My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA]Hello, you are Visitor Number 298848 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Journal Title AbbreviationsELECTROCHIM ACTA
ISSN0013-4686
h-index211
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.261.3651.081
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Electrochemistry
Q13 / 31
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemical Engineering
Q118 / 272

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)11.10%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/205/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/electacta/
Open AccessNo
PublisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyBiweekly
Year Publication Started1959
Annual Article Volume2122
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0013-4686%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.9 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 90%
Data from Elsevier: 30%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 3.4 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)
  Reviews on ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-25 15:48:00
This is down to Zone 3?The speed is a bit too fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-18 20:20:00
10.2Submitted, 10.5 under review, 10.30 received review comments, only one person, but submitted 22 amendments, very careful professional, revised ten days, 11.10 submissionRevised draft, 11.14under review, 11.16accept.From submission to recruitment for one and a half months, the efficiency is very fast, and the reviewers are also very professional.The editor is Sotiris Sotiropoulos.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-16 21:43:00
just submitted, debut, pray ing, hope to be in!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-04 16:29:00
In the latest 2013 partition, although it is still in the big category, it is also the second-to-last, and may fall afterwards, so you should pay attention to the requirements of the partition.Purely friendly reminder...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-21 22:36:00
This article is really bumpy, the initial submitment is carbon, did not send the review in the editor gogosti that refused, no new ideas.Then transferred to the Journal of Power Sources, the overhaul of the 4 months of the devil's editor, the 21 reviewers 21 questions, one month's revision time, is catching up with the New Year, the results were carefully revised and the second trial refused, saying my modificationThere are still loopholes.After that, the revised version of the article will be transferred to JMCA, and it will be rejected in two months. It is said that the new ideas are not enough, and the two reviewers have submitted less than 10 comments.Finally, after synthesizing all the review comments, the final revised version was submitted to EA, the editor was Ruediger Koetz, and the result was reviewed for another 4 months. I was told that one reviewer reviewed the manuscript
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-21 16:23:00
September 13 submitted out, unknown situation.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-05 16:17:00
6.20No.7.25 Return to reviewer comments 8.22 Overhaul returns 9.23 Suddenly under review date changed 9.29 No. returned a few grammatical errors, it is minor repair 9.30 Minor repair return 10.1 Receive.What I did was the direction of the supercapacitor electrode material. The highlights of the article were not very prominent, but the data was very good. There were 6 problems in the overhaul. It took nearly a month to complete the answer. There were 11 faces and answered the reviewer seriously.The title seems to be critical, I really can't answer it, and the attitude is very clear.In general, it is very professional soon.It lasted for 3 months, but I think the article is based on
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-27 23:42:00
. It is about the lithium battery positive composite material. It discusses the impact on performance. Before submiting in JPS, it was rejected after the overhaul. One of the millionUnlucky, later changed to EA, the editor is Shigang Sun of Xiamen University, very nice, after the minor review, gave two reviewers comments, all suggested to modify after accept, spent a few days to modify, deleted some useless dataMainly still citation rebuttal, directly accepted after uploading, one of the reviewers said that although it was not completely modified according to his opinion, it is still much better than the previous article, and it is recommended to accept.The following is the time schedule: Received 5 June 2012 Received in revised form 8 July 2012 Acc
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-21 22:24:00
review for one and a half months, 8.8-9.20, review date has been changing, it seems not very good to findThe manuscript, although the three men reviewed the manuscript, only returned the comments of one reviewer and raised two questions, which were acceptd on the day after the minor repair.The journal feels that the innovation requirements are not extremely high. I am doing electrochemical methods to prepare semiconductor materials, measuring gas sensing performance, writing the general quality of the article, and the second EA during the master's degree.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-28 10:35:00
After one month of posting, the article was rejected, and the reviewer’s comments were more professional, and the editor asked for rewriting.Seriously complete the data, and then select again after the revision. After one month, I received the review comments, minor repairs, and accepted the next day after the repair.Feel the speed of journal review
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-09 17:57:00
has published two articles and reviewed two articles for this journal.The editors stipulated that the comments were returned within 21 days. One of the manuscripts was reviewed for two days. He directly refused and gave more than a dozen amendments. About 1,000 words, the editor’s last opinion refused; the other review took 3 days., gave three revisions to the overhaul, and the editor gave it a rejection.At the beginning of this month, I took over a manuscript sent by the editor. I read it aloud. It was written by a teacher at a key university in a province in China. I haven’t had time to look at it carefully. I plan to give an opinion before the 20th of this month.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-09 13:18:00
Two weeks to review the comments of Xiao Xiu, one week to return to the revised draft, there are two tests can not make up, do not know if you can, I wish you good luck!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-08 11:33:00
Very good electrochemical professional journals, the journal requires comprehensive and detailed analysis of electrochemical performance, and it is best to combine with current popular materials.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-06 22:26:00
Ruediger Koetz The editors of the three reviewers refused, the cups were... one month, the speed is ok!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-06 05:58:00
2013.6.19Submission 2013.6.20underreview2013.7.20 revise2013.8.4Revised 2013.8.5accept
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-02 14:35:00
20130601 Submitted to Journal20130603 With Editor20130709 RevisionThree Reviewers (27 Comments)We have to2030728 Submit Revision to Journal20130802 Accepted
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-27 18:34:00
A major repair, a minor repair, a rejection, the editor has refused, really depressed!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-21 15:41:00
Personal feeling is still relatively fast, 2 months when the review comments, to return within 1 month, on the 17th evening to repair the revised draft, on the morning of the 18th saw the editor's letter accepted.The editor is SS.Very efficient and friendly.I may be lucky to meet only two reviewers, one to receive and one to ask a few questions.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-21 12:16:00
Why do I see an article in this journal that quotes Chinese Chinese journals, of course, the author of the article is Chinese.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-27 15:37:00
This journal has so far selectd for 3 articles and accepted them.All are SS as editors. In general, this journal is very professional and the speed is relatively fast.Our research direction is semiconductor electrochemistry, which mainly involves charge transfer and transfer behavior.The overall feeling, this journal prefers basic research in electrochemistry.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-19 08:25:00
The manuscript that I selectd on April 20 this year, the editor is Sotiris Sotiropoulos, the review period is 1 month and 25 days (the middle under review time has been changing), after the draft is JuneOn the 15th, I came back to the opinions of the two reviewers. (The three reviewers, one of the editors said that he did not reply.) may be related to the material gas sensitivity test I made, and the reviewers’ opinions clearly showed the righteousness.Sensitive performance is unfamiliar, so it is very good to write a reply, after a day to return to the manuscript, edited and received two days later, it is worth to select again later, sincerely said that it is still very fast
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-04 08:40:00
just submitted an article (6.1), is the combination of anti-corrosion and nano-materials, is currently Submitted to Journal, selected Japanese editors, do not know what the results?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-31 10:02:00
EA just accepted, submitted from March 11th to May 29th, lasted more than two months, finally Accept. Saco 200.PS. This is the second EA. So far, 5 SCIs have been published, including two in one district and three in two districts.I am a Ph.D., I have seen two masters who also sent two EAs. It is very 惭愧
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-21 15:42:00
This is the first article in the master's degree, and the reviewer's review time is quite long.I submitted the manuscript before New Year's Day. On April 2nd, I reminded me of the comments of the two reviewers, mainly the revision.Just in time to catch up with the holiday, I changed the holiday on April 8th and changed the select. On May 14th, I received another revision. I mainly revised some words and punctuation marks of the article, and received it on May 20th.letter.Although the article review is a bit tangled, but this is the first article during the master's degree, I am still very happy.Personally feel that the journal's innovative requirements are not very high, but the reviewers are very rigorous, and the writing requirements are also very high, so the manuscripts that have been written are carefully scrutinized and re-submited.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-16 13:03:00
Quick hair, I went under review on March 11th, and it has been this state until now.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)

Start your review of [ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy