| Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Title | BMC PLANT BIOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||
| Journal Title Abbreviations | BMC PLANT BIOL | ||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 1471-2229 | ||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 95 | ||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 7.20% | ||||||||||||||||
| Official Website | http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcplantbiol/ | ||||||||||||||||
| Online Manuscript Submission | http://www.biomedcentral.com/manuscript/bmcplantbiol | ||||||||||||||||
| Open Access | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
| Publisher | BIOMED CENTRAL LTD, 236 GRAYS INN RD, FLOOR 6, LONDON, ENGLAND, WC1X 8HL | ||||||||||||||||
| Subject Area | Biology | ||||||||||||||||
| Country/Area of Publication | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||
| Publication Frequency | Monthly | ||||||||||||||||
| Year Publication Started | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
| Annual Article Volume | 594 | ||||||||||||||||
| Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
| Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1471-2229%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
| Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 4.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||
| Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 50% | ||||||||||||||||
| Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||
| *All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |
| First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
| Reviews on BMC PLANT BIOLOGY: | Write a review |
| Author: 2008202040104@whu.edu.cn Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-01-07 13:27:20 The review period is somewhat slow, and the fees associated with this journal are expensive compared to others.  (3) Thank | 2008202040104@whu.edu.cn  |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-06-27 18:30:33 Reviewing speed is very fast, from submissionIt took less than three months to go online.Since our manuscripts have been submitted to other journals for review and supplements, the language has also been edited and revised, submitted on 2017-9-18, and returned to review for less than 3 weeks-minor revised;10-29The revised draft was submitted on the day of the month and accepted at the end of November. Due to the failure of the school’s financial account, it was delayed for a few days and officially opened in early December.Overall, this journal paper is quite good, the editor is more responsible, fast, worth recommending (1) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: nkxchenlin@163.com Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-10-27 22:41:55 editor assigned a week has not moved (0) Thank | nkxchenlin@163.com |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-04-25 19:29:00 early February this yearSubmission.About the bioinformatics section~ Submitted for about 20 days, the first-instance editor returned: There were not many problems, the editor was very careful, and many grammar questions were picked out; the details were also very noticeable.Repaired after one month of modification.The second trial time was relatively short, only took half a month, and there was not much problem in coming back.Said to modify the unit.Return to receive it after 3 days. (0) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-12-09 16:05:00 Submitted for 2 months, there is no reply, rejected (0) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-05-25 03:40:00 The overall article of this journal is very good. It has a high reputation in botany and related fields such as horticulture and agronomy, and the impact factor is also good.What's more important is that if the submission is not suitable, the editor will not submit the review directly, saving the time of the contributor. If the general review is sent for about 2 months, it can be accepted from the submission to the final acceptance for about 5 months.So in general it is a good journal. (1) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-05-05 10:53:00 This is an open journal, the impact factor is OK, the review speed is a bit slow, but the acceptance is still online, very fast, the language requirements are relatively high, and the picture quality requirementsNot very good.The fees are more expensive, the best chart is a little more, can not seem too simple; two years of bioinformatics analysis, transcription and sequencing, etc. more articles; (0) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-08-19 10:38:00 Journal Homepage URL: http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcplantbiol/ (0) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-07-11 11:48:00 Some articles are good, but there are also rubbish articles, the impact factor can also be (0) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-11-12 08:41:00 (0) Thank | Anonymous |
| First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |