Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | MAR POLLUT BULL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0025-326X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1879-3363 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 147 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 18.90% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/400/description#description | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/MPB | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Environmental Science | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Monthly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1970 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 772 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0025-326X%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 3.0 month(s) Data from Elsevier: Average 12.2 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 75% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Article Publication Time | Data from Elsevier: Average 10.9 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 2 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN: | Write a review |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-09-17 20:10:00 The process took about 5-6 months from submission to publication. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 芊芊芦苇 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-09-17 20:50:02 To promote everyone for me, I share the experience of submission for everyone, and I was rejected 3 months after submission. Reasons, directions do not match ![]() ![]() |
Author: Amy Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-07-03 09:06:56 The editorial attitude is particularly good. Sending two emails will be processed immediately after the reminder.A good journal, the impact factor is rising year by year.Due to the reason of the intermediate reviewer, the progress of the submission is a bit long, but there are other people in the lab who will return soon after the select, and the editing process is very efficient. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 李欣 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-07-01 15:26:25 04/apr/2017 submit15/apr/2017 send for review22/june/2017 major revision Super overhaul, four reviewers, and the wording is also very sharp..It is very troublesome to modify, and I plan to switch to it.After browsing, the Chinese articles in this journal are not high in proportion, and the requirements for language and data are very high. ![]() ![]() |
Author: laji Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-02-01 15:56:04 大水刊 This can count 1 district laugh dead people garbage ![]() ![]() |
Author: hhh Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-11-13 10:55:14 Environmental field 3 District Dashui published the heat of water biology became top really ![]() ![]() |
Author: leegaa Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-10-15 11:03:02 has been submitted for one and a half months and is still under review.Submitted for review one week after submission.The official website shows an average speed of 1 month in the first trial. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 小熊猫 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-09-03 13:43:02 has selectd for 10 days or with editor, I don't know how long it will take to review the manuscript.Do you want to review the draft fee? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 小熊猫 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-09-03 13:42:57 has selectd for 10 days or with editor, I don’t know how long it will take to review the manuscript.Do you want to review the draft fee? ![]() ![]() |
Author: JTA Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-11-29 17:23:46 Let me share it.In our laboratory for nearly 5 years, we have submited in about 8 articles in the journal.Four of them were rejected.2 articles were around 1 week and were rejected by the editor because they did not match the theme.The remaining two were rejected after the review.The fastest article, reviewed for 46 days.The remaining five articles, the initial review time are: 3 months, 4 months, 2 months, 5 months and 7 months.Overall, the review of this journal is not fast.It is not very suitable for students who want to graduate.But the editor's attitude is good, this is the advantage. ![]() ![]() |
Author: bznq Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-11-16 16:34:43 review for four months, minor repair, repair 10 days to accept ![]() ![]() |
Author: sea env Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-08-30 15:47:53 sent 2 articles, submitted in July, received minor repair opinions in August, accepted at the end of August, the speed is very fast, the editor is very professional and enthusiastic, and the submission difficulty is moderate.The marine environment can be submitted. ![]() ![]() |
Author: xuxu Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-04-27 17:03:34 EditVery good, very polite and modest, very fast, recommend this journal ![]() ![]() |
Author: · Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-12-04 19:47:22 I have received your paper which you submitted to MPB. I regret, however, that we will not be able to publish it. ![]() ![]() |
Author: haiyang Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-12-01 08:26:32 Review time is long, sorry to be rejected.The opinions of the experts have helped a lot in revising the paper. ![]() ![]() |
Author: ztu1237 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-05-11 13:52:21 Submitted the review comments and overhauled 4 months after submission.Expert opinions are very pertinent. After the revision, I feel that the quality of the article has improved.But unfortunately, I still refused to draft.I feel that the editor of the journal is very responsible and the comments are helpful.Although I refused the manuscript, it will definitely be good for my future articles. ![]() ![]() |
Author: xiaolong1988_@126.com Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-04-04 22:03:20 Reviewing speed is quite slow, and it took 3 months from submission to reviewing and reviewing.The questions raised by the reviewers are very professional, and some grammatical errors in the articles give detailed revisions.This is the first time I selectd for SCI. I didn't think that the chances were small. I didn't expect the review comments to be minor repairs. I received it one week after the repair, and I was online for half a month.It feels like not discriminating against Chinese people like some journals.The impact factor is medium in the environmental sciences, and it should be a good choice if you are a man of practice. ![]() ![]() |
Author: ljning0402@163.com Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2014-11-10 16:32:13 The review speed is very fast, and the editing efficiency is very high. From submission to receiving for more than two months, it is worth posting. ![]() ![]() |
Author: ljning0402@163.com Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2014-11-10 16:32:07 The review speed is very fast, and the editing efficiency is very high. From submission to receiving for more than two months, it is worth posting ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-04-25 09:56:00 my under review for more than a month, no results yet. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-03-21 16:18:00 occupied the position and other results ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-03-09 00:37:00 submitted an article, from the time of submitteding to returning comments for one month, returning comments for minor repair, received after the repair.It lasted 2 months. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-10-31 19:39:00 The first English SCI, received the review comments in one month, the editors agreed to accept the changes, the same is very grateful, the editor found someone to give me the article polished English, very good journalSpeed is very powerful in all aspects! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-09-08 17:01:00 Returned after two months"accept subject to revision", the editor gave a long modification time, half a year, maybe the current journals are all piled up, and the editors are not in a hurry.In fact, there are not many problems, but for personal reasons, it took two months to repair.Received after half a month of repair. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-11-17 19:18:00 Recently I got an article, from submission to online for a month, I am grateful that the editor said that my English is not good, but also recruited me to polish it. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 Next Last (To Page |