X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH]Hello, you are Visitor Number 240786 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleINDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Journal Title AbbreviationsIND ENG CHEM RES
ISSN0888-5885
E-ISSN1520-5045
h-index197
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.600.8781.033
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Q154 / 336
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Chemical Engineering (all)
Q153 / 279
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Chemistry (all)
Q184 / 398

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)12.30%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.acs.org/journal/iecred
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://acs.manuscriptcentral.com/acs
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER CHEMICAL SOC, 1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20036
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyBiweekly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume2145
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0888-5885%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.6 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 50%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    Next    Last  (To Page
/5)
  Reviews on INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-20 09:34:00
Four months of overhaul, two reviewers, four review comments, revised after half a month, waiting for 16 days to receive directly, praise editor, praise reviewer.In my opinion, reviewers still pay great attention to the practical application value, that is, the practical significance of the research done.When writing an article, you must have a clear idea. I hope that the students in the future will get more fuel. Let's work together!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-12 09:18:00
Submitted in mid-September, returned to the first trial at the end of October, and delayed a little time in the middle. On November 11th, the Singles returned to the revised draft, 8 hours less than directly accepted! Praise. porf. FreemanThe speed of processing.The overall impression: I feel that the article should be a bit new, and more importantly, the scientific and practical importance of the work done. This may be discussed and discussed with emphasis.Finally, I wish that the IECR will be better and better.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-10 18:51:00
I selectd on October 11th. I asked for the agreement on the 14th. I heard that the review speed was very fast. I saw your information and suddenly felt it.Wait a long time!Anxiety~~~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-25 10:14:00
I would like to ask you seniors, about the Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research journal, where can I see the review status?I selectd for 10.19. Three days later, the editor asked to re-upload a list of reviewers. The result was always in Submitted to Editorial Office. I didn't see whether it was Under review or other status. What is the reason??
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-12 08:34:00
3 On the 1st of the select, I checked the status this morning and said some personal feelings.I think that the current IECR pays more attention to innovation. If it is a job that has not been done before, and the data is relatively perfect, it is still very promising.After submitting the manuscript in March, it took more than six months to have a reviewer's opinion, and there was only one reviewer's opinion. It was urged once in the middle of three months, and the editor said that no reviewer was found.In the first instance, 17 comments were made, and it was considered that the new ideas were not enough.Fortunately, the editor Spiro D. Alexandratos is very nice, giving the opportunity to modify.Most of the comments were better answered, and a bad answer was also made. The reply was written on 7 pages.Return 2
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-23 08:31:00
manuscript under review for more than 4 months...Waiting anxiously...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-17 01:06:00
and many of the above students said the same for more than 1 month, there is no reaction waiting in the
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-15 09:45:00
first trial for nearly 4 months, overhaul, repairedWaited for 1.5 months and accepted.I feel that as long as the amount of data is enough, the chances of a slightly more innovative idea are still high.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-12 21:43:00
This journal is quite good, professionalism is very strong, the level of reviewers is very high, my article is revised after two comments, the reviewer's question is very professional, II answered the question carefully and revised the article. The revised manuscript was accepted after one week of submission.However, the attitude is still very important. This is my first SCI and I feel very lucky.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-02 15:37:00
This journal is not difficult to select, as long as you have a little innovation on your own.I submitted the manuscript on May 12 and was reworked on July 19. There are only two reviewers.Revised on July 31 and received on August 19.The editor is particularly responsible.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-02 13:56:00
The review speed is very fast. The papers are submitted in the past month. The results are three reviewers. The two evaluations are good. The third one thinks there is a place that overlaps with the previous paper.Not much innovation, the editor adopted the third person's opinion, refused to draft, helpless!Later, according to the reviewer's comments, the article was changed and re-submited in the ICr. The editor returned a week and insisted on rejecting the manuscript. Fortunately, there was not much delay in the time. The content of the article was really inferior, and my heart was still quiteConsolation, wait for the data to be sent later, I really like this journal, I want to send an article!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-23 10:38:00
The editor is good, and the reply is fast.The 20 reviewers have 20 suggestions and questions, remember to follow the format carefully.3 months review, directly revised after 1 and a half months of revision.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-06 20:58:00
is still OK, the editor is good, the reviewer is also awesome, gave 10 suggestions for revision
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-06 20:46:00
4, submitted on the 22nd, edited by Jim Yang Lee.On June 4, the first trial was completed and returned: 4 reviewers, 1, 3 reviewers believed that there were innovations, the content was good, and agreed to publish. The second reviewer believed that only one question was not clearly explained, and the fourth reviewThe manuscript believes that there is no innovation and it is not recommended to publish.The editor believes that the revision can be published.On June 11th, he revisited and responded to the opinions of the 1~3 reviewers, ruling the opinions of the 4th reviewers in detail.On July 16th, the return was completed, and the fourth reviewer agreed to accept. The third reviewer believed that there was a conceptual problem that was not changed.Returned on the second of July 19th.The format was officially accepted on August 4th.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-03 20:11:00
has submited a total of two articles:
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-26 16:15:00
submitted an article on April 5 this year, and then waited for nearly 3 months before returning to review the comments, July 1The comments from the number, the overhaul given by the editor, and the two reviewers, although there are not many problems, they are all professional, not difficult to answer, but to explain in detail, it is necessary to make up some experiments and it took more than two weeks.On the 17th, the revised draft was returned, and the result was accepted the next day. The editor did not seem to return it to the reviewer and received it directly.The time for the previous trial is relatively long, and the waiting is also anxious.But in the end it is still very fast.Although the IF has been very stable in this journal, its influence is not low. As one of the three major journals of the chemical industry, the quality is still very good.The reviewers are very professional, and personally think that as long as they answer seriously, the general problem is not big.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-16 22:47:00
Last year, when I submitted the manuscript, it was very fast. This year, the submission seems to be much slower. Like the worms, I waited anxiously.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-16 15:23:00
Submitted for one monthZero 8 days, but also a little news, waiting for ing.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-09 10:40:00
is not a manuscript too much, one month has not been submitted for review
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-05 14:08:00
May 8th, 2013, submitted, now nearly two months, a little newsNo, the state has not changed, I am worried.ACS should not be so slow, and the IECR is wekly, because it is very fast, is it the editor-in-chief that Li doesn't like Chinese people?~~~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-27 18:44:00
is almost four months old., or a little news, the state has not changed.Should I ask?It seems that the editor doesn't like the reply...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-21 19:06:00
Can you please ask the heroes, give me some advice on the preparation of this journal?I don't even know how to set the size and resolution of the graph and table, whether to prepare a text or prepare....
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-19 14:47:00
Submitted on January 24, 2013, because the reviewer's information recommended at the time was not very detailed, on February 2nd, I received an editor's reply requesting to resend a recommended reviewer'sThe list, because it has been inconvenient to go online for the New Year, has been dragged to the editor on February 23rd, and the reviewer’s information was received on March 14th. The first editor gave a very high evaluation.Add a few related literature references to suggest direct publication; the second reviewer has made two questions. The small problem is that the map is not resolved after being printed in black and white. The main problem is to ask the scheme and otherA possible scheme comparison, so as to choose a better one; the third reviewer's opinion is sharper, and six questions are asked to be taken seriously, otherwise it is not recommended to publish; final review
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-27 17:49:00
1The draft submitted on the 20th of the month is now more than 3 months. There is still no news. The copyright agreement has been signed, but the status of the submission cannot be checked online. I don’t know what the situation is.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-09 12:47:00
The direction of submission is somewhat slow. The second and third trials are about half a month longer than the first trial.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    Next    Last  (To Page
/5)

Start your review of [INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service