My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA]Hello, you are Visitor Number 298846 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Journal Title AbbreviationsELECTROCHIM ACTA
ISSN0013-4686
h-index211
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.261.3651.081
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Electrochemistry
Q13 / 31
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemical Engineering
Q118 / 272

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)11.10%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/205/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/electacta/
Open AccessNo
PublisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyBiweekly
Year Publication Started1959
Annual Article Volume2122
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0013-4686%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.9 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 90%
Data from Elsevier: 30%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 3.4 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)
  Reviews on ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA: Write a review
Author: 746666512@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-06 10:15:27
Received at Editorial Office22 Dec 2017Article revised2 Mar 2018Article accepted for publication6 Mar 2018It was repaired twice, and it was edited to the editor three days after the second revision, and then edited as accepted the next day.The efficiency is still very fast.Thank you, editor Huang.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 746666512@qq.com

Author: 746666512@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-06 10:14:52
Received at Editorial Office22 Dec 2017Article revised2 Mar 2018Article accepted for publication6 Mar 2018It was repaired twice, and it was edited to the editor three days after the second revision, and then edited as accepted the next day.The efficiency is still very fast.Thank you, editor Huang.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 746666512@qq.com

Author: Kelong Ao


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-01 19:16:16
September 1 contributionThe results of the review will be notified on October 2, and the overhaul will be repeated.Revised back on November 12December 12th notice review results, minor repairRevised on January 9 and received on January 12Visible online on January 13!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Kelong Ao

Author: 251651974@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-04 20:46:39
Edit is very responsible, although for 3 months, the editor is more concerned about the reviewer's opinion.Minor repair, after the revision, the reviewer is not satisfied with one. Continue to minor repair and then accept, as for the opinion on the 128th floor is more funny, daltons is better than this impurity?It's a bit lopsided. This impurity is good in electrochemical terms, except for impurities above 10, this grade of partial electrochemical EC EA, partial electrochemical calculation of JES, partial performance, energy system JPS.They are all impurities of widespread concern.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 251651974@qq.com

Author: 0842


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-02 10:42:41
Very general journal, worse than Daltons
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 0842

Author: ajjj


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-02 10:41:27
want to drop the zone, 2018 definitely 2 zone
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ajjj

Author: 西西


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-03 16:22:06
4In the month of the select, I received the feedback in July. After the overhaul, I selectd out in August. After waiting for 4 months, the reminder was accepted the next day.It turns out that these journals are all reminded that you are not in a hurry...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 西西

Author: 869718417@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-30 19:49:22
submitted out for more than 3 months, still no news, wait for the flowersThank you, but I dare not try the
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 869718417@qq.com

Author: wwmwwm


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-04 16:21:47
The third reviewer, not too polite, approved our language, but also approved our lack of new science. Let us change the language and let him review.We said that a lot of new science has been added to the revised draft.In my heart, in the future, when a material or physical publication rejects (or is rejected), it can be said (or said) no new physics.8.28. resubmitted9.20 revise, 14 questionsFirst reviewer, very satisfied.The second reviewer also expressed satisfactory expression, but gave 14 comments, but did not let us make up the experiment.Also let delete 1/5 data, transfer some supporting materials to the body.We delete the drawings and delete the text.The editor gave a 30-day deadline.10.1, second reivision submitted to J.10.4. accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | wwmwwm

Author: wwmwwm


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-04 16:21:22
5.1. submitted to j.5.1. with editor, Nick professor in Monash,5.1. under review5.25. under review7.19. revised, 3 referees, 38 questions and commentsThe second reviewer gave 38 amendments and asked to re-do the scanning experiment. The original scan was 8 times, and now it is necessary to sweep 100 times.We found that the law is still the same, and we have a bottom in our hearts.It is also required to deoxidize the solution, and specifically purchased a nitrogen bottle for deoxidation.Then check the data to calculate the reaction parameters.The 30-day revision period is not enough to apply for an extension.The editor-in-chief said that it can be changed at any time.In this way, almost one summer vacation has gone in.This is not, reponse wrote 36 pages (double line spacing), using 48 references.There are two experiments, we can't make up, we can only tell the truth in the reply, saying that we have to graduate, we can't make up.The first reviewer, the Japanese Bulls Group, added several references.We are very cooperative with a few references, the nature series, the good cow article.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | wwmwwm

Author: 545322334@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-21 12:55:32
Lithium battery negative material, 2017.1.18 contribution, received review comments on February 13th, overhaul, 4 reviewers have good questions, after answering the revised, February 24Re-submitment, directly received on March 20.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 545322334@qq.com

Author: 2278360352@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-08 17:36:45
8.1 No submission, 8.27 is submitted for review, there is a month for editing, now I am going to modify the opinion, I am afraid that I will refuse to submit the manuscript, all kinds of worry, the first SCI in life,Waiting....
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 2278360352@qq.com

Author: 啊啊啊


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-28 17:30:54
The first submission, the review comments for dozens of days, revised in the past month;Submit the revised draft and submit the review comments for three months. The reason is that one of the reviewers rejected the draft, and the editor gave the amendment and revised it for one week;Submit the revised draft and receive it in two days.About 5 months before and after
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 啊啊啊

Author: qiuliang1992@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-27 10:45:17
5 25 shots, June 20 received overhaul, three reviewers question 15 11 3, looked at some crashes, thanks to the editor did not directly refuse, did not give up, seriously revised, July19 returned to overhaul, received the first reviewer's minor repair 4 questions on August 9th, continued to change, August 20 returned to minor repair, August 21 finally finally received, the first SCI, the process is difficult, the result is stillSatisfied
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | qiuliang1992@163.com

Author: phoebe


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-27 09:17:36
JuneSubmission, one month back, three reviewers, sixteen comments.One by one, the amendments, including the supplementary experiments, are close to one month.Return to the revised draft.On the third day, the editor's reply needs to be modified in English.The paper was taken back in English for a week, submitted again, and received one day later.The overall processing speed is fast.The journal is good, the old journal.The editor has a vision.what.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | phoebe

Author: 1245


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-25 18:17:47
This journal is worthy, a little innovative, accepted, and RSC Advance a level, junk journal
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 1245

Author: IMissJoey


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-07 08:51:56
2017.01 The manuscript submitted has not been returned for 5 months, and the manuscript has been submitted.Return after 2 weeks and accept it directly on the day.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | IMissJoey

Author: tctang@ciac.ac.cn


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-26 22:16:28
5 Submitted on the 23rd of the month, under review on June 3rd, and the first review on June 16th, 2 reviewers.Returned to the revised draft on June 23 and received on June 26.
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | tctang@ciac.ac.cn

Author: zth


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-13 21:10:14
first-instance opinion is very sharp, change it, but accept it.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | zth

Author: zhangyuzhu


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-22 08:20:32
has been submitted for 10 days or with editor, how is it?
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | zhangyuzhu

Author: 1551712448@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-27 20:06:06
After being rejected by Energy Fuels, he revised the chemical engineering journal. After submitting the manuscript for one month, he received an editorial reply, and the two reviewers had a major overhaul.A minor repair.The opinion is very mild.Then I changed it very carefully according to the reviewer's comments.Edit direct reception in less than 3 days.The first SCI was so successful.The editor is very nice.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 1551712448@qq.com

Author: 123


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-25 14:49:55
The second trial is ten days, and there is no news at all. The second trial time of EA is uncertain...
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 123

Author: jiangminhh@126.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-24 12:43:16
The first article, going out in mid-April, the comments back in early June, a minor repair, a one-off, one month, back on July 19, September 1Accepted, it is also smooth, the cycle is relatively long, the editor is very nice one
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | jiangminhh@126.com

Author: hongjunchen279@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-10 10:48:31
6 On the 21st, selectd out, on July 18th, the message was revise, on July 28th, it was returned to the revised draft, and on August 8th, it received directly and received the proof link.The rate of EA has been good. It is usually news within a month. It is about to accept a game in the middle of the night. The editor is the editor of Sotiris Sotiropoulos in Greece. It is friendly.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | hongjunchen279@163.com

Author: hongjunchen279@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-10 10:48:24
6 On the 21st, selectd out, on July 18th, the message was revise, on July 28th, it was returned to the revised draft, and on August 8th, it received directly and received the proof link.The rate of EA has been good. It is usually news within a month. It is about to accept a game in the middle of the night. The editor is the editor of Sotiris Sotiropoulos in Greece. It is friendly.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | hongjunchen279@163.com

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)

Start your review of [ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy