BMC PLANT BIOLOGY

This journal editor was very responsible (very troublesome). Submission on February 19, technical check for 3 days, and then the editorial assessment. On March 1, it was returned, the editor asked two small questions, one was that one of pictures needed to be changed, and the other was that the declaration was incomplete; I submitted it again after the correction; on March 12 it was returned again, and the editor raised 7 questions, believing that the article had design flaws, gave recommendation of major revisions, and requested that it should be resubmitted within two weeks. Being affected by the epidemic, I applied for an extension of two weeks and revised it one by one according to the revised comments; on March 30 I revised and resubmitted it. It was returned again on April 1, saying that there was a minor problem in the format that the email address of the corresponding author on the manuscript was inconsistent with the system, which was requested to be the same. I revised and resubmitted it; on April 2, it was returned again, saying that the format was a little wrong, and the wording in the declaration did not match journal requirement, which needed modification. I modified and resubmitted it. That’s irrational. Why didn't he ask all the questions at once, instead of asking separately? It wasted a lot of time.

(4) Thank | rocky

The review period is somewhat slow, and the fees associated with this journal are expensive compared to others.

(3) Thank | 2008202040104@whu.edu.cn

Reviewing speed is very fast, from submissionIt took less than three months to go online.Since our manuscripts have been submitted to other journals for review and supplements, the language has also been edited and revised, submitted on 2017-9-18, and returned to review for less than 3 weeks-minor revised;10-29The revised draft was submitted on the day of the month and accepted at the end of November. Due to the failure of the school’s financial account, it was delayed for a few days and officially opened in early December.Overall, this journal paper is quite good, the editor is more responsible, fast, worth recommending

(1) Thank | Anonymous

editor assigned a week has not moved

(0) Thank | nkxchenlin@163.com

early February this yearSubmission.About the bioinformatics section~ Submitted for about 20 days, the first-instance editor returned: There were not many problems, the editor was very careful, and many grammar questions were picked out; the details were also very noticeable.Repaired after one month of modification.The second trial time was relatively short, only took half a month, and there was not much problem in coming back.Said to modify the unit.Return to receive it after 3 days.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted for 2 months, there is no reply, rejected

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The overall article of this journal is very good. It has a high reputation in botany and related fields such as horticulture and agronomy, and the impact factor is also good.What's more important is that if the submission is not suitable, the editor will not submit the review directly, saving the time of the contributor. If the general review is sent for about 2 months, it can be accepted from the submission to the final acceptance for about 5 months.So in general it is a good journal.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

This is an open journal, the impact factor is OK, the review speed is a bit slow, but the acceptance is still online, very fast, the language requirements are relatively high, and the picture quality requirementsNot very good.The fees are more expensive, the best chart is a little more, can not seem too simple; two years of bioinformatics analysis, transcription and sequencing, etc. more articles;

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcplantbiol/

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Some articles are good, but there are also rubbish articles, the impact factor can also be

(0) Thank | Anonymous