| Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Title | Waste and Biomass Valorization | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Journal Title Abbreviations | WASTE BIOMASS VALORI | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 1877-2641 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| E-ISSN | 1877-265X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 6.50% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Official Website | https://www.springer.com/journal/12649 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/WAVE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Open Access | Yes (Hybrid OA journal) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Publisher | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject Area | ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Country/Area of Publication | NETHERLANDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Publication Frequency | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year Publication Started | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Annual Article Volume | 341 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1877-2641%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
| First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
| Reviews on Waste and Biomass Valorization: | Write a review |
| Author: Hai Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-05-27 12:01:43 2016.8.3 Submission; Sept. 5 under review (first reviewer); Oct. 7 under review (second reviewer); Oct. 29 Major revision (one reviewer suggested major revision, the other suggested minor revision); 11.25 Revision; 11.30 under review (first reviewer); 12.4 under review (second reviewer); 12.25 Major revision (one reviewer suggested major revision, while the other suggested acceptance); 2017.1.8 Revision; Jan. 17 under review; Jan. 28 accepted. The first reviewer is persistent, insisted on revising some details. We eventually revised, I am very grateful to the reviewers' suggestions  (0) Thank | Hai  |
| Author: qiqi777 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-09-27 18:39:20 First trial or so for about two months, modified for about one month, about two months for the second trial, the middle editor made mistakes and did not upload the revised opinions, and came to a third trial, which was finally acceptd, from submission toReceived half a year time (2) Thank | qiqi777 |
| Author: lsx20131120a@163.com Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-10-01 10:54:10 I have not selectd but I have tried a first trial. I used the 5 days to overhaul the second trial. I used 7 days of minor repairs. But the article has been used for nearly 7 months from submission to reception. It seems that only one of my reviewers...... (0) Thank | lsx20131120a@163.com |
| First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |