POWDER TECHNOLOGY

quite good, 3 months overhaul, one week after returning directly accepted, thanks

(1) Thank | 花花

2017.7.10 began to submit the manuscript, 10.27 began to review the manuscript, 12.28 a repair, it is a major overhaul, 2 reviewers raised some questions, gave 2 months, 2018.2.5 return;3.1 secondary rework, a reviewer has a problem, also gave 2 months, 3.9 return, 3.14 direct accept.The first article in my life, although it took a long time (8 months), the results were good.Thanks to the editors and reviewers!

(2) Thank | xiaxu

for two months, the editor directly refused the manuscript, there is no reason, it is speechless

(0) Thank | 11

From submission to final publication for about 8 months

(1) Thank | 打不死的小强

review speed is relatively slow, not very suitable for students who are urgently publishing papers, but the industry's recognition can be, it is also an old-fashioned journal, and it is already a district in JCR, I hope the journals are getting better and better.

(2) Thank | 东大大鱼人

真The junk journal, with the editor for a month, did not move, never seen the editor did not make a decision for a month, sent to the trial or refused to come to a happy ah

(17) Thank | None

Speed ​​is not very fast, the direction of the distribution is particle reunion and fragmentation, edited as Aibing B Yu, submitted at the end of May, almost 20 days with editor, June 20, under review, 8On the 20th, the review comments came back. Two reviewers gave a total of nine comments. The first reviewer had a serious problem. He thought that the explanation was incorrect and unreasonable, and there was still a section that was not sufficient.The editor gave the overhaul, and then answered the first reviewer's question in detail. The 9 comments Detailed Responses wrote a total of 2000 words. On September 11th, the return draft was submitted. Then, on October 9th, the second review came back, and the editor gave it to Xiao Xiu.The first reviewer agreed to receive, the second reviewer said that the language is a bit problematic, there is no other opinion, it should be a small problem, in general, the editor has a long time, the first trial is 2 months, and the review is 1 month.I feel that I need 4 months before and after. It is not too fast. I hope that I can finish the repairs. The first SCI teacher of Scholastic has no guidance at all. From the experimental platform to the writing of the thesis, the research is not complete, and the research is not suitable, and it is cherished.

(11) Thank | Achilleus

was selectd in the journal of cleaner production and was rejected. Later, the bossSaid to hand him to select, it is said that he changed the journal, it seems to review the draft for two months, in mid-April in April, there will be results in June, so it is still very fast, a reviewerIt is worth mentioning that two comments were made for minor repairs, and another reviewer directly said that he refused to say anything else, and the editor finally gave it a rejection.The boss said that there is usually a person who has refused to review the manuscript, and he can only find the journal again.The boss changed the opinion according to the opinions of the first reviewer, and changed the select. Now it seems to be in the review, and I don’t know how the situation is.I hope everything goes well.

(1) Thank | o(∩_∩)o 哈哈

Maybe it’s my luck. I’m not as slow as the one mentioned below.Less than two weeks for review. Review for one month. Return to receiving after minor repair. Less than 2 months before and after.

(1) Thank | vino

The editor is good, the efficiency is very high, it took four months from the time of submitment to the recruitment, and the result of returning to the overhaul review is a bit slow, almost two months, reviewThe manuscript is more responsible and has raised more than 20 questions, but it is not a problem that is too sloppy.After that, it was very fast, and it was acceptd less than a week after submitting the minor repair.

(0) Thank | mobu123

Editor is very good, but the review is very slow, and the urgent use of children's shoes is carefully considered.

(1) Thank | 0001000

First trial 1 monthModified for 2 monthsSecond instance 2 monthsA total of 5 months

(0) Thank | none

This journal is quite irresponsible, slow to die!!!!!!It is slower than Chinese review!!!!The revised manuscript has been submitted for two months, and there is no news at all!!!!!I did not respond to the reminder letter!!!!It’s really a day!!!!!!Oh shit!!!!!!It is recommended not to select for this journal!!!!!It is too slow!!!!

(3) Thank | 123

赞一个,13 January submitted, 16 March minor revision, 9 April Accepted.

(9) Thank | aobamamaidi

Jun 09. 2015 Submitted to journalJun 11, 2015 With editorJul 04, 2015 Under reviewSep 25, 2015 major revisionOct 3, 2015 Tianjin submitted to journalOct 5, 2015 under reviewDec 10, 2015 Accepted

(2) Thank | Gloria

is a bit slow, anxious friends are better to change one

(1) Thank | hrbustst@163.com

The processing speed of this journal is really fast. I usually submit in foreign SCI for half a year, which takes only 2-3 months.It feels easier compared to other 2 district journals, probably because of the half-monthly journal.But in May of this year, the journal seemed to be reformed and became a lot stricter.There may be too much processing, and students who need to submit a draft should be cautious.P.S: Aibing B Yu is very serious as an editor in the Asia Pacific region, give him a compliment!

(11) Thank | CSU

The 2013 SCI division was upgraded from Zone 3 to Zone 2.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Received at Editorial Office: 10-SEP-2012Article revised: 2-SEP-2013Article accepted for publication: 21-OCT-2013

(0) Thank | Anonymous

August 12, 2013I have already received, why haven’t I received any emails related to the publication yet?It’s been 2 months now. At least it’s online.I don't know if other students have had a similar situation. What should I do with this situation?Thank you, everyone

(2) Thank | Anonymous

10, submission on the 1st, 4th editor invited, pray!!!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has been with the editor for three months or not, I don’t know if there is any review

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This editor is quite irresponsible, and the revised manuscript returns more than 20 days.Still under review.At the end of the first review, it took a month to give advice, or in the case of a draft.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Under Review 40 days, apologetic

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Augmented in the first month of the month, it has been 20 days now, and is still in the editorial state, which is more efficient than Li Academician.The time is too low.I really hope that I can speed up.

(0) Thank | Anonymous