My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT]Hello, you are Visitor Number 63870 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Journal Title AbbreviationsPLANT CELL ENVIRON
ISSN0140-7791
E-ISSN1365-3040
h-index176
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
11.102.7391.891
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Physiology
Q114 / 172
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Plant Science
Q111 / 431

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)4.80%
Official Websitehttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-3040
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/pce
Open AccessNo
PublisherWILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC, COMMERCE PLACE, 350 MAIN ST, MALDEN, USA, MA, 02148
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1978
Annual Article Volume218
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0140-7791%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Difficult
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-13 17:00:20
This journal’s EIC is very responsible. The entire process was 31 days. The reviewers were very professional, but the requirements may be easier than PP. In addition, refusing and encouraging re-submission is similar to other journals.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: calvo


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-15 10:30:43
Two months from the time of submission to receiving a share, the review comments will be returned one month after the submission.No need to make up the test, just raised a lot of questions, asking 28 days to answer all the questions.On the 27th afternoon, the comments were returned, and the article was accepted three days later.Overall, the review time is relatively short.Finally, I wish the research dogs a smooth experiment and graduate soon!!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | calvo

Author: 253860142@qq.com


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-19 01:31:18
The submission process was very difficult. After two "rejection re-submissions" and one "small repair", it was finally accepted.As far as I know, this journal does not have the option of "overhaul". It may have been there before, but I learned in the email from the assistant editor that there is no option for overhaul.Every review is actually very fast, with an average of 1-2 months, but it has been delayed for a long time because of the change of the tutor every time, so it will be accepted from September 2017 and will be accepted in August 2018.It has been going through a whole year.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 253860142@qq.com

Author: 1093476429@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-26 13:30:12
First refused to make a heavy shot, and then accepted it after 1 major overhaul.Very good journal, fortunate to be able to get one.
Show Review in Original Language
(20) Thank | 1093476429@qq.com

Author: 1093476429@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-26 13:30:03
refuses to make a heavy shot first, and then accepts it after 1 overhaul and 1 minor repair.Very good journal, fortunate to be able to get one.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | 1093476429@qq.com

Author: bioxf


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-14 10:48:42
2Submission No.9, February 13th under reivew, March 6th pending recommendation, March 7th under review, the current result is unknown.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | bioxf

Author: 小蜻蜓


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-02 02:55:25
has been submitted for more than two months, and is still under review... A little nervous, check the status every day, I hope there is good news.I have submited in an article in 15 years and received it in less than a month.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 小蜻蜓

Author: hali


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-24 21:55:33
1 month later minor revision, one-week re-submitment, accepted in 3 days.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | hali

Author: hali


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-08 19:37:56
more than a month, still under review, so slow!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | hali

Author: EP


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-23 07:35:44
Get review comments within three months.Published online for four months.The review cycle is fast.The review comments are very professional.I am Lin Xuekou.I feel that the article in this forest model is worthy of the journal of Lin Xuekou.So I chose this.The evaluations of the two reviewers obtained were all very positive.But a reviewer said that your model has never been published in this journal.The editor said that the forest model article we also sent, such as a certain model is the first to be sent here.Received after minor repairs.After a few years, I checked the current citation rate, and my article was probably the second lowest in that period.There is no way, after all, what is done is more partial.I also worked as their reviewer.It is required to complete the review in three months.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | EP

Author: 小蛤蜊


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-25 08:25:33
was submitted on December 3, 2016, and the revised opinion was received on January 8, 2017. The change was returned on February 19 and accepted on February 24.Very fast journal
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 小蛤蜊

Author: xxxx


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-05-25 03:04:19
3月13#SubmissionMarch 14 under reviewMay 5th pending recommendationMay 22, send a letter to the editorPending decision on May 24 and received the result:A reviewer said that the experiment was done very well, the article was written very systematically, and it was suggested that the minor was accepted; one reviewer said that the experiment was done well, but the new idea did not meet the journal standard; the associate edtior agreed to the second review.The commentary of the manuscript, the editor-in-chief finally rejected the manuscript and did not encourage re-submitment.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | xxxx

Author: 823532524@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-05-20 17:05:18
After the external audit result came back, the pending recommendation was 15 days, and the status remained unchanged.Does anyone know what is going on?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 823532524@qq.com

Author: 000


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-05-12 16:18:09
8 weeks of external trial, pending recommendation There is still no result in this week, this rhythm...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 000

Author: xxxx


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-20 19:12:45
said that this journal is fast, one month to the news, the next day the submission is under review, but after six weeks, there is still no first-instance result, there is a classmate who knows, this is an embarrassing situation.?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | xxxx

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-04 10:59:00
The review speed is very fast, and the message was given in January
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-14 12:07:00
This review is very slow, submitted eight months ago, and the two rounds of minor repairs accepted.I feel that the editor is very responsible.Under normal circumstances, the review is very fast, probably my direction is relatively small, the reviewer is not easy to find
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-15 08:30:00
review speed is very fast, editing services are efficient, can be rejected
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-17 18:22:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-03 14:23:00
, the review comments will be given about one month after the submission, and will be received the next day after the minor repair.You can check the various status of the article online, the review efficiency is very high, the result is given after one month, there is no layout fee, but the color map fee.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-14 16:06:00
First month of trial, received two days after the minor repair, the efficiency is quite high.Before entering the judging stage, the editor will first check the review to see if it is suitable for publication in the publication.One of my brother's articles was rejected three or four days after the select, and did not enter the judging stage.If you enter the review stage, the editor is optimistic about your article.The reviewer should recommend it himself and find a counterpart who compares the cow. Once it is recognized, the success will not be far away. Even if it is not, it will provide revision opinions, which will facilitate the revision of the article.There is no review fee and layout fee for the article, but the color map is charged, the first color map is free, and the second one costs £50 each.I wish you all success.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-28 11:48:00
Plants are relatively unpopular, but the requirements are also very high, now IF5 points more.The range of feelings is relatively narrow, and it is recommended to check on the website to see if it is suitable for the journal.Experience rejection and encourage re-submitment - minor repair - minor repair - finally received.Really feel that it is not easy.Before the review was 6 weeks, after the small repair, the second day of the opinion came back quite quickly!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-18 22:03:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-3040
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 植物基因图谱
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-03-02 04:18:00
Preliminary review is fastThe same day, the next day, the feedback will be sent back to the author in the next day, which is suitable for publication in this publication.The threshold is a bit high.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service