TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

It’s a disgusting journal which gave some comments casually and rejected the articles from outsiders. The valueless articles of the editor’s students can be basically accepted, which can be published in less than one month. The previous editor did not do like this; it seems that this journal is about to degenerate.

(9) Thank | rubbishtre

It was not as easy as what posted below. TRE is still very difficult, second only to the two journals, EJOR and COR. The manuscripts of many people around me, including the professor, were criticized as good-for-nothing by the reviewers. Even if it was accepted, it had been strictly revised for several times.

(12) Thank | 仗剑走天涯

It was submitted on October 2d9, 2018. In the first round, major revision was required on December 1. I submitted the revised manuscript on December 31. In the second round, major revision was required on February 29, 2019. I submitted the revised manuscript on February 22, and it was accepted on March 30. The review efficiency of Theory and Research in Education is high. The reviewers were given one month in each round. It can be published in 3 months if it is accepted after a revision.

(5) Thank | 。。。。

I submitted once and got the rejection letter the next day. The letter is as follows: Thank you for choosing Transportation Research as a channel for publishing your manuscript. After reading the paper, I agree that the topic of the paper is interesting and impressive. However, I still have two main questions. First, the paper, including its subject matter and content, may not be suitable for the journal’s aim and scope. The evidence I have supporting this is that, no relevant TRE references have been cited for discussion to show that this paper will be of interest to most TRE readers. Second, the research content of the paper may not meet the publication standards. TRE prefers a paper that can clearly demonstrate its incremental contribution to the field of transportation and logistics. Relevant literature should be cited to clarify the following: (1) the importance of solving this problem and the method for solving the problem, (2) the novelty and unique characteristics of the proposed method relative to published methods or models, and (3) important findings and management insights from analyzing the results. Unfortunately, I didn’t find sufficient rationales and discussion to clarify the issue. Specifically, this paper seems to be application-oriented, while the methodological innovation over published models appears to be weak.

(1) Thank | changting12@mails.ucas.ac.cn

17 On January 20th, the company received the review and comments on March 15th. After two revisions, it was accepted on August 5th.The review speed is very fast. The editor-in-chief asks the external auditor to return all opinions within 45 days, and the modification request returns within 60 days.The content of the paper needs to be innovative, the workload is enough, and there must be practical application.

(1) Thank | 菜鸟一枚

Journal Homepage: www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13665545

(0) Thank | Anonymous

transportation research series is almost the authority of their respective transportation fields.The part e impact factor has been increasing year after year, and the level of the article has been greatly improved compared with previous years.The hit rate is not so low, but it can't reach 50%. I feel that 30% is not much.

(0) Thank | Anonymous