X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

POWDER TECHNOLOGY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[POWDER TECHNOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 128806 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePOWDER TECHNOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsPOWDER TECHNOL
ISSN0032-5910
E-ISSN1873-328X
h-index119
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.701.0791.773
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: Chemical Engineering (all)
Q130 / 279

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)18.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/504094/description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/POWTEC
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE SA, PO BOX 564, LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND, 1001
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationSWITZERLAND
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1967
Annual Article Volume941
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0032-5910%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.4 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 11 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Data from Elsevier: 32%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【POWDER TECHNOLOGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)
  Reviews on POWDER TECHNOLOGY: Write a review
Author: tianbing


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-11-27 23:07:54
7.8, submitted to journal; 7.9, with editor; 7.22, under review; 9.2, under review; 9.23, major revision; 10.9, revision submitted to journal; 10.10, with editor; 10.11, under review; 10.29, under review; 11.11, minor revision; 11.12, revision submitted to journal; 11.13, under review; 11.25, accept. If you submit to this journal, you should prepare yourself well in the mind that at least half a year was needed. Mine took more than 4 months, but it was a slow one among the articles I have submitted for time being. I feel that the editor Yu of Monash University processed quickly every time, and the time given to the reviewers may be too long. There were two reviewers in the first review, one minor revision, and the other one may be major revision. There were 6 questions in total, and all of them were professional. In fact, three of the questions were the ones that I wanted to avoid at first. The editor required major revision. In the second review, the first reviewer accepted it and the second one required minor revision and said that the number of one figure was wrong. I thought it was accepted directly after the submission of the revision, but unexpectedly, the editor sent it for review again. But this time it was OK which took less than two weeks.

(4) Thank | tianbing

Author: 阿飞的


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-11-20 14:46:05
The manuscript was submitted on July 22, 2019. I urged it in one month and a half and didn’t receive any reply; it was still under review. It was sent for external review in more than two months (after submission). It was sent for external review twice, I felt that the reviewers found didn’t gave comments. I kept waiting after the manuscript was sent for review again. Until October 25, the article was rejected. Three reviewers: Insufficient innovation, this is no way. As for the comments of the other two reviewers, I personally thought that they did not seem to understand, or did not know how to get some data, so the suggestions given made me very speechless. Having seen so many similar articles about fluidized bed numerical simulation in Physical Therapy, I personally thought that everyone’s article is not very innovative. To some data, if the right reviewer is not found, he really can’t understand it! It maybe that the impact factor has risen this year, so it is more difficult. There was no problem with the grammar of the article, and it was not polished after writing. The reason for rejection was mainly because of (lacking in) innovation, and the impact factor had increased. It took 3 months in total, and now I am facing a lot of pressure to graduate! I have given up the journals in Q3 and decide to submit the manuscript to the journals in Q4. I had a dream at the beginning, but then I didn’t care anymore. Everything was for me to graduate. Finally, I feel that everyone is talking about innovation. It is better to see whether the articles in the past have great innovations, and whether the current articles are very different from the previous ones, and the analysis points are different. Ah! Hurry up and submit the manuscript to a journal in Q4.

(10) Thank | 阿飞的

Author: wnn_flying


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-10-31 21:42:40
Submitted on September 30, with editor on October 3, rejected on October 31. The reason for rejection was as follows: We have received your manuscript. However, the quality of the English grammar does not meet the standards for Powder Technology and your submission, in its current form, would be unable to receive a judicious assessment based solely on its technical merits. Because of this, we must reject your submission. The reason for rejection is a bit interesting.

(2) Thank | wnn_flying

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-27 11:18:00
My overall impression of this journal: The post-review time is longer, the first review round is OK, the overall feeling is that your paper requires comprehensive research, and the requirements for innovation are not particularly high, though; shouldn’t be extremely difficult to get accepted to this journal.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 小学妹爱学习


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-08 11:08:44
Two and a half months of receiving (half a month after receiving the review comments).After minor repairs, 1 day later, receive.3 reviewers, 2-3 questions per person.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 小学妹爱学习

Author: 1


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-30 21:15:03
I have never seen such an irresponsible editor.Fan Liangshi is really bad.The first time I said that the language should be polished; after the re-injection, the reminder was retouched, and he was embarrassed to write the e-mail and sent a mistake...This is delayed for three months!!!Then, when I was sent to the trial, the mail was sent another error, saying that the review comments were back!!!Edit is really bad
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1

Author: yilan


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-24 11:06:32
The quality of the journal is very good, the editors and reviewers are very professional, a total of two reviewers.Submitted on May 3;Overhaul on September 23;Submitted on October 10th;November 10 with editor;November 13, required reviews completed;December 20 accept.R1 is going back to repair, the middle editing process is slower, but the result is good, and the line is cherished!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | yilan

Author: 冲2区


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-22 11:49:53
December 4th, December 22nd is still with the Editor state, reminded 2 times did not use
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 冲2区

Author: XHC


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-28 10:58:03
has been in the editor's hands with editor for 35 days, this speedYes, I don't know if this editor is part-time
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | XHC

Author: Dream Blue


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-30 07:28:17
Received at Editorial Office 15 Mar 2018Article revised 23 Jul 2018Article accepted for publication 29 Aug 2018It is slightly slower than other journal editors.Others are not bad.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Dream Blue

Author: songyl


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-20 16:51:05
: Submitted for 6 months, today gave the major revision
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | songyl

Author: jy598596159@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-10 08:26:06
2017.7.6;2017.7.22 rejection, language problems, need to touch up;2017.12.4 re-submit PT;With editor and under review is fast;2018.4.24 to overhaul;Carefully revised, 2018.6.5 submitted revised draft;2018.6.12 under review;2018.8.9 accept.The overall feeling is that the PT journal is very quick to review, and for Asians, generally the last manuscript needs language retouching. The comments made by the reviewers are also very pertinent, and 16 comments are made. It is really bullish.However, the results are very good, I really appreciate PT and editor L.-S. Fan.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | jy598596159@163.com

Author: jhq


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-05 15:20:55
It’s almost half a month or with the editor!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | jhq

Author: Freedom


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-03 17:12:39
It’s almost 3 months since the submission, or under review.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Freedom

Author: songyl


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-28 11:38:18
has been submitted for 4 and a half months, still under review.好慢
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | songyl

Author: 1132387382@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-25 10:51:19
It’s been two months, still editing it, too slow
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1132387382@qq.com

Author: Sun


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-06 01:44:21
4 Reviewers, the review is too slow, there is a reviewer requesting very high
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Sun

Author: 1490482558@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-23 20:50:42
It is still 50 days or with editor
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1490482558@qq.com

Author: ly


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-23 00:06:44
is too slow, it is recommended that you do not select, slow can not stand, with the editor actually does not change for a month.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ly

Author: 123


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-20 12:38:45
submitted for one month orWith editor,, is slower than before, maybe there are too many manuscripts.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 123

Author: 花花


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-16 17:02:18
How is the journal so slow now, submitted for two months or with editor
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 花花

Author: 2535879510@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-15 17:06:14
Journal is very good,The editor-in-chief was very fast, and it was processed very quickly after the select. The external trial was given to Xiaoxiu in about two months. After the revision, it was submitted again and soon it was accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 2535879510@qq.com

Author: 散漫


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-07 13:36:23
Received:2018.1.7Received revised: 2018.3.1Accepted: 2018.4.4Overall, the difficulty is not very large, and the particles are more prone.The article is a bit more innovative.Two reviewers, each reviewer has about five questions.The article has arrived at one of the editors, Aibing Yu, which is faster.Is the journal
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 散漫

Author: 幸运者


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-07 12:50:00
Feeling editors are more serious, reviewer is more cautious
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 幸运者

Author: 花花


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-24 11:28:24
quite good, 3 months overhaulAfter returning one week, I accepted it directly. Thanks to
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 花花

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)

Start your review of [POWDER TECHNOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service