X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH]Hello, you are Visitor Number 240766 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleINDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Journal Title AbbreviationsIND ENG CHEM RES
ISSN0888-5885
E-ISSN1520-5045
h-index197
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.600.8781.033
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Q154 / 336
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Chemical Engineering (all)
Q153 / 279
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Chemistry (all)
Q184 / 398

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)12.30%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.acs.org/journal/iecred
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://acs.manuscriptcentral.com/acs
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER CHEMICAL SOC, 1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20036
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyBiweekly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume2145
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0888-5885%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.6 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 50%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    Next    Last  (To Page
/5)
  Reviews on INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-25 08:04:00
1Day 23rd contribution, March 11th reply, overhaul, review comments are very detailed, but all agree to publish, MarchThe revised manuscript was submitted on the 19th and was directly acceptd on March 22.The editor is very responsible.Feel that the data is comprehensive and a little innovative.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-19 11:42:00
I am a chemical engineering professional, but do the nanomaterial direction.In general, nano-submitment of IECR is still relatively good.A certain degree of innovation, coupled with systematic experimental submitigation, can be a high probability.Even if the problems cannot be solved in some areas, sincere explanations can be given to reviewers.Good journals, short review period, expert reliable, feasible!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-16 15:30:00
On October 16th, the letter returned on November 18th, asking for minor grammar and answering a few minor questions.Because the study abroad went to the Institute for 2 weeks, the revised manuscript was submitted on December 22.On January 10th, the return letter requested that the grammar (0+0) be revised carefully, and the revised draft should be received on the 21st.The online article on February 1 was published.The editor is very responsible, and very nice. The first time I submitted a lot of questions that I don’t understand, I explained it in detail.The selected reviewers were also quick to review, and the understanding of the article was also very detailed. I helped a lot of valuable opinions and made me learn a lot.In short, I feel that this journal is good, and my first article is still very memorable...Immediately after the second article was submitted to chem.lett, it was less than a month.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-14 15:28:00
is an innovative journal. The editor is very responsible, like one, and the engineering class is included in the calculation!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-13 16:17:00
ACS journal, relatively good, publishing frequency: weekly,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-28 17:33:00
October 28, 2012, selectd out, January 31, 2013 review reply, a total of more than 3 months a few days.Waiting during the review period is a must, and it is a bit painful, but it is still a minor repair. It will be thrown out after 8 days, and it will be directly received on February 13.In short, it is quite smooth, the editor is very responsible, the speed of the proof is also very fast, and it is also very detailed, in short, I feel that this journal is good.Personally think that the IECR, as long as the data is comprehensive, clarified and reasonable, will be accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-27 17:57:00
selectd on January 17 this year, now more than a month has passed, so far no news,The speed of ACS journals should not be so slow.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-20 17:19:00
The flame retardant direction of polymer materials.Submitted on December 14th, three review comments on January 26th, after the reply on February 5th received
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-18 11:29:00
More than two months, no news, looking forward to...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-26 16:53:00
51 days to return to the two reviewers, it is recommended to receive after the amendment, giving 13 questions and comments.Edit to overhaul, 6 weeks.After 16 days, I returned and wrote 9 pages.Received directly after 12 days.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-24 23:28:00
First trial for more than two months, requiring overhaul, submitted a revised draft in about three weeks, returning opinions after nearly two months, minor repair, just submitted a revised draft, hope to be able to!After two weeks, the editor gave the final opinion and acceptd!The article was completed for 6 months, the journal efficiency is not bad, and the editor is also very good!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-08 12:35:00
Going out for 20 days, no news!Looking forward to.........
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-05 13:07:00
12 submitted in March, returned to the first-instance opinion in three months, there is hope, but the second review is sharper.But the editor did not reject it directly.So seriously revised, the second time to get two reviewers, but there is still a wonderful case to understand the article's content without questioning the article's argument.However, it was acceptd less than a week after the third revision of the revised manuscript.It’s finally tossed.The general feeling is that this journal is not so difficult. As long as it is well-trained, there are no low-level mistakes, and there are no major problems with innovation. The reviewers will help you to make the article look like a step by step.After nine months, there was finally a result.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-30 10:15:00
High quality, very good journals, worthy of one of the three major chemical journals.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-28 16:45:00
Three reviewers, two minor repairs, one disapproved of receiving, edited to minor repair minor revision, 21th select back to revision, after a week, still no news, do not knowHave you submitted the trial again, has anyone had a similar experience?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-27 18:40:00
This is my first SCI, so I am very grateful to the journal.After half a year, I finally received it. After the first time I selectd out, the comments from the reviewers were quite sharp, but they still helped us a lot.Return to overhaul, supplement experiments, and verify the theory. After more than a month of intensive experiments and revisions, seriously respond to the opinions of reviewers.The second trial was sent back to the original reviewer, one for further explanation of the concept, another for acceptance, and a few days to modify the select.Receive notification after one week.Pretty happy!The suggestion is that the data must be sufficient and innovative.I wish you all the best!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-24 00:24:00
As of September, all three articles I submitted to the ICR were accepted for publication, although two of them were re-submitted after revision, but the results were not satisfactory.I feel that this journal is one of the top three chemistry of the chemical industry, but in general, the difficulty is not particularly large.As long as you have innovations, you don't have to be an innovation that has never been seen before. As long as you explain it reasonably well and logically, you can generally be acceptd.Of course, for the reviewer, whether it is praise or criticism, or martyrdom, as long as there is doubt, you must patiently explain, and have a technical explanation (this I have to admire my boss is very powerful), the bestI have to say more thank you.Finally, I wish everyone can publish an article as soon as possible and get a degree to graduate soon!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-07 15:58:00
The first article has been published in the journal, the review period is relatively short, the review comments need to be carefully responded, and the article has no major chapter changes.Initial submitment on July 24, return to review on August 24, three reviewers, two minor repairs, one overhaul (proposed nearly 20 questions, 5 major categories, including 4 5 in each category)Small problem), the editor gave three months of repair time; wrote 11 pages of review reply (boss asked for enrichment, and finally reluctantly, reduced to 7 pages), re-delivered on October 8th, returned results on the 18th, asked for partial replyThe content of the reviewer is added to the article; the 25th is thrown again, and the 30th is completely received.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-26 08:23:00
Give a comment after a week, saying that my research direction is not suitable for publication in this journal. It is recommended to select for other more professional journals.Still quite fast
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-24 16:38:00
Although not acceptd, the reply is still very fast, from uploading the manuscript to the decision only three days.The reason for refusal is that there are too few readers interested in my article, and it is recommended to switch to a more professional journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-19 19:27:00
Today is a memorable day, as the first article (actually the second one, the first one has no news) is quite gratifying.From the beginning to the end, I was stunned by myself, except for some suggestions given by the teacher after the review comments came out.Submission on July 16th, overhaul on August 16th, and 38 suggestions from four reviewers. I have collapsed after the change. There are more than 6,000 words in the reply, and I will return on September 25th and October 11th.When I went to the Xiaoxiu opinion, I made three mistakes and submitted it on the same day.Later, due to the change of the title, I re-signed the electronic agreement, and thought that there were too many forms, and I put a few more into the SI, and delayed some time. Finally, I was accepted today, so happy.Speaking of the article, personally feel that as long as you seriously write, there must be innovation
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-19 10:57:00
This is my first article, to commemorate, July 3rd submission, August 1stThe revised comments need to be overhauled. I feel that the journal is very fast (but later it is a tragedy), but the boss is an acute person. I have to reply to it in three days, and in the summer vacation, I will give it back with a hard scalp.On September 3rd, the opinions of the revised manuscript had to be changed again and there was a reviewer who was very angry. There was no way to make a manuscript that was honestly and seriously, and he selectd on September 6, and finally accepted on October 16.The overall feeling of editing is very nice, as if it is generally not directly rejected, will give review comments.It took a lot of more than 100 days from submission to acceptance, and it feels very slow.But fortunately received, thank you editor, boss and others
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-10 15:16:00
is submitteding this journal today, but in the submission column, I have to recommend 6 reviewers, but also specific address and contact information.You guys, how do you select?Please come over and give pointers to it
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-06 21:33:00
6 Month 6 was refused by langmuir one day, saying that it does not meet the contents of the publication.On June 8th, it switched to the ISOR.It entered the waiting process. On August 8th, the editor wrote back the letter. The first review lasted for 2 months, which was faster than other people.The editor in the initial review letter said that it needs to be significantly revised, that is, overhaul, but also said that may be accepted, I feel that the possibility of being received is not small.I looked at the 16 questions of the three reviewers. There were no language errors. I didn’t comment on my shame. Most of them were because I wrote too simple and did not understand. In fact, newcomers should pay attention to this, and reviewers cannotI am familiar with this article like the author, so I can't understand it myself. It is best to let a
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-06 10:05:00
journal be very fast, sometimes very slow, the first one is received early, thisA review has been two months, and I am anxiously waiting.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    Next    Last  (To Page
/5)

Start your review of [INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service