My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA]Hello, you are Visitor Number 298781 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Journal Title AbbreviationsELECTROCHIM ACTA
ISSN0013-4686
h-index211
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.261.3651.081
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Electrochemistry
Q13 / 31
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemical Engineering
Q118 / 272

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)11.10%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/205/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/electacta/
Open AccessNo
PublisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyBiweekly
Year Publication Started1959
Annual Article Volume2122
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0013-4686%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.9 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 90%
Data from Elsevier: 30%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 3.4 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)
  Reviews on ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-16 13:01:00
4月2日 under review One until now!No news yet, how to see everyone's speed is very fast!Hey!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-14 17:14:00
An article written last year, too busy, has not had time to select.At the end of February this year, the manuscript returned in early March (about 30 days), minor, two reviewers, the first one, the second one, but all were dispensable.I gave a modification time of one month, and returned to May Day and received it immediately.Personal feeling, better.Nanomaterials, combined with electrochemical analysis, have certain innovations, writing and writing, logical and reasonable, and analysis is in place, basically no problem
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-11 07:39:00
Reviewing is relatively fast...The quality of the article is good and difficult, but as long as you have the opportunity to change and answer each question seriously, you will feel basically no problem.I feel that the editor of this journal attaches great importance to the author's attitude towards reviewing comments.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-08 11:27:00
Reviewing is faster!Submitted on March 26, submitted for review on March 27, under review status, the status date changed on April 21, but the status is still under review, do not know what it means?The review was completed on May 3, and the temporary rejection was rejected on May 4! Two reviewers, one was very low, and the other was very positive, similar to minor repairs, and the editor refused it!However, the editor said that this is a temporary refusal. If you are interested, you can select again, but you need to reply to the comments of the two editors, especially the positive comments?I don't know what this means to edit. If there is hope for a re-entry?People who have had similar experience come out and say thank you!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-15 11:06:00
2The draft of the 3rd select, there is no review opinion...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-09 14:52:00
3The 8th select, the 17th state is onlyWith editor became under review, April 9 became Required Reviews Completed.I hope that there will be good results~~~~~~ April 19th, it has been this state....More than six months after the revision in May, I finally received it.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-07 21:36:00
4Submission No. 4, with editor, selected Japanese editor, do not know how to pray
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-29 09:17:00
submitted the number the next day, the statusBecome an under review, don't know if it is a good thing or a bad thing?In short, in prayer....If received, the gold coins are 200....
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-20 08:52:00
1 monthly submission, receive review comments in February, change back 3 days to go, and directly accept one day.It was very fast, and it took only one month from submission to acceptance.This is my second article in EA.The first reviewer asked me to make a good revision.The second reviewer was the editor himself. He did not make any comments. He only made changes according to the opinions of my first reviewer, but he added that if the amendment is not good enough, he will find another reviewer to review it again.draft.So you can make a good change.In fact, the journal does not need to be very innovative, but it requires rigor.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-14 13:08:00
The work of organic electrochromism itself did not seem to be much new at first glance. When it was written, the OE, which started to select at another point, refused directly after the journal was selectd nearly a month later.The reviewer's comments came back. One reviewer has no comments. Another comment is more than a dozen comments. It is very serious. The main reason is that the format problem is revised two days after the submission of the notice.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-10 18:12:00
Very fast journal!In the 13th year of January 13th, the select was given on February 9th. There are 5 questions in total, and one is to quote a document. In addition, a SEM is needed. Because it is a winter vacation, there is no way to measure it.SEM, after finishing the year to return to the school to complete the data, uploaded on March 9th, thought it was Saturday, it will take a few days to have results, I did not expect the editor to be very dedicated, received on March 10!As a student of the second study, I am very happy to select for such a journal!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-04 19:35:00
Very fast journal.Initial Date Submitted-------Jan 27, 2013 Two days later Under ReviewFeb. 6, 2013, review comments returned to the first reviewer suggested to be revised, but to supplement the XPS experiment; second reviewPeople suggest minor repairs and use the words "Well written, scientifically sound paper".The editor's suggestion is revised according to the reviewer's comments and published.Because it was only two days after the Chinese New Year, the school could not do the experiment, so I waited
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-01 10:25:00
Received at Editorial Office: Mid-11, 2012 Article revised: At the end of January 2013, Article accepted for publication: 2013Expected dispatch of proofs in early February: mid-February 2013
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-26 15:47:00
The speed is really fast. It takes only 2 weeks from under review to reject. It returns the opinions of 3 reviewers. One of them feels that there are many things to change, the second one givesSome minor mistakes, and raised the same problem as the first one, the third said that it does not meet the journal style and standards, and then the editor refused, oh, sad reminder
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-24 21:15:00
submitted two days laterRefused, looking for the editor-in-chief Sergio Trasatti, said that it is more appropriate to select for other journals, it is recommended to select for journals such as corrosion science.The strange thing is that I have seen similar articles received before. I don't know if it is an editor's appetite?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-08 09:52:00
My revised manuscript Nov 29, 2012under review, no news yet, anxious...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-06 18:59:00
has 3 EAs, the first 2 are submitted for the day, 30 days for comments, the third is for 3 months, all overhaul, each time has 10 comments.I am doing partial electrochemistry, and the review comments are professionally sharp.However, as long as you answer it well, even if some questions can't be answered or the test can't be added, the attitude is up and you can finally accept it.The influence can be, and the end of the 11th year has now been quoted 10 times, and it is still satisfactory.Compared with JPS, EA pays more attention to electrochemical characterization and reaction kinetics.If the structure of the synthesis is novel, the performance can be submited in JPS or JMC, perhaps in the middle.The research team has students who selectd for EA on the nanoscale and JMC because of the lack of work in the electrochemical part.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-25 20:45:00
At the beginning of October, it’s been two and a half months now, and it’s still in the review, there is no progress.Christmas, it is estimated that it will drag on for a long time, I hope to have good news soon!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-24 21:15:00
The day of the select was under review, but the review draft dragged on for nearly four months, which is a relatively rare phenomenon. The result is only one reviewer's opinion, published after minor repairs.There is no EC for reviewing the manuscript, and the requirements for manuscripts are not as high as EC, and the requirements for English are higher.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-08 11:10:00
3 Reviewers, returning review comments for about one month, overhaul, returning after about 1 month, minor repair language reception.The overall feeling is quite professional, and the requirements for the article are not low.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-05 21:28:00
10 The first draft of the first submitment in the past, more than two months, or under review, slow, I hope that I am lucky.I have a message in the lab for a month of summer vacation. I am so slow to bless myself.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-31 17:34:00
Objectively speaking, the editors and reviewers of EA are very professional. The two reviewers have submitted 13 and 11 review comments and some opinions.It's quite meaningful, but it's still very positive for my paper. Less than a month's message. The reviewers asked for overhaul and minor repairs. The requirements are more rigorous. The data is more than enough.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-25 09:03:00
More than 2 months or under review, efficiency can not be high
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-23 00:56:00
7 late in the month, review comments in late October: revised.In the middle, I changed the reviewer twice.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-19 15:59:00
has a relatively high electrochemical requirement, and was rejected after two weeks of submission with the editor!In the heart of
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)

Start your review of [ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy