X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ENERGY & FUELS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[ENERGY & FUELS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 196663 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleENERGY & FUELS
Journal Title AbbreviationsENERG FUEL
ISSN0887-0624
E-ISSN1520-5029
h-index159
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
6.100.8611.159
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: Chemical Engineering (all)
Q143 / 279
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Q139 / 224
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: Fuel Technology
Q124 / 100

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)15.60%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.acs.org/journal/enfuem
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://acs.manuscriptcentral.com/acs
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER CHEMICAL SOC, 1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20036
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyBimonthly
Year Publication Started1987
Annual Article Volume1244
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0887-0624%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.4 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 76%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ENERGY & FUELS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)
  Reviews on ENERGY & FUELS: Write a review
Author: 649194035@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-11 08:41:40
5.18 Submission6.27 Received major revision comments7.18 Rework8.2 ReceivingThe efficiency is quite good!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 649194035@qq.com

Author: Dr. Howard SCUT


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-31 23:09:33
This year, the journal seems to become a little slower than before. It takes almost two moths for the first round of reviewSo as the second round.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Dr. Howard SCUT

Author: liuguoheng123@sina.cn


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-31 10:41:02
I submitted the draft on May 16th, and now on July 31st, there is still no news. Doesn't it mean that the submission period is generally 2 months?I don't know if there is such a big god.What to do now under the guidance, do you want to send an email to ask.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | liuguoheng123@sina.cn

Author: MMM的mei


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-17 19:19:15
10月24日稿November 27th Review commentsDecember 1 Online PublishingFrom submission to publication for a total of 36 days.The speed is still good.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | MMM的mei

Author: qinchao5018@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-11 13:07:13
2016.5.26 Submission2016.7.12 First-instance overhaul2016.8.7 Submission after revision2016.9.4 Second-instance overhaul (mainly language problem)2016.9.25 Submission after revision2016.10.24 Third-instance overhaul (mainly language problem)2016.11.12 Submission after revision2016.11.22 Four trials - last chance: language problem2016.12.7 Submission after revision - Attached to the retouching certificate of the retouching agency of the journal2.16.12.9 Receive
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | qinchao5018@163.com

Author: 1149004209@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-18 16:03:14
was rejected before submiting energy and fuel, and later changed the select according to the opinions of experts, waiting for 40 days of first-instance overhaul (both reviewers gave overhaul), according toThe reviewer’s comments were changed one month and then re-submitment, and the second trial was a major overhaul (in this case, there is no understanding, two reviewers, one directly receiving, one minor repair, why the editor wants to overhaul), mainly languageThe problem is now over, and I will wait until the time is almost a month before I select again. I hope I can get the approval of the editor and reviewer. After all, this is my first time SCI, I am looking forward to good luck!
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | 1149004209@qq.com

Author: 1500086842@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-25 16:47:03
6月6:SubmissionJune 8: The notification submission was unsuccessful, mainly because the recommended reviewer could not be the editor-in-chief of the journal.July 31: The results of the first trial came out, a reviewer received it directly, a minor repair, and the editor gave it to Xiao Xiu.August 8: Upload revised draftAugust 24: Receive
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1500086842@qq.com

Author: 1500086842@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-10 20:47:22
6 The first draft of the 8th select, the next day I informed that the submission was unsuccessful, and one of the reviewers I recommended is the deputy editor of the journal.I am asked to change one, followed by a duplicate in the reference, I want to modify it.Re-uploaded after the modification on the same day, returned to the review comments on July 31, a total of two reviewers, one proposal directly acceptd, no problem; another minor repair, asked three questions, the editor gave a month of minor repair, August 8Upload the revised draft and be patiently waiting for the results!I am very anxious
Show Review in Original Language
(16) Thank | 1500086842@qq.com

Author: swpuwangchong@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-22 15:47:11
Published on January 8th, 2016, and returned on February 8th. The opinions of the two reviewers were published after the overhaul. It was painstakingly changed according to the revised opinions for one month, and the revised explanation was written.After 10 pages, I returned to repair on March 5th. On March 16th, I gave a second round of rework opinions. This time, there was only one reviewer's opinion. After the minor revision, I changed it again for a week. The content of this revision is notInvolved in the article's point of view, mainly to modify some reference documents and unit uniform issues, March 19 returned to return, anxiously waited for 3 days, March 22 editorial reply, accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(19) Thank | swpuwangchong@163.com

Author: nengyuanzyq@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-10-03 20:02:08
Very efficient journals, submissions for more than 20 days to give revisions, a major overhaul for direct reception, overhaul is mainly a language issue.The third day after the repair was received, from submission to reception for a total of 51 days.There is a high demand for innovation, there are no messy format requirements when submitting a manuscript, and there is no graphic abstract or other attachment requirements. The figure can be placed in the article.Very good, there have been two papers in this journal, come on, I wish better and better!
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | nengyuanzyq@163.com

Author: nengyuanzyq@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-10-03 20:01:20
Very efficient journals, contributing more than 20 days to the revised comments, a major overhaul of a direct reception, overhaul is mainly a language problem.The third day after the repair was received, from submission to reception for a total of 51 days.There is a high demand for innovation, there are no messy format requirements when submitting a manuscript, and there is no graphic abstract or other attachment requirements. The figure can be placed in the article.Very good, there have been two papers in this journal, come on, I wish better and better!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | nengyuanzyq@163.com

Author: lezi


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-09-05 13:26:18
40 days, I received a review of the review comments, one month of revision time.After returning to the repairs, I experienced a revision of the second-instance review, Xiaoxiu.One month's revision time, there is a need to supplement the characterization analysis, and some are written in English, and because the experiments added during the first trial are not integrated into the manuscript, so this time requires the establishment of supplementary materials.After the modification, the rework comments were re-uploaded.After 5 days, I received an edit email saying that I asked to change the color of the red font in the article.The next day I received a message that the article was received.The whole process feels really not easy.The overall feeling is that although the impact of energy fuels is not very high, the review requirements are really strict, and very professional, and the requirements for the innovation of the article are high. I have experienced it, and finally I have come to the end!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | lezi

Author: 348259246@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-06-24 20:16:55
This journal is very efficient and I like to select for this journal.Two articles have been accepted and two papers have been rejected.I feel that this journal has a very high demand for IDEAR.For the format of the manuscript, the language is not very demanding at the beginning.As long as IDEAR is good, try it!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 348259246@qq.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-16 10:02:00
is a very efficient journal, and the editing work is very efficient. I can’t even think that he is working during the day.Still working at night.Grateful.I selectd at the end of June. I received the news of the overhaul on September 1. I repaired it in one month. After three days, I gave the advice of Xiao Xiu. The minor repair was repaired in about fifteen days, and received five days later.As long as the research is meticulous, has its own ideas and indirect, and the research is complete, the opportunity for publication is still very large, and I really like this journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-01 23:59:00
The standard one month for review comments.When I met a special professional reviewer, it was quite good. I added experiments and data under her guidance and added the content of the article.After 20 days of overhaul, I am re-submiting today, looking forward to good luck...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-26 21:20:00
submitted an article in this year's 6.11 (the day God launched into the air), returning comments on the 8.2, three reviewers, one overhaulOne transferred to other journals, one directly received, after nearly one month of modification, when the deadline is approaching, the revised draft was submitted, waiting for more than 20 days, 9.23 returned the opinion, saying that the format needs to be modified, then after 9.26A revised draft was issued, and two hours later, the editor sent the letter and the article was received.The feeling for this journal is that although the impact factor is not high, it is indeed a high-level journal, and the review is particularly serious.Editors and reviewers are more responsible.It was repaired twice in the middle, which was quite worrying.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-11 14:40:00
Three reviewers, one month to give advice: two minor repairs, one overhaul.Editor's comments minor repairs.Three days to repair, the next day Accept, the efficiency is very high
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-20 11:20:00
last November, the standard one month to give advice, five reviewers, two overhauls, two minor repairs,One refused.Then the editor said that it can be re-submited, with a six-month validity period.After the revision in February, the re-submitment was still the five reviewers. It was also a month to give advice, or five, two acceptances, two minor repairs, and one overhaul.After a month of revision, it seems to be accepted after submission..The journal number was issued at the end of May.It’s a good thing to grind..I feel that Japanese reviewers are more strict.The journal is very good and fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-13 19:16:00
Because it is ACS, I really want to try this journal, but I feel that the impact factor is not high and the partition is not good...I don't know if it is better with EA and EC (IF is much higher than it).I previously had an EA and a current EC, but someone always told me that elsevier is not a mainstream publisher, not as good as an ACS journal...What do you think?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-31 08:42:00
The journals with good energy field generally require 6 reviewers in the first instance.No. 3.4 submission, No. 4.10 received review comments, four reviewers, three minor repairs, and a serious and serious editor gave a major overhaul for one month.Due to the tight time, I applied for another month near the expiration date, read the article carefully from beginning to end, and returned the revised draft on June 11.After 17 days, I received a major overhaul. In January, I was a reviewer who requested an overhaul. I had to modify it according to his opinions. I had no choice but to repair it according to his requirements. I submitted a second revision after 20 days.Accepted directly after 10 days.Recommendation: Try to modify it according to the reviewer's comments.If it helps, please click on the "Help button for me" on the left, thank you!Zhu Da
Show Review in Original Language
(26) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-28 18:32:00
from the time of the last accept for about 3 months, 4 reviewers.The energy sector is a good journal, and its review period is short. There are many people around it, and it is also relatively good.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-24 13:21:00
After the submission, the editor has not passed
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-13 09:20:00
Energy & Fuels is a relatively quick review in the energy series journal.After submitting the manuscript for 1 month, I received the review comments and 2 overhauls, but all of them were recommended for publication and gave a one-month revision time.After the revision of the past one month, the revised manuscript was uploaded, and after half a month, the revised comments were received. One reviewer suggested to publish and the other gave a minor repair.The revised manuscript was uploaded after 7 days and accepted after 4 days.Friendly reminder: When recommending reviewers, 5 people are recommended, and no two can be from the same unit.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-21 21:07:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-20 18:32:00
Who can give me a submission method for this journal? Thank you
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)

Start your review of [ENERGY & FUELS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service