My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

NEW PHYTOLOGIST

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[NEW PHYTOLOGIST]Hello, you are Visitor Number 78578 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleNEW PHYTOLOGIST
Journal Title AbbreviationsNEW PHYTOL
ISSN0028-646X
E-ISSN1469-8137
h-index210
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
13.003.7022.282
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Plant Science
Q19 / 431
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Physiology
Q18 / 172

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)7.30%
Official Websitehttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1469-8137
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/newphytologist
Open AccessNo
PublisherWILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC, COMMERCE PLACE, 350 MAIN ST, MALDEN, USA, MA, 02148
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1902
Annual Article Volume595
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0028-646X%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 25%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【NEW PHYTOLOGIST】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on NEW PHYTOLOGIST: Write a review
Author: lovealgae


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-05 18:49:18
I received the reviewers’ comments after about a month and addressed their concerns. It took about 3 months for the review process. The reviewers and editors are very responsible, and the questions they raised were very professional. If there are experiments that cannot be completed, they should be explained in detail. The editor gave direct acceptance according to the reviewer’s opinion.

(3) Thank | lovealgae

Author: jean_valjean


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-11 21:49:13
I am lucky, reviewing the draft for 24 days, then one reviewer has raised several questions that need to be supplemented, and the other thinks that it can be received directly. Finally, the deputy editor agrees to make upThe experiment, the comments were also very positive, and finally let the overhaul, 2 months.Due to objective reasons, I asked for more than one month of extension, then submitted the amendment, submitted in the morning, and the editor in the afternoon sent a letter saying that receiving, it was amazing, haha.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | jean_valjean

Author: hlk


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-17 17:54:56
Submitted for 20 days, in the review, I am uneasy.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | hlk

Author: 2018


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-17 21:41:49
After reviewing the draft for two months, I am still waiting for the review report and praying...
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 2018

Author: 明明


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-28 14:55:10
I just dropped an article today, ecological, and praying..
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 明明

Author: ****


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-24 21:30:07
claims to give the results of the first trial within 28 days, the manuscript is thrown out the next dayAfter the trial, the results have passed more than 10 weeks and there is still no first-instance result...
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | ****

Author: wznn


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-15 03:07:55
Classic journal, but the impact factor has been surpassed by Mol Plant, and its status has declined. However, the quality of the article is still good. The latest impact factor foresubmitted is maintained at 6 or above, and it is difficult to surpass 7.If you like plant science, you can pay attention to the "Forefront of Plant Science" WeChat public number, search: frontiersin.The second one is more fortunate. Every week, I reviewed the manuscript and I was very online. I have been occupying the highest reading list in 30 days.I hope everyone will contribute in 2017!!!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | wznn

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-19 09:24:48
I am doing plant pathology, sequencing of fungal genomes.The overall feeling: 1, the journal is very good, the editor is responsible, the reviewer is also looking for professional; 2, the review speed is very fast, the round of review is basically within 1 month.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: zrhu


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-05-07 10:08:03
The very good journal in the field of botany has already surpassed Plant J and plant Phy, and the momentum is almost equal to plant cell
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | zrhu

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-09 08:30:00
requirements are very high, very slow, not worth submiting
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-19 16:25:00
New Phytologist (NP) is a century-old comprehensive botany journal (1902)The publication, journal history can be found at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/pdf/nph.pdf), similar to the American authoritative aquaculture journal Amerian Journal of Botany.Before the millennium, this journal had been arrogant. Later, from the editor-in-chief to the executive editor, a set of people was replaced, and then the influence factor went up.Starting in 2012, the journal no longer publishes a paper version, and also launched the Online Open option, which means the author can choose to pay for Open Access.In short,
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-19 14:07:00
review is still relatively fast, editor, reviewer's opinions are very pertinent, there are levels.No discrimination and prejudice, not bad.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-03 03:23:00
Reviewing is not too fast. From receive to accept time, there are very few more than 3 months of submission. It only takes a week to receive it.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-18 04:19:00
is a good journal, mainly because of the high impact factor. In the field of plant physiology, I personally think that there is no plant cell & environment.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-12 15:40:00
The journal is really fast enough to review the paper for 30 days in the first instance and 8 days in the second instance.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-18 19:56:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1469-8137
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-20 19:14:00
Super hard to select, requires experimentThere is a lot of data, and the experimental means are rich in content.Personally think that sometimes it is harder to select than plant physiology, the lab has a brother and sister to plant this journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-04-19 22:20:00
The journal guarantees that the review time is within 2 months, and the impact factor has exceeded the GCB, and the global change research content can also be selectively published.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 植物生理
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-29 16:53:00
First trial is faster, 2-4 weeks
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [NEW PHYTOLOGIST]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service