NEW PHYTOLOGIST

I used to have feelings for this journal. When the first submission was made in 2009, although the article was rejected, the editor-in-chief still sent me a bound volume of that year and an email, which is still there today. Although I changed my direction and never submitted to this journal again, my impression of this journal is still very good.

(12) Thank | ust

It is a good journal in botany, I personally think it is equivalent to Plant Physiology. The review speed is fast, the selected experts are professional, and the innovation is emphasized. Submission, 21-May-2019; Rejected with resubmitting encourage, 03-Jun-2019; Resubmission, 04-Jun-2019; Major revision advised, 03-Jul-2019; Accepted subject to revision, 16-Aug-2019; Accepted as submitted, 24-Aug-2019.

(5) Thank | neme

First submission: 2018.6.27 submit; 7.03 under review; 7.27 wait decision; 8.2. reject with resubmitting encourage. Second submission: 2019.1.24 resubmit; 1.27 under review; 3.3. wait for decision; 3.8 accept with revision (revision should be finished in six weeks). Third submission: 2019.4.20 resubmit; 4.22 wait decision; 4.27 accept.

(8) Thank | yl1904

I received the reviewers’ comments after about a month and addressed their concerns. It took about 3 months for the review process. The reviewers and editors are very responsible, and the questions they raised were very professional. If there are experiments that cannot be completed, they should be explained in detail. The editor gave direct acceptance according to the reviewer’s opinion.

(3) Thank | lovealgae

I am lucky, reviewing the draft for 24 days, then one reviewer has raised several questions that need to be supplemented, and the other thinks that it can be received directly. Finally, the deputy editor agrees to make upThe experiment, the comments were also very positive, and finally let the overhaul, 2 months.Due to objective reasons, I asked for more than one month of extension, then submitted the amendment, submitted in the morning, and the editor in the afternoon sent a letter saying that receiving, it was amazing, haha.

(2) Thank | jean_valjean

Submitted for 20 days, in the review, I am uneasy.

(0) Thank | hlk

After reviewing the draft for two months, I am still waiting for the review report and praying...

(1) Thank | 2018

I just dropped an article today, ecological, and praying..

(5) Thank | 明明

claims to give the results of the first trial within 28 days, the manuscript is thrown out the next dayAfter the trial, the results have passed more than 10 weeks and there is still no first-instance result...

(3) Thank | ****

Classic journal, but the impact factor has been surpassed by Mol Plant, and its status has declined. However, the quality of the article is still good. The latest impact factor foresubmitted is maintained at 6 or above, and it is difficult to surpass 7.If you like plant science, you can pay attention to the "Forefront of Plant Science" WeChat public number, search: frontiersin.The second one is more fortunate. Every week, I reviewed the manuscript and I was very online. I have been occupying the highest reading list in 30 days.I hope everyone will contribute in 2017!!!

(2) Thank | wznn

I am doing plant pathology, sequencing of fungal genomes.The overall feeling: 1, the journal is very good, the editor is responsible, the reviewer is also looking for professional; 2, the review speed is very fast, the round of review is basically within 1 month.

(5) Thank | Anonymous

The very good journal in the field of botany has already surpassed Plant J and plant Phy, and the momentum is almost equal to plant cell

(5) Thank | zrhu

requirements are very high, very slow, not worth submiting

(0) Thank | Anonymous

New Phytologist (NP) is a century-old comprehensive botany journal (1902)The publication, journal history can be found at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/pdf/nph.pdf), similar to the American authoritative aquaculture journal Amerian Journal of Botany.Before the millennium, this journal had been arrogant. Later, from the editor-in-chief to the executive editor, a set of people was replaced, and then the influence factor went up.Starting in 2012, the journal no longer publishes a paper version, and also launched the Online Open option, which means the author can choose to pay for Open Access.In short,

(2) Thank | Anonymous

review is still relatively fast, editor, reviewer's opinions are very pertinent, there are levels.No discrimination and prejudice, not bad.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Reviewing is not too fast. From receive to accept time, there are very few more than 3 months of submission. It only takes a week to receive it.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

is a good journal, mainly because of the high impact factor. In the field of plant physiology, I personally think that there is no plant cell & environment.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

The journal is really fast enough to review the paper for 30 days in the first instance and 8 days in the second instance.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1469-8137

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Super hard to select, requires experimentThere is a lot of data, and the experimental means are rich in content.Personally think that sometimes it is harder to select than plant physiology, the lab has a brother and sister to plant this journal.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The journal guarantees that the review time is within 2 months, and the impact factor has exceeded the GCB, and the global change research content can also be selectively published.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

First trial is faster, 2-4 weeks

(0) Thank | Anonymous