Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | NEW PHYTOLOGIST | ||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | NEW PHYTOL | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0028-646X | ||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1469-8137 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 210 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 7.30% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1469-8137 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/newphytologist | ||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC, COMMERCE PLACE, 350 MAIN ST, MALDEN, USA, MA, 02148 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Biology | ||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Semimonthly | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1902 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 595 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0028-646X%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 1.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 25% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on NEW PHYTOLOGIST: | Write a review |
Author: lovealgae Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-12-05 18:49:18 I received the reviewers’ comments after about a month and addressed their concerns. It took about 3 months for the review process. The reviewers and editors are very responsible, and the questions they raised were very professional. If there are experiments that cannot be completed, they should be explained in detail. The editor gave direct acceptance according to the reviewer’s opinion. ![]() ![]() |
Author: jean_valjean Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-11-11 21:49:13 I am lucky, reviewing the draft for 24 days, then one reviewer has raised several questions that need to be supplemented, and the other thinks that it can be received directly. Finally, the deputy editor agrees to make upThe experiment, the comments were also very positive, and finally let the overhaul, 2 months.Due to objective reasons, I asked for more than one month of extension, then submitted the amendment, submitted in the morning, and the editor in the afternoon sent a letter saying that receiving, it was amazing, haha. ![]() ![]() |
Author: hlk Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-09-17 17:54:56 Submitted for 20 days, in the review, I am uneasy. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 2018 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-01-17 21:41:49 After reviewing the draft for two months, I am still waiting for the review report and praying... ![]() ![]() |
Author: 明明 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-06-28 14:55:10 I just dropped an article today, ecological, and praying.. ![]() ![]() |
Author: **** Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-04-24 21:30:07 claims to give the results of the first trial within 28 days, the manuscript is thrown out the next dayAfter the trial, the results have passed more than 10 weeks and there is still no first-instance result... ![]() ![]() |
Author: wznn Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-03-15 03:07:55 Classic journal, but the impact factor has been surpassed by Mol Plant, and its status has declined. However, the quality of the article is still good. The latest impact factor foresubmitted is maintained at 6 or above, and it is difficult to surpass 7.If you like plant science, you can pay attention to the "Forefront of Plant Science" WeChat public number, search: frontiersin.The second one is more fortunate. Every week, I reviewed the manuscript and I was very online. I have been occupying the highest reading list in 30 days.I hope everyone will contribute in 2017!!! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-08-19 09:24:48 I am doing plant pathology, sequencing of fungal genomes.The overall feeling: 1, the journal is very good, the editor is responsible, the reviewer is also looking for professional; 2, the review speed is very fast, the round of review is basically within 1 month. ![]() ![]() |
Author: zrhu Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2014-05-07 10:08:03 The very good journal in the field of botany has already surpassed Plant J and plant Phy, and the momentum is almost equal to plant cell ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-10-09 08:30:00 requirements are very high, very slow, not worth submiting ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-06-19 16:25:00 New Phytologist (NP) is a century-old comprehensive botany journal (1902)The publication, journal history can be found at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/pdf/nph.pdf), similar to the American authoritative aquaculture journal Amerian Journal of Botany.Before the millennium, this journal had been arrogant. Later, from the editor-in-chief to the executive editor, a set of people was replaced, and then the influence factor went up.Starting in 2012, the journal no longer publishes a paper version, and also launched the Online Open option, which means the author can choose to pay for Open Access.In short, ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-03-19 14:07:00 review is still relatively fast, editor, reviewer's opinions are very pertinent, there are levels.No discrimination and prejudice, not bad. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-11-03 03:23:00 Reviewing is not too fast. From receive to accept time, there are very few more than 3 months of submission. It only takes a week to receive it. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-10-18 04:19:00 is a good journal, mainly because of the high impact factor. In the field of plant physiology, I personally think that there is no plant cell & environment. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-10-12 15:40:00 The journal is really fast enough to review the paper for 30 days in the first instance and 8 days in the second instance. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-08-18 19:56:00 Journal Homepage URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1469-8137 ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-05-20 19:14:00 Super hard to select, requires experimentThere is a lot of data, and the experimental means are rich in content.Personally think that sometimes it is harder to select than plant physiology, the lab has a brother and sister to plant this journal. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-04-19 22:20:00 The journal guarantees that the review time is within 2 months, and the impact factor has exceeded the GCB, and the global change research content can also be selectively published. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: 植物生理 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-07-29 16:53:00 First trial is faster, 2-4 weeks ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |