FUEL

On August 18th, the submission status changed to Required reviews completed. It’s been half a month. It’s still the same. What is the situation?

(5) Thank | 1134719115@qq.com

Feeding on February 12th, 2016, feedback on the review draft on April 20th, a major overhaul of 2 minor repairs, but the overhaul involves a relatively macro-level question, still very good answer, asking for half feedbackgo back!May 2nd revised feedback back!Anxiously waiting for 50 days, June 22nd email notification to accept!Huang Zuohua's editing efficiency is very high!The second SCI, the first SPE journal also said today that the use of

(6) Thank | 1014393375@qq.com

Editing teacher Li Baoqing, very very nice.Submitted in 2015.11, edited for review after 2 days.Under review for more than 4 months, sent a reminder letter to the next day to reply, to inform the reviewer.Returned to minor repairs in April, the opinions were pertinent, and returned to the revised draft after 2 weeks.5.19 receiving

(5) Thank | k_dandan@163.com

Just a review of the journal, expecting if the rise and rise

(2) Thank | 游客

4月4#Submission, always showing with editor, until today still with editorI don't know if it has been submitted for review or still under technical review.Take it easy.

(0) Thank | danilecug1@gmail.com

4Submission No. 4, has been showing with editor, until today with the editor, I do not know whether it has been submitted for review or technical review.Take it easy.

(0) Thank | danilecug1@gmail.com

15 December 25th contributionMinor repair on January 29, 16Returned on February 17, 1616 years, February 18, acceptd

(0) Thank | 笨笨熊

2015-12-02Submission, 12-07 is under review, see when the news will come out

(0) Thank | liu

After two weeks, I entered Under Review. Now more than a month, no news

(4) Thank | Anonymous

I have reviewed the manuscript for this journal and asked to return within two weeks.

(12) Thank | 得到

Everyone said that the review speed is fast, but I am under review on September 20th. Why is there no news yet?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Published in September 2012In June 2013, I returned to major revision and experienced two revisions. On August 27th, accept recently received a diagnosis that has been scheduled to be delayed until 2014. (Editors later said that they found 10 reviewers with only two consents.Reviewing) But I feel that the comments given by reviewers are still very valuable editor Akira Tomita is also very nice

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is a technical review after submission, review passed under review, waited for more than 20 days,The three reviewers, one directly drafted, the editor finally refused, may have their own level is limited, the paper is not complete!But now the speed of fuel review has increased.Come on!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

selectd once every 4 years, submitted for review, rejected by the reviewer.This time I selectd for one, started the technical review, and passed the revised technical review (technical review said that my English is not good, I passed it with a slight modification), and then the article went to the Japanese editor, and the editor directly gave it to three reasons.Refused, did not submit for review, the reasons are: 1) English is not good; 2) The length is too long, the journal requires that the editorial text is 20 pages, my text is 18 pages, plus a separate chart 35The page is too long. In fact, I re-typed it. The chart is about 20 pages in the text. 3) When I do the dynamics analysis, I use the level 1 reaction hypothesis. The editor has doubts about this.Conclusion: This journal has stricter language and space requirements!Rejected 2 times, small depressed!Ha ha

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Both of the two blogs have been paged recently, very lucky.Fuel's influence in the energy sector is still very large.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Eric Suuberg, Principal Editor, Fuel

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Eric Suuberg, Principal Editor. There is a problem with the editor's character. Don't choose this editor

(0) Thank | Anonymous

editor is very responsible, submitted on December 20th, technical modification after 2 days, returning after the change on the same day; returning the revised opinion on February 3rd, submitteding after 1 week revision, accepting on February 18th, very fast submission experience.It has been confirmed to be published in May.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

under review has been more than 3 months

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I just submitted the manuscript yesterday, I don’t know when I can give the review results and catch the chicken.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

contributed on June 13, 2012; the fourth minor revision opinion on February 2, 2013, revised; revised on February 3; received on February 12, the time for publication was undecided,for reference only...This time dragged and pulled for a total of 7 months (the last time was 3 months, this mainly depends on the revision)..The reviewers have minor revisions every time, and they have changed 4 times before and after, but they have improved after the change..The editor-in-chief is Akira Tomita of Japan, who is very responsible for handling the manuscript response speed. After the submission of

(0) Thank | Anonymous

, after technical review, the week becomes Under review, and after one and a half months, the review comments are received.One reviewer suggested partial revision and acceptance, and another reviewer raised some minor questions, but did not recommend it. The result editor directly rejected the draft.The latter reviewer was obviously a domestic compatriot, and it seems that the research direction is similar and he refused to submit the manuscript.Therefore, it is recommended that you do not recommend the Chinese as a reviewer, unless you feel that you are doing a good job or have a good relationship with it.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted for 8 months, review comments, and apply after revision.Editors and reviewers are good, it is slower

(0) Thank | Anonymous

My manuscript has been three months, or under review, pray for yourself!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

7.29 selectd, received review comments after 1 month, minor repair.9.23 Release the revised draft and accept it directly after one month.The total duration lasted less than three months.The two reviewers, the editor is Akira Tomita, it is quite smooth.Because the paper was rejected by other journals before, a reviewer is reviewing this paper for the second time.And the article has been professionally polished, so it will be so smooth.

(0) Thank | Anonymous