JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY

Several months for review. Overall, the speed of review is very fast, the editor and the two reviewers were very nice, and the opinions given were also very objective. Highly efficient.

(0) Thank | 769306713@qq.com

is almost three months old, still in the hands of the editor, what is the situation?

(3) Thank | thfn

almost three months, stillWhat is the situation in the editor?

(0) Thank | thfn

Reviewing is very fast, it took a month, but regret tragedy.Two reviewers, one comment is very detailed, the other one does not understand how to understand the article, just a random comment.

(1) Thank | xusss01

5 Month, overhaul in July, rehabilitated on September 8th, accepted on September 15.

(2) Thank | hyjzy

Reviewing is still very fast, the first overhaul, made a lot of comments, after a reply, the first is Reviewer Invited, but received directly after one week.Maybe it’s luck.But this journal is very application-oriented.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

The first trial is not fast, submitted in January, minor notice in May, but soon after the revisionI received it, and I feel quite lucky.The main activity is the biological activity of a component in algae, from isolation and purification to animal experiments.

(1) Thank | 喵

is very fast, 2 weeks to review the comments, and then raised some small questions, let the English strengthen, gave 4 weeks of minor repair time!Based on the advice received, I have decided that your manuscript can be accepted for publication after you have carried out the corrections as suggested by the reviewer(s).

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review speed of the journal is still relatively fast. After the first trial, it may be that the two reviewers have different opinions. Once again, the review is rejected, but the editor only gave a review.People's opinions, avoiding the main contribution of the article, and mentioning some unrelated issues. In general, their articles have certain flaws. I hope that next time good luck

(0) Thank | Anonymous

thisThe speed of the journal is quite strong, but the editors who helped me find the reviewer too, and raised a lot of completely irrelevant questions. Some of them are really common sense. He still asks, it is speechless.And the English level is really invincible than I am, but the speed may be my luck. Now I have already selectd for a higher number of journals.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

In addition to commercial applications, related to algaeBasic research will also be received.The reviewer is very objective and the editing efficiency is also very high. I gave advice for two months, and the overhaul was returned one month later.The overall feel is good, the format requirements are still relatively strict.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is mainly focused on research with commercial value algae, with higher language requirements, and the first-instance cycle is about 6 weeks.

(0) Thank | Anonymous