CLEAN-Soil Air Water

2013-4-13: Submission. 2013-4-14: Amendment. 2013-4-16: Submission under review. 2013-6-5: Paper returned, overhaul requested. 2013-6-28: Reworked and resubmitted paper. 2013-7-26: Paper returned with request for minor repair. 2013-8-2: Minor repair performed and paper returned to journal. 2013-9-11: reviewers again requested minor repair. 2013-9-13: submitted revised paper. 2013-10-1: paper accepted.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

After submitting the manuscript, it will return to the overhaul after 6 months. After the overhaul, there is no news for one and a half months. It has been the status of under review. There are still half a month to reply. I don’t know.When can I have results, too flustered, can send an email to ask the editor?

(0) Thank | 一点点

2015-3-04Submission
      Modified once in 2015-3-06
      Submitted to under review status by 2015-3-06
     A month, still in the state of review...

(1) Thank | 1453680924@qq.com

This journal seems to have risen to Zone 3, and the review speed is very fast. After 20 days of overhaul, after returning, 20 days of minor repairs, and after two months of acceptance,

(0) Thank | Anonymous

About three months, the two opinions are minor repairs, but the editor also came to the sentence to correct the English, and finally spent money to find foreigners to change the grammar, and returned to repair one and a half months to receive the

(0) Thank | Anonymous

have been underview for several months, do not select for this journal, too slow!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

submitted on March 15th, there is no result yet. Edit your vacation again. Nima calls you home to work!!!!!!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Both of them were overhauled and revised. After 1 month of training, I don’t know how the results are reviewed. Many editors are also very responsible.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I have selectdIt’s almost four months.I hope that I will get the final result this month.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I don't know why someone submitteds a select on someone. The key is that the selected reviewer is very important.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I don’t know when there is a result.In the past three months or so, the status of the under review has been three, and it has not changed for so long. Can you remind me?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Self-introduction rate thief high, reaching 30%, second in hydrology and water resources, only 46% of water resources management, self-introduction IF, but professional contempt

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Reviewer is very responsible, 2 reviewers are very fast, 2 months for review comments, 2 minor repairs, 10 days for repair, 2 days later, the editor is very efficient!!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The editor is Chinese, two reviewers, so many opinions, and finally refused, from the review commentsIt is a reviewer in China, because the review comments are very general, not like the opinions of foreign reviewers I have selectd in the past.It can be seen that the two reviewers did not understand my article at all, but actually pointed out and despised it for great reasons.It is recommended to avoid domestic editors in the future so as not to be shot by domestic reviewers

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Two reviewers say Some detailed experimental information and citation should be provided one said I do not thinkThe content of this article falls within the scope of this journal. Maybe some analytical journals will be more suitable for you Ms. The editor did not say that the non-conformity, the reviewer said no.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2012 IF=2.177

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Cast an article, just submitted it after the revision, pray for it, or pay a lot of effort.The editor is still very responsible, thank you!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The journal is OK, you can select for one

(0) Thank | Anonymous

and selectd for 2 articles in succession, all of them have been repaired, and the final news, the speed of review is still 23 months bar

(0) Thank | Anonymous