Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENTNEW webinar covering conference tips and strategies – Register now.

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT]Hello, you are Visitor Number 35266 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleWATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
Journal Title AbbreviationsWATER RESOUR MANAG
ISSN0920-4741
E-ISSN1573-1650
h-index82
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
3.301.0971.486
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Water Science and Technology
Q125 / 203
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Civil and Structural Engineering
Q137 / 288

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)11.60%
Official Websitehttp://www.springer.com/earth+sciences+and+geography/hydrogeology/journal/11269
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/warm/default.aspx
Open AccessNo
PublisherSPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS, 3311 GZ
Subject Area环境科学
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencyBimonthly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume299
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0920-4741%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 12.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-16 12:18:00
Submitted on September 7; after about a week the status showed editor assigned; by September 25 it showed under review, but later the status data became October 5 even though the status was still under review. I hope this means I will be given the opportunity to revise the paper. Update: received review comments on November 23, major revision, but the comments from the two reviewers are not harsh so should be easy to answer. Update again: submitted a revised manuscript on December 26, and then the status showed editor assigned the next day. I received the email of acceptance for publication on January 2.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: aiguozhe2


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-18 03:33:11
Paper was sent to two reviewers for review. One is very positive, and the other did not review the paper. The editor finally just decided to reject the paper for no clear reasons.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | aiguozhe2

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-03 16:45:44
3 Submitted at the end of the month, received review comments at the beginning of June, two reviewers, overhauled, repaired back at the end of July, received the second review comments at the end of August, minor repairs, repaired back,Accepted in early October, online after a few days, is expected to see the journal in January and February next year.Need to be reminded that this journal is not allowed to increase or decrease the author when the manuscript is revised, so please add the authors to be added in the first draft. I will add it when I don’t add other authors to save the manuscript.I can't add an author because it took more than a month to accept it.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: EP


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-01 01:48:17
Attach the length requirement for the reference of the person to select:"It should be clear that papers of a size which exceeds 8000 words (including text, references, figs and tables), cannot be further processed for publication. Each fig/table is counted for 300 words.Please check that no more than 10 – 15 % of the references are from the same journal and no more than three references are from the same author.Finally, avoid parts of text which have been published previously in other papers of yours. ..
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | EP

Author: EP


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-01 01:46:39
an article on urban runoff, submitted to receive for six months.Except for the majority of the month, I used to reply to Review. It was one and a half months spent in the editor.From the time of submission to the review, from receiving the reviewer comments to receiving each two weeks.I did not see the word count before submitting the manuscript. When the review comments came back, the number of words was attached to the letter (8000 words, including chart documents! One picture, table according to 300 words).So I need to greatly reduce the length of the article.It’s quite boring.Others are fine, and the journal is not bad.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | EP

Author: happy


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 9.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-30 22:22:24
6 In the past, after the editor, I have been in the state of Reviewers invited until the end of January of the following year..It was really depressed during this period...In the end, I wanted to retract the manuscript, but, after finally, I reviewed the reviewer. The reviewer used two reviewers recommended by me, so I accepted it..Accepted the next day after the minor repair, and online after one week...As for publish, I don't know. It is estimated that this year I can see the journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | happy

Author: luowan@yzu.edu.cn


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-25 11:02:57
Editors and reviewers are still more serious, and have been carefully modified to be acceptd.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | luowan@yzu.edu.cn

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-16 02:21:00
This journal has a bad reputation. In order to increase the impact factor, the self-citation rate is very high. It is explicitly required that the author quote many articles in this journal for nearly two years, and it is very popular in the industry.Many people's contempt
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 水资源管理
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-20 18:23:00
Impact factor growth soon. The European Water Conservancy Society journal, one of the articles, review time is about 8 months, minor repairAfter accepting, one of the journals with good water resources, but it should not be considered top.When editing, the editor said that it is necessary to add an article that references the journal in recent years, which may be the reason for its impact factor soaring
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*