CATALYSIS TODAY

This journal is highly-regarded in this discipline. My manuscript went through the submission process for about 8 months – which is long – but it was probably because I had to complete some serious revisions as a result of the reviewers’ comments. However, the reviewers’ comments were extremely relevant, and significantly improved the quality of my article. Regardless, this may not be the best journal if you’re trying to publish quickly. Some folks I know withdrew their manuscript after receiving revisions from the reviewers. If you decide to move forward with completing the revisions, I think the acceptance rate is pretty high upon re-submission.

(14) Thank | Anonymous

2017 .8.23 Conference Draft2017.10.1 Submission2018.3.10 Overhaul2018.4.15 Receive

(0) Thank | 1063655498@qq.com

2017 .8.23 Conference draft2017.10.1 Submission2018.3.10 Overhaul2018.4.15 Receive

(0) Thank | 1063655498@qq.com

Conference draft, 2017.12.30 contribution, 2018.2.3 review comments overhaul, 2018.2.14 return revised draft, 2018.3.28 received.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2017.10.1 select2017.12.1 comments back, overhaul.The problem is quite professional, not like letting you add a random data.2017.12.25 reply comments.2018.1.3 Receiving.The speed is a total of three months, and the review is two months.I hope my opinion can give you a reference.

(0) Thank | 1

article basic situation 2017-9-23 contribution; 10-28 return comments, overhaul; 11-11 return revised draft; 11-18 status changed to with editor; 11-26 accepted.The first SCI for graduate students is still quite smooth.The level of reviewers is very high, and the recommendations are very valuable. After the revisions are made, the level of the articles has been greatly improved.Thanks to reviewers and editors!

(0) Thank | Yuxisheng

Personally think that the journal is still a very professional journal, the reviewers are experts in the industry, so the review processVery detailed and strict, this is very helpful to the quality control of the article, which may be the root cause of the steady improvement of the journal's impact factor year by year.

(0) Thank | hanwei.ripp@sinopec.com

Personally think that the journal is still a very professional journal, and the reviewers are experts in the industry, so the review process is very detailed and strict, which is very helpful to the quality control of the article.Improve, this may also be the root cause of the journal's impact on its steady improvement year by year.

(0) Thank | hanwei.ripp@sinopec.com

After the meeting, the organizer recommended it and submitted it to online publishing for a total of three months. It is expected to be officially published for one year.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

11月15Submission January 28 overhaul February 15th revised draft March 15th opinion back Minor March 24th completed and returned to select on April 1st

(2) Thank | 小丁

conference draft, submitted on June 28, and now with the editor state on August 10th.

(0) Thank | 海伦

foreigner is still a relatively recognized publication, does not accept free submissions, only accepts drafts of international conferences, generally publishes a special issue on the theme of the conference.Submissions and reviewers are similar to other publications, but a manuscript introduction letter is required at the time of submission (the organizer will send it when attending the meeting).It is sometimes slow to receive official publications (because all the articles in this issue are processed before they can be published).

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Only to attend the meeting to submit the manuscript, and the post-submission review processIt is the same as other SCI journals.In September last year, the tutor was invited to participate in the relevant meeting, submitted on December 1st, and once overhauled in the middle, and received it on March 1.The speed is still very fast.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

I have information about this issue but I don't know how to edit it. How do I upload screenshots in this version?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

seems to only accept the draft, but fortunately, both are submitted.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

was the draft after the meeting, and the peer review last time to find 3 judges twice to accept.The review speed can also be an article in

(0) Thank | Anonymous

.Conference paper submissions may not always be in the middle.The paper manuscript was issued for a year.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

About the draft, the review is very fast, but it is more difficult, in September, the select was just rejected in November

(0) Thank | Anonymous

It seems that the

(0) Thank | Anonymous

of the draft is very fast, but it is very difficult.Generally, only conference papers are accepted, and conference papers are accepted only by peer review.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The reason why the hit rate is very difficult is that the journal only accepts drafts and does not accept free submissions.

(0) Thank | Anonymous