X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

DESALINATION

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[DESALINATION]Hello, you are Visitor Number 83652 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleDESALINATION
Journal Title AbbreviationsDESALINATION
ISSN0011-9164
h-index155
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
12.401.8141.958
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Mechanical Engineering
Q115 / 585
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemical Engineering
Q111 / 281
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: General Materials Science
Q127 / 460
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemistry
Q128 / 398
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Water Science and Technology
Q13 / 217

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)14.70%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/502683/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/DES
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1966
Annual Article Volume290
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0011-9164%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.4 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 4.4 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 84%
Data from Elsevier: 27%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 7.5 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【DESALINATION】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on DESALINATION: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-18 19:06:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-12 21:28:00
desalination journal is really high, 30I gave a small repair opinion in the day, passed it in the past one day, and topped the journal!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-11 13:00:00
The editor is very serious and responsible. The revision comments are very helpful for the improvement of the level of the article. It is not as easy as imagined, and it is modified twice to receive.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-20 21:55:00
Submitted in December last year, returned after three months, four reviewers, gave two people's opinions, thought it was good, but also proposed a total of more than a dozen questions, anotherIt is considered unsuitable for the publication of the journal (although it is indeed an article of Zhanbian, which is also worried about wastewater treatment). The editor gave a minor repair, and was repaired five days later, and received two days later.Thankfully, my first SCI, Bo San, is the most encouraging morale in the face of delays.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-06 11:44:00
was refused by separation and purification. In early November, the opinion given in January of the following year was said to be overhauled. There was only one reviewer, and the opinions were all in the tone of consultation. The attitude was particularly modest.It is recommended to overhaul, because the Chinese New Year dragged it for a month before uploading the revised manuscript, accepted within 3 months, the article impact factor 1.851, my article is very simple, the analysis means no new idea, that is, the membrane pollution I directed againstAfter that, I sent
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-27 22:23:00
An article about synthetic brine adsorbent, selectd for the past 20 days, moderate, three reviewers, one reviewer directly rejectedThere is no specific opinion, that is to say no, the second person has no opinion. The third person has seven opinions in detail. The question is very detailed. I answered it seriously and learned a lot of knowledge points that I had not paid attention to before.Returning one month, no experiment, received after eight days.It may be that luck is good, it is faster, it is handled by the editor.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-01 23:17:00
The speed is very fast, but the luck is not good, just a reviewer, did not give any substantive amendments, it is said that the work done is of little significance, the editor will refuse.The efficiency is still quite fast, and no impact on efficiency before Christmas.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-28 21:23:00
is still OK, very fast, 2 months after the July select to overhaul, mainly because I have to find a job, I have been dragging for 2 months, more than November to repair, noIt was collected in one month, and the editing efficiency was quite high.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-13 10:21:00
Invested one in mid-June, returned to the opinion after 2 months, two overhauls and one minor repair, and the editor finally gave the overhaul.A lot of comments were made, mainly no one is guiding --!Sharply confused, I selectd for it.The reviewers really didn't say that Gray was always careful, and one of the reviewers gave me a lot of details on the PDF. ^^~~ I am grateful to you, so I saved a lot of trouble.Returning after one month, minor repairs after two weeks, a small problem, received directly the next day.I feel that this journal is still relatively easy, the editor is also good, very responsible.Although the journal is general, the graduation worry has gone for me.The review cycle is not as terrifying as the legend, and I hope to help everyone.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-01 09:32:00
has been reviewed in the past 4 days, and I am looking forward to having a good result
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-23 09:29:00
is not as easy as I thought. I selectd for 1 at the end of March, after a long time.After reviewing the manuscript, he gave a major repair in mid-July. After that, he returned for almost 2 months. After returning, he submitted it to the reviewer for review. After 10 days, he received the editor’s rejection letter, mainly because the reviewer felt that the revised article still reachedNot at the level of publication... Hey, tragedy, can only accept the fate... I don’t know what journal to select for again...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-14 15:44:00
Review, accept speed is OK, before and afterIt will be 3 months, but there seems to be no free sample, I have to buy it myself.I don't know if anyone else has a sample publication.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-27 09:15:00
The editor of this journal is very serious. There are not a few comments on the first-instance opinion. After the change, I selectd again and found that he sent the response to the reviewer again. The time is 8 weeks.........Wait a minute.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-19 10:00:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-07-11 16:35:00
1Invested in the first month, FebruaryThe advice given in the middle, Xiao Xiu, accepted after two days of throwing out, there is already a page number
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-11 14:34:00
OK, very fast
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-04-11 20:01:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-04-07 20:43:00
No one else said so horrible, throwing at the end of JanuaryOn April 7th, I returned to the opinion, Xiao Xiu, three reviewers, and the editor was still very responsible. The review comments were returned to the same day and the Xiaoxiu comments were given.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 环境工程
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-03-04 09:24:00
Last year's select at the end of October, to major revison in December, returning in mid-January, and receiving the draft in late.Of course, I may have encountered a good editor, and I have heard that there is no news for three months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 环境
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-12-28 20:50:00
selectd once, and there was news in three months. After less than one month of posting, it was received less than one week later, much faster than the legendary
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 膜分离
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-12-20 10:17:00
An article about the preparation and separation of molecular sieve membranes was submitted a month ago. The length is longer and the data is relatively more. The reviewers are very quick.After the trial, the editing efficiency is also very high. One of the reviewers said that there is basically no need to modify it. The other one mentions some small problems in the format. Generally speaking, there are not many problems. It is relatively easy to modify, so I personally think that desalination should still beThe kind that is easier to receive, haha...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 脱盐
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-12-06 15:36:00
I selectd at the time of reading, I have been auditing for more than a year, and I have been working for 2 years.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 水处理
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-10-06 15:40:00
This journal editor is very fast.And the impact factor continues to rise.After the recommended article has been rejected by an environmental journal such as jhm, it can be submitted here.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-09-28 10:50:00
The first article was received within three months. The second review has not been submitted for review for three months. The key is to see which editor has handled it. It is also a matter of luck!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-08-19 23:05:00
selectd once, from submission to Online for 7 months, the review was used for nearly 3 months, then it was repaired and used for another half a month.Okay.In the past 10 years, I selectd again. It has been four months since I was still reviewing the manuscript, and I have changed the time for reviewing the paper three times. It is true...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [DESALINATION]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service