FUEL

Thanks to the Japanese editor, it is more responsible and efficient. The article was finally received in four months!9.26 contribution12.01 gives a revised opinion for 30 days.The opinions of the two reviewers were very positive and pertinent.12.22 repair1.30 let the touch up to modify the language2.06 repair2.10Receiving

(2) Thank | 981311653@qq.com

9th Feb 2018 IF=4.72 This year's top 5 should be more difficult.But it should be more than 4.601 last year.

(0) Thank | ericchiang

How much is the instant IF now?Can you get 5?

(1) Thank | xxyuge@126.com

The impact factor of 4.42 on December 27, 2017 is 5 points in 2018.

(1) Thank | ericchiang

The recognized authoritative journal in the field of energy, ACS's Energy FuelsIt is also listed as an authoritative journal in the field, and it is very recognized!

(2) Thank | 燃烧

TOP journal of energy and chemical industry, many high-level articles, fastHigh efficiency, from submission to acceptance for two months

(6) Thank | 东大大鱼人

has selectd 3 articles, 2 books were accepted, and 1 article was rejected.The accepts are basically a round of revisions, which cost a little more than three months.The rejected article was revised according to a large number of comments by the reviewers and was directly rejected.After switching to Computational Geosciences, minor repairs, you should be quick to accept it.

(2) Thank | cuijiangfeng_pascal@126.com

2017年6月6日 Immediate impact factor=10650/2530=4.209

(4) Thank | Ericchiang

2017.09.22SubmitIt was repaired twice in the middle.(because it was retired by a reviewer)Traveling, dragging for more than 20 days2017.11.22 AcceptHigh efficiency, new and innovative.Otherwise don't select.

(5) Thank | shaw1314

This is an old-fashioned journal of energy. The review is very strict, and the published articles are also innovative and content.Looking forward to the early one district

(2) Thank | 小白

has to say that the review speed is very fast, about 40 days to come back to the comments, four reviewers, one of which raises more questions, directly after the overhaul, for a total of 50 days.Fast and efficient, it is recommended to try it and not delay time.

(0) Thank | niuqinghe1990@163.com

The review speed is not very fast, I am more optimistic about this journal.

(0) Thank | jiyouan

required reviews completed has been more than 10 days, no structure

(0) Thank | TINY

Submission in mid-MayTechnical rework at the end of MayMinor repair in mid-JulyThen there was no news on National Day.An email was sent in September and there was no reply.Very helpless

(0) Thank | shymuaiu@163.com

is very efficient. It is less than four weeks to inform the reviewer's comments. The editor will give one month to modify the time. After the repair, the review will be returned three weeks later. Continue to minor repair, submit after revision, and accept it after five days.A total of two and a half months before and after, very efficient, give a big praise to Fuel

(1) Thank | shanjie@sxicc.ac.cn

Chinese editors who have changed in the past two years are not flattering.My research group has published 16 articles in this journal. It used to be the editor of Tohoku University in Japan or the teacher Li Baoqing of Shanxi Coal Chemical Industry.Now it is good, or the original research direction, the paper submission is not submitted for trial on the grounds that it does not meet the requirements of the publication.

(3) Thank | berry

Article history:16 February 2017 Submission18 April 2017 Received revisions, a major overhaul, a minor repair, and the deadline given by the editor is 18 May 2017, one month revision time18 May 2017 Revised29 May 2017 Email notification receptionPublished on 6 June 2017The editor is very responsible and efficient, and the revisions given are very pertinent and benefit a lot.A very quick submission experience.IF is rising very quickly.This year, the semi-monthly journal became a monthly journal, and the visual review will be more stringent.One of the top journals in the energy field has great influence.

(3) Thank | weihangy@hotmail.com

has twice met the Japanese editor, and said that it does not meet the scope of this journal, but I clearly quoted a lot of similar articles on fuel, why not say that there is no match, there is bias

(8) Thank | oil

have you met the Japanese editor?

(10) Thank | rzshan@foxmail.com

10.11-Submited to Journal10.13-with editor10.31-under review12.09-Under Editor Evaluation12.24-revise12.28-Revision Submited to Journal12.29-with editor12.29-accept12.31-proof2017.01.05-publishedThe first FUEL was very smooth. The manuscript was submitted for two and a half months. The editor was Li Baoqing, very very nice!Thank you very much for the work of Teacher Li, thank you!

(3) Thank | zlzed888@163.com

2016.5.19 Submission2016.5.21 Format revised external review2016.7.3 The external trial ended, a minor repair was overhauled, and the deadline given by the editor was 7.18.2016.7.14 Revised2016.7.26 Receiving2016.8.5 online2016.12.1 见刊

(1) Thank | lj1926@lzb.ac.cn

6 submitted on the 29th, the technical review returned on July 5th, and was submitted on July 6th; on September 22nd, the review comments were returned, and the two reviewers had a major overhaul, a minor repairOn October 5th, the review was returned; on October 21, the second-instance opinion was returned, one received directly, one received a small repair, and was repaired on October 24, and received an editor's letter on October 26; thank you very much for reviewers and editors.;sincere thanks.

(3) Thank | 1134719115@qq.com

On August 18th, the submission status changed to Required reviews completed. It’s been half a month. It’s still the same. What is the situation?

(5) Thank | 1134719115@qq.com

Feeding on February 12th, 2016, feedback on the review draft on April 20th, a major overhaul of 2 minor repairs, but the overhaul involves a relatively macro-level question, still very good answer, asking for half feedbackgo back!May 2nd revised feedback back!Anxiously waiting for 50 days, June 22nd email notification to accept!Huang Zuohua's editing efficiency is very high!The second SCI, the first SPE journal also said today that the use of

(6) Thank | 1014393375@qq.com

Editing teacher Li Baoqing, very very nice.Submitted in 2015.11, edited for review after 2 days.Under review for more than 4 months, sent a reminder letter to the next day to reply, to inform the reviewer.Returned to minor repairs in April, the opinions were pertinent, and returned to the revised draft after 2 weeks.5.19 receiving

(5) Thank | k_dandan@163.com