MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN

The process took about 5-6 months from submission to publication.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

To promote everyone for me, I share the experience of submission for everyone, and I was rejected 3 months after submission. Reasons, directions do not match

(3) Thank | 芊芊芦苇

The editorial attitude is particularly good. Sending two emails will be processed immediately after the reminder.A good journal, the impact factor is rising year by year.Due to the reason of the intermediate reviewer, the progress of the submission is a bit long, but there are other people in the lab who will return soon after the select, and the editing process is very efficient.

(0) Thank | Amy

04/apr/2017 submit15/apr/2017 send for review22/june/2017 major revision Super overhaul, four reviewers, and the wording is also very sharp..It is very troublesome to modify, and I plan to switch to it.After browsing, the Chinese articles in this journal are not high in proportion, and the requirements for language and data are very high.

(1) Thank | 李欣

大水刊 This can count 1 district laugh dead people garbage

(7) Thank | laji

Environmental field 3 District Dashui published the heat of water biology became top really

(10) Thank | hhh

has been submitted for one and a half months and is still under review.Submitted for review one week after submission.The official website shows an average speed of 1 month in the first trial.

(3) Thank | leegaa

has selectd for 10 days or with editor, I don't know how long it will take to review the manuscript.Do you want to review the draft fee?

(0) Thank | 小熊猫

has selectd for 10 days or with editor, I don’t know how long it will take to review the manuscript.Do you want to review the draft fee?

(1) Thank | 小熊猫

Let me share it.In our laboratory for nearly 5 years, we have submited in about 8 articles in the journal.Four of them were rejected.2 articles were around 1 week and were rejected by the editor because they did not match the theme.The remaining two were rejected after the review.The fastest article, reviewed for 46 days.The remaining five articles, the initial review time are: 3 months, 4 months, 2 months, 5 months and 7 months.Overall, the review of this journal is not fast.It is not very suitable for students who want to graduate.But the editor's attitude is good, this is the advantage.

(5) Thank | JTA

review for four months, minor repair, repair 10 days to accept

(2) Thank | bznq

sent 2 articles, submitted in July, received minor repair opinions in August, accepted at the end of August, the speed is very fast, the editor is very professional and enthusiastic, and the submission difficulty is moderate.The marine environment can be submitted.

(0) Thank | sea env

EditVery good, very polite and modest, very fast, recommend this journal

(0) Thank | xuxu

I have received your paper which you submitted to MPB. I regret, however, that we will not be able to publish it.

(14) Thank | ·

Review time is long, sorry to be rejected.The opinions of the experts have helped a lot in revising the paper.

(1) Thank | haiyang

Submitted the review comments and overhauled 4 months after submission.Expert opinions are very pertinent. After the revision, I feel that the quality of the article has improved.But unfortunately, I still refused to draft.I feel that the editor of the journal is very responsible and the comments are helpful.Although I refused the manuscript, it will definitely be good for my future articles.

(3) Thank | ztu1237

Reviewing speed is quite slow, and it took 3 months from submission to reviewing and reviewing.The questions raised by the reviewers are very professional, and some grammatical errors in the articles give detailed revisions.This is the first time I selectd for SCI. I didn't think that the chances were small. I didn't expect the review comments to be minor repairs. I received it one week after the repair, and I was online for half a month.It feels like not discriminating against Chinese people like some journals.The impact factor is medium in the environmental sciences, and it should be a good choice if you are a man of practice.

(13) Thank | xiaolong1988_@126.com

The review speed is very fast, and the editing efficiency is very high. From submission to receiving for more than two months, it is worth posting.

(1) Thank | ljning0402@163.com

The review speed is very fast, and the editing efficiency is very high. From submission to receiving for more than two months, it is worth posting

(0) Thank | ljning0402@163.com

my under review for more than a month, no results yet.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

occupied the position and other results

(0) Thank | Anonymous

submitted an article, from the time of submitteding to returning comments for one month, returning comments for minor repair, received after the repair.It lasted 2 months.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

The first English SCI, received the review comments in one month, the editors agreed to accept the changes, the same is very grateful, the editor found someone to give me the article polished English, very good journalSpeed ​​is very powerful in all aspects!

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Returned after two months"accept subject to revision", the editor gave a long modification time, half a year, maybe the current journals are all piled up, and the editors are not in a hurry.In fact, there are not many problems, but for personal reasons, it took two months to repair.Received after half a month of repair.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Recently I got an article, from submission to online for a month, I am grateful that the editor said that my English is not good, but also recruited me to polish it.

(0) Thank | Anonymous