THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES

2018.11.30, submission. 2018.12.15, first revision required. There were 3 reviewers. Reviewer 1 thought the idea is meaningful and proposes 16 revision comments; reviewer 2 thought it was good and experimental work are very valuable, and proposes 2 revision comments, suggesting accepting with minor revisions; review 3 did not make a statement, but proposed 2 comments and 2 detailed revision suggestions; 60 days for revision was given. 2019.3.7, first resubmission of the manuscript. 2019.4.22, second revision required, when reviewer 1 and reviewer 2 agreed to accept it, reviewer 3 accepted the first reply, but further gave another comment and requested a reply. 2019.4.7, second resubmission. 2019.4.22, reviewer 3 accepted the second revision and agreed to accept it. Now waiting for the proofreading. I felt that: 1. The review efficiency is quite high. The submission will turn to under review within a week or so. The first review will be completed within 30 days and 60 days will be given for revision. The second and third review must be completed within 7 days as required by the submission system.

(5) Thank | 老沙

Dr. Chen Yu at the School of Urban Construction of Yangtze University published five papers in one year in this journal as the first author and correspondent author: “Behaviour of bird-beak square hollow section X-joints under in-plane bending,” “Experimental and finite element analysis research on cold-formed steel lipped channel beams under web crippling,” “Behaviour of square hollow section brace-H-shaped steel chord T-joints under axial compression,” “Aluminum tubular sections subjected to web crippling,” and “Numerical investigation of concrete.” You can tell how unexceptional this journal is. Basically, as long as one reviewer agrees to accept a paper, the paper will be accepted.

(7) Thank | 梁梁

Magazine is very general, relatively easy, please don't exaggerate, find a few wrong articles, all want to comment

(4) Thank | 中北大学

The journal is not bad, but the impact factor is slow. It is almost no increase this year.

(0) Thank | kkk

Self-citation rate is a bit high, worried about being kicked out of SCI

(0) Thank | yu

I saw the reply on the 13th floor and I just felt funny.I am not Professor Chen himself, but I have reviewed his manuscript.It is worthy of appreciation for people to send 5 articles a year. Maybe it has been done for a long time.Don't eat grapes, don't be sour.My own master is the top 5 schools in China.The Ph.D. is the top 30 school in the world.But I don't think I will smash people's homes like this. I want to evaluate one's academics and not to look at people's personalities.

(5) Thank | xia

By this article, Dr. graduated

(0) Thank | xuly

Magazine is still possible, there can be no experiment, no theory, I am pure simulation, I did not expect to accept.

(0) Thank | 野狼

A lot of articles only have simulations, and the self-citing is too high.

(0) Thank | ...

From the field of mechanics, it is still possible, and many documents have great reference value.In the mid-October 2017, the revised comments received in early January 2017, the first reviewer requested several references, and the second reviewer gave proof of the theoretical method, so the honest revision, added a chapter, carefully after the polish, in the

(0) Thank | joekingway@126.com

I feel that this journal is actually good, I don’t know what kind of mentality is bad for people who have a bad evaluation on this journal.It seems that they all think that a journal in that journal is more watery.If you do the direction of the steel structure, you can do one of them.The key is the quality of your own paper, not in the journal itself.Difficult to not represent it, many people recognize ASCE articles, how is it, ASCE is just a hodgepodge, slow review, does not mean good.Just like you can't compare structural articles to people who do mechanics every day.

(10) Thank | xiao

is a very general journal, it is relatively easy, self-referencing is too high,

(0) Thank | 柔柔弱弱

This journal is easy, feels watery

(0) Thank | 123

Soon, better

(4) Thank | 11

2016.11.13Submission2017.8.22 received the modification notice, modified one month, returnCurrently under review, the journal is too slow, and the publication is cautious, but the journal is still a good journal. In terms of thin-walled structure, fame is still possible.I hope I can be acceptd!

(0) Thank | 674964178@qq.com

is a junk journal, many articles are only simulation, there is no theoretical basis, and the self-citing is too high.

(0) Thank | 33

1 Submitted in mid-December 20142 Received the revised request in mid-March 20153 spent half a month to amend, and will be accepted after 1 week, around mid-April 2015.4 Contact the publisher for 2 weeks, etc.
 The publication was confirmed on May 15, 2015 and can be searched online.Published in September 2015.

(0) Thank | liu

After rushing to graduate, I rushed the editor 2 times and 2 months to return the result to modify the content and retouched and published a share for 3 months. After the appointment, I spent less than 1 week on the line

(4) Thank | zhaoyiyu1990@126.com

This year's impact factor is 1.231. The journal is not bad in the civil engineering industry.The editor-in-chief of the United Kingdom submitted the manuscript at the end of February and returned to the revision in mid-June. The review was about three and a half months.The revised manuscript will be received more than one month after returning.The journal's submission status does not change until there is a result, often showing with editor until there is a result.The revised draft also shows the revised submitted to journal until accepted.From submission to employment for about 6 months.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

一字慢

(0) Thank | Anonymous