Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | J EXP BOT | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0022-0957 | ||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1460-2431 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 209 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 6.40% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://submit-jxb.oxfordjournals.org/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | OXFORD UNIV PRESS, GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX2 6DP | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Biology | ||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Monthly | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1950 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 466 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0022-0957%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 1.7 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 25% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY: | Write a review |
Author: wznn Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-03-15 03:03:38 I submitted once, and the manuscript was rejected in less than a month. I had better luck with my second submission. I quite like the journal. The editor is very serious. If you like plant science, you can follow the "Forefront of Plant Science." ![]() ![]() |
Author: 707145297@qq.com Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-07-11 17:54:56 The reviewer is very responsible, reviewing the draft quickly, overhauling it, and directly hiring it after minor repairs.Still very lucky to submitted the first draft.Ha ha...Go ahead, come on!Share it together: 725554986 ![]() ![]() |
Author: ljx Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-03-29 17:12:29 2017.11.30 contribution2017.12.07under peer review2018.01.08 under review2018.01.11revision-major The speed is quite fast, and Christmas is in the middle.Give 6 weeks2018.02.21 returned to repair2018.02.26 under peer review2018.03.12 revision-minor2018.03.22 Reworked back2018.03.26 acceptedThe above status is viewed from the Author Center's Submission History, and only the under review is shown in the Queue Summary. ![]() ![]() |
Author: ruanmengbin@itbb.org.cn Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-06-03 22:27:52 The first article went to the November 19th submission, which has been accepted, has been proof, and published within two weeks.The second article was submitted on April 7 this year and is still in peer review. ![]() ![]() |
Author: yanjiusuo Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-05-09 16:45:03 This journal has been in business for more than 50 days and there is no news yet.Have you had a preliminary review for more than 2 months? ![]() ![]() |
Author: cera Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-01-13 15:28:50 because the workload is relatively large, the title is relatively new, 27 days to review comments, receiveI have modified the language for one month, published ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-08-19 10:02:01 The first trial is really slow, from 2 months onwards, the revision is submitted for another month, and the submission from the submission to the acceptance status has been under review.I can write a letter reminder. I rushed it once in the first trial. After the repair, I urged it once and explained it patiently.However, after receiving it, it was very easy to see the journal soon. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-10-20 10:59:00 Add it, the submission before May 1st, one month and a half was rejected, encourage re-submitment, the experiment to be filled a little more ~ re-submitment before September, another one and a half months back, did not let meThe text was directly received by ~ ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-05-07 07:22:00 2, the first draft of the 6th, the minor repair on April 5th, and the reception on May 1st. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-06-20 07:13:00 Add another article, the first draft submitted on February 28, the review was used for almost two months, and on April 23, the review comments were received, and the review was revised on May 11. 5Accepted on the 14th. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-12-10 17:29:00 This journal is very good, the review is fast, generally there will be review opinions in a month or so, one in the first one, the first return is the re-submitment after the revision, the secondThe second time was minor repair, and the minor repair was accepted after returning.I was not so lucky to select for another article in this journal. The reviewer said that the depth is not enough, and the rejection is ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-08-18 21:02:00 Journal Homepage URL: http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/ ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-07-06 03:30:00 Reviewing is fast and slow, my article has been reviewed for three months and there is no news yet!The impact factor has risen year after year and should be one of the best journals for crop physiology. It is easier to compare with plant celll, environment and new phytologist. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-05-20 19:16:00 The review is fast, but the experimental data is required to be sufficient. In recent years, the impact factor has been rising, and the number of articles submitted has also increased sharply. Many people in our lab selectd for the first choice, soMore and more difficult to select in ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-04-05 16:44:00 just selectd at the end of last month to JXB personally feel that this journal is very promising to see the impact of the index rising momentum will know.I am thinking that if 2011 can reach 4.5, this possibility is still relatively large. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: 植物抗病性 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-12-21 11:00:00 From submission to receipt of Decision letter, it lasted 10 days a month, minor repair.Submit the revised draft two weeks later and receive it directly after one week. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: 分子Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-09-11 13:12:00 has selectd for one article. The preliminary review said that the depth of the article did not meet the requirements, and directly suggested to change the submitment. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-08-12 12:38:00 My first article, the first trial was smashed, and it took a week ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |