The first reviewer had only one opinion directly rejected, but the opinions he gave were completely different from those of my article.The second reviewer 10+ review comments suggest a major overhaul.The editor gave the rejection to re-submit.I replied to the editor for a full five pages. I repudiated the first reviewer, and the editor sent the revised manuscript only to the second reviewer.After one month, the reviewer suggested to continue to modify the submission within 2 days. After 2 months, minor repairs will be received after 1 day.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-22 09:45:00
11.5Submission, three days later under review, 1.18 returned to overhaul opinion, 2.17 submitted revised draft, more than 20 days later, 3.12 returned comments, one of the reviewers to fourThe question is not satisfied, because during the holidays, there are some experiments that make it difficult to make up.After one week, I will return to the revised draft and accept it the next day, but I will also change the language and formally accept it the next day after the revision.Personally, the key to reviewing the speed is the reviewer. It seems that the reviewer has changed the reviewer in the first trial, and only the reviewer is the right one.The editor is good, the processing is very fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-01 10:09:00
I submitted the manuscript to the end of December at the end of December, and submitted the review comments at the end of December. After the overhaul in January, I returned to the middle of February and received the official acceptance email on February 23, In press.Query
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-15 10:08:00
caught up with Christmas, and returned to the reviewer for about 40 days. Overhaul, only one reviewer, about 20 days in the middle of the data, revised draft, revise received 4 days after uploading,At the 28th of the year, I received the acceptance notice. The first submitment was satisfactory. The reviewer was very serious and benefited a lot.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-14 12:23:00
Electrochemical is a very professional journal, the article quality is good..The editor is responsible and the reviewer is also very good and rigorous.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-11 13:53:00
was originally major revision, and later was rejcet, then tried and edited the communication and re-submited, and later edited the letter I am pleased to inform you that the revised version of your paper** has been accepted forPublication in Electrochimica Acta without further modifications. This article has finally been tossed by Received 23 December 2011. Rev
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-11 21:00:00
9.2 contribution, three days with editor 9.26 review comments returned, a major repair, a rejectionThe editor temporarily refused to submit the manuscript. If he changed it, he could re-submitted 10.12 and re-submit in it. After one month, the reviewer returned. The reviewer who refused the manuscript directly suggested this issue, and the other reviewer gave 25 amendments.After the modification, the select will be returned. After ten days, the review comments will be returned. The article will be improved. At the same time, four comments will be given. After the modification, the return will be made. After the editor-in-chief, the reply will be received on the same day. The image format needs to be changed.receive.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-21 18:40:00
9 Submitted at the end of the month, waited for nearly one and a half months before the news (the previous one was a month to return comments), wrote a reminder letter, edited the letter the next day, saying that there is a reviewWhen the manuscript did not return to the opinion, he only sent another one, and raised nine questions. He felt unprofessional. He might not have chosen the reviewer and did not ask the key.I returned to the comments one week, I thought I had to wait for the opinions of another reviewer, or to change the reviewer, plus Christmas, hehe.Unexpectedly, review received a week, the editor really gave face, it seems that the festival is over, and the mood is good..Good journals, the efficiency is still relatively high, the editors are more kind, maybe it is my luck..
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-15 15:07:00
This journal belongs to the top journal in the field of electrochemistry, and the overall feeling is not bad.My work is also happy to select for this journal.However, it has recently been discovered that editors sometimes do not know whether they are confused or lazy. Two of the professors in our institute have been handed over to another professor in the institute for review.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-15 13:50:00
I liked the journal. I selectd twice for the day and then returned the review results in about 28 days.After the revision of the reviewer's opinion, I feel that the article has indeed improved a lot, hehe.However, the other people in the lab submitted the manuscript and returned to the opinion in 42 days.Overall, very good journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-13 15:41:00
is a very good journal, the submission period is generally 3 months, my review date is very fast, more than 20 days, seriously revised, replyAfter receiving the reviewer's comments, I will receive it for about 3 months. I feel that the editor is very responsible and very dedicated. I am very grateful to the editors and reviewers!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-23 09:20:00
I submitted the manuscript on October 10 this year. After under review for one month, 11.16 received a notice: MINOR (INCLUDING LANGUAGE) REVISIONS, revised for a week, yesterday selectd back, today closedTo the notice - accept.The review of this journal is indeed very fast, and the editor Sotiris Sotiropoulos is very dedicated and very good.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-10 22:44:00
I published 2 articles in the journal.Although the influence factor of Electrochemistry communications is higher, I personally prefer this journal (the EC also issued one), because this can publish the full text, the content is more informative, compared to EC is a communication, a lot of valuable data are due toIt is a pity to give up the length of the question.In the past few years, the impact factor of this journal has also risen sharply, and it has been rated as the engineering area 1 or the owner.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-08 19:36:00
I just dropped an article today, doing the modification of the electrode, including the characterization and analysis of materials and electrochemistry, looking forward to it!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-20 22:45:00
This journal is in Zone I or Zone II in the JCR partition; the original I have seen is Zone I, but I saw a version last year, showing that it is in Zone II.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-20 22:20:00
A journal that feels good, the reviewers' opinions are also more professional, but as long as your article is reasonably rigorous, the general problem is not big.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-12 00:34:00
has received a few articles, the speed is still very good, the editor is very neutral.However, I feel that some domestic reviewers love to find faults, but it is very disgusting!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-24 08:44:00
Journal of Electrochemical Direction, it is still good, selectd at the end of June, with editor within three days, the first review opinion is mid-July, still relatively fast, repaired and submitted 8On the 6th of the month, the opinion returned again, and after being modified again, it was received and received the same night.It’s less than two months, and the speed is OK.The reviewer is very responsible and is a good journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-21 16:55:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)

Start your review of [ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy