Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

ENGINEERING STRUCTURESNEW webinar covering conference tips and strategies – Register now.

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[ENGINEERING STRUCTURES]Hello, you are Visitor Number 54635 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Journal Title AbbreviationsENG STRUCT
ISSN0141-0296
h-index114
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
3.771.6282.089
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Civil and Structural Engineering
Q131 / 288

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)19.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30415/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/engstruct/
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume1042
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0141-0296%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.0 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 19.8 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Data from Elsevier: 35%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 3.5 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ENGINEERING STRUCTURES】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on ENGINEERING STRUCTURES: Write a review
Author: pe_sh@sina.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-20 22:23:20
Fast responses. Email reminders at each stage. Innovation requirements are high. Be careful with language and formatting. Personally, I feel that Engineering Structures is a very good journal, especially the structural direction.

(2) Thank | pe_sh@sina.com

Author: 孤独的黑板擦


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-09 21:03:30
2018.04.12 Sunmited to journal2018.05.14 Rejected (poor language)2018.05.22 Re-injection after retouching, Sunmited to journal2018.06.24 Under Review2018.09.09 Revise 1 (3 experts)2018.09.17 Add a review expert opinion2018.10.17 Rework2018.11.04 Revise 22018.11.07 Rework2018.11.27 Revise 32018.11.29 Rework2019.01.08 has been Reviewer Invited2019.01.09 Accept
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 孤独的黑板擦

Author: Wendy


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-24 14:51:13
2018.5.17 Submission2018.7.30 Received modification notice2018.9.20 repaired back2018.9.23 HiringThe submission process went smoothly, and it was only under review in mid-June. The review results received in July.In fact, at the beginning of the submission, I was very impressed. Because there was no experiment, it was pure theoretical analysis software development. I didn’t expect the three reviewers to evaluate well. There are two recommended direct accepts, and the questions raised by these two reviewers are very good.Depth, very professional!There is also a reviewer who asked very many questions, but the technical content is not high, mainly let me quote his thesis!According to the review comments, it was revised for nearly two months (mainly for 20 days in the summer vacation, and the time was delayed). After returning to the manuscript, the under review was displayed on the evening of September 22, and I received it after sleeping.Reviewers are very efficient!I would also like to thank sritawat kitipornchai for editing. People are very good. I hope that the journals will be better and better, and the impact factor will rise and rise!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Wendy

Author: abin


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-09 10:08:59
Submitted in July 2017, the first trial was 12 months, and the email was submitted in 6 months. However, the editor patiently responded in detail to the state of the manuscript at the time.At 12 months, I received the initial review and revised it.Three positive comments have a very critical.After submitting the revised manuscript, the second trial quickly gave a reply, modified again, and then directly acceptd.Journals have a lot of recognition in the industry, so the quality of the articles and the review requirements are strict. If you feel that the quality of the articles is too hard, it is worth a try!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | abin

Author: aruis


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-31 15:38:13
Received at Editorial Office7 Mar 2018Article revised28 Jun 2018Article accepted for publication31 Aug 2018Under review is also very fast, three reviewers, the next day after the draft is acceptd, a total of about six months, thanks to Sritawat Kitipornchai editor, very nice!I wish the journal better and better
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | aruis

Author: 宁


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-03 11:06:36
I think it's not bad.In the first three months of the trial, there were four reviewers, and all three were positive.A stricter one requires some words to be changed.After three weeks, I returned to the editor and passed it in two days.But I still like EESD and journal of structural engineering. The rigor is very high...I am often rejected, but I am still very grateful for the reviewer's comments.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 宁

Author: 新晋双一流


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-19 10:29:39
The results of the 28th day of the first trial, the three reviewers' general comments are very positive, but the specific opinions are very numerous and relatively detailed; carefully revised for two months (during the period)Something else) Received one month after returning to the manuscript.From the perspective of reviewing the journals, the reviewers and editors of the journals are very responsible. They are more sensitive to the innovation and quality of the papers. Good journals, but unfortunately our profession is not worthy of the journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 新晋双一流

Author: wentong21@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-11 16:18:11
10 was submitted in late October, the review was reviewed for more than 3 months, and on February 5th, the review comments were given. The review comments of the three reviewers were very positive, minor repair, middle meI went home for a year, submitted a revised draft in early March, and acceptd the next day, and the efficiency is very high!Before this article, I first selectd for the Journal of structural engineering. I was rejected. One of the reviewers said that my research was rubbish.....but it was indeed my own ambiguity, so I made a change and changed it later.I submited in engineering structures and received favorable comments from three reviewers, so I am very grateful to the reviewers of the Journal of structural engineering for their valuable comments!
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | wentong21@163.com

Author: lty680412@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-31 12:58:16
Exquisite language and strict review and depth of questions and the improvement of the author's level have left a deep impression.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | lty680412@163.com

Author: lty680412@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-31 20:22:31
Super Bull Magazine, thank you for your approval.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | lty680412@163.com

Author: dd


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-14 09:16:03
The journal is very bullish for more than a year before the review comments are revised. The journal is recognized by the industry for more than one month.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | dd

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-04 19:10:37
Review is still very serious, very strict, and there are many revision opinions.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: hnu


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-01-06 15:49:07
Overhaul once, return to the next month to receive
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | hnu

Author: Laoli2015


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-06-18 12:32:11
This journal is not very friendly to the author. I have one paper, three reviewers, two think it is good, and another reviewer is unfriendly or professional.It’s not a problem. Let me dismiss it one by one. After that, I’m so angry that I finally get caught up in one of the issues that are not a problem. I refused to use this journal as a Top Journal. This editor in the Asia Pacific region is not friendly, as a structure.Engineering experts, editors should be able to see that the reviewers deliberately martyrdom, but unfortunately this editor can not make objective judgments in a fair position.
Show Review in Original Language
(13) Thank | Laoli2015

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-17 16:21:00
The editor of this journal in the Asia-Pacific region used to process very fast, and now it is slower, and it will take more than a month to put it on hand.It may be more related to the volume of this journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-29 10:53:00
I selectd in December last year, and now the status is as follows: Initial Date Submitted (Dec 10, 2012); Status Date (Feb 08, 2013); Current Status (Under Review).This review process seems to be similar to hydrowater's review process. It was put down for three months, and now it has been submitted for more than four months, and a reminder letter has been sent in the middle.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-24 11:34:00
is responsible for the editor of the Asia Pacific region, and never returns the author's email.After being thrown out, I was sent to the editor for nearly 3 months, and I submitted the review for 6 months and returned to the decision state.This state lasted for more than a month, and I couldn't wait to send a letter to remind the editor. The editor still didn't return the mail, but refused directly.The opinions of the two reviewers returned are not very negative, and the article is generally good, and individual details can be supplemented.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-19 09:55:00
A well-structured journal, personal perception Computers & Structure emphasizes algorithms and theory, Engineering Structures focuses on engineering applications and analysis.After submiting once, the editor was very surprised that he did not find the reviewer. His own review comments were based on the reasons for not meeting the scope of the journal, but in fact, just before our group just got a
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [ENGINEERING STRUCTURES]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*