Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

WATER RESEARCH

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[WATER RESEARCH]Hello, you are Visitor Number 155548 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleWATER RESEARCH
Journal Title AbbreviationsWATER RES
ISSN0043-1354
h-index263
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
8.552.7212.426
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Water Science and Technology
Q11 / 203
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Waste Management and Disposal
Q11 / 92
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Ecological Modelling
Q11 / 30
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
Q13 / 109

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)9.80%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/309/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/wr/
Open AccessNo
PublisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
Subject Area环境科学
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1967
Annual Article Volume840
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0043-1354%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 4.4 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 53%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 3 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【WATER RESEARCH】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on WATER RESEARCH: Write a review
Author: chocoring


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-18 13:16:34
There were two reviewers for the first round of review : one asked for major revision, the author suggested rejection with the possibility of re-submission. So the editor decided on rejection with the possibility of re-submission. I revised the paper and did new experiments according to the reviewer's comments. The manuscript was 40 pages long, but my responses to the reviewer comments were 50 pages long. Really should be thorough and careful, and do not ignore any comments unless there is a fundamental error. I re-submited and received the review comments after one and a half months. I got minor revision. The paper went back to the two original reviewers. The reviewer who previously asked for major revision accepted it, while the other reviewer asked for minor revision and gave three comments. After that round of revision, the paper was accepted the day after I resubmitted. The proof email was sent on the same day, and the paper was online the following day, so it is very efficient. As long as your work is novel, the data are solid, and you have a sincere attitude, plus a little luck, you will certainly be rewarded. I hope everyone can publish many papers!

(6) Thank | chocoring

Author: xuangood


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-07 17:33:56
Submitted on June 2ndJune 10, submitted for reviewOctober 15 minor repairOctober 19th BackAccepted on October 21This is the top journal in the field of environmental water treatment.Usually it is 2 months to give the result, but my luck is not good, dragging for four months, or coming back is a minor repair.Both reviewers are minor repairs and basically no problem.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | xuangood

Author: Felix_a


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-24 13:26:31
2018.06.15 submit;2018.08.01 major revision;2018.08.30 revised;2018.09.21 accepted.The two reviewers did not modify many opinions. The editor gave a major revision and made a large-scale revision of the manuscript. After the reorganization, the journal recommended that it be submitted to the first issue of Water Research X, but we insisted on WR, so we lost some time in the middle.And finally accepted.I hope to provide useful information to you and help.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Felix_a

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-14 20:00:51
Received 19 April 2018,Moderate rvision 4 July 2018,Revised 13 July 2018,Accepted 14 July 2018,Available online 19 July 2018Three reviewers, one of them suggested to redo in another way (too frivolous), and the other two gave a good opinion. The editor gave the middle repair, and returned directly after the return. Overall, the review speed is OK.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: zirandaode@zju.edu.cn


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-09 11:32:25
Reply to the 58th floor: WR and WRR belong to different fields, WR focuses on water environment and water treatment, WRR focuses on hydrology and water resources, both of which are the best journals in their respective fields..WR is a more popular environmental area, with a focus on chemical and biological processes with high impact factors.Of course, the fields are different, and it is not possible to simply compare the impact factors (for example, the four major journals in the field of pure mathematics, the impact factors are 4.768, 2.44, 2.767, and 4.625, respectively, but it is a great god).As far as I know, if you can post more than 7 first/communication author papers on WRR or WR, you can basically get a foothold in your field.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | zirandaode@zju.edu.cn

Author: wr


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-25 10:37:39
Reply to the 58th floor: Although the old beauty disdains wr, but the influence factor of wr is much higher than wrr
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | wr

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-15 19:48:18
2017.12.28 submit;2018.1.16 under review;2018.2.10 major revision;2018.3.5 receipt revision;2018.3.27 accept.The two reviewers, the review speed is still very fast, a minor repair, a major repair, the editor gave the overhaul, there is no big problem, the repair will accept.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 1


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-28 16:01:00
What is the better wr and wrr (water resources research)?
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 1

Author: 菲菲


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-12 22:08:07
2017.9.25 submit;2017.10.9 under review;2017.11.10 Moderate revision;2017.11.21 receipt revision;2017.11.30 acceptThere are a lot of submissions for water research, most of them are 1-2 months, and the review is very fast.However, the quality of the article is required to be high. After all, it is the top journal in the field of water treatment, and the reviewers are harsh.I am relatively lucky and gave it to the middle school.My article has three characteristics: 1. good idea, high innovation; 2. 1 year experiment, large amount of data; 3. The draft has changed 10 times, which takes 9 months.If these three characteristics are missing, my post is overhaul or rejection.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 菲菲

Author: xlhe1763960795@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-23 10:25:55
Speed ​​is very fast, editing efficiency is also high, three reviewers, two agreed to modify, the third person should be rejected, the editor gave the first repair, returned to repairThe latter two reviewers agreed to receive, and the third reviewer was also required to make changes. The comments were very pertinent. After the second return, I received it. I was so happy that I was doing the resistance gene.The revision process is also quite torturous. It is necessary to have patience. The journal has a high quality requirement for the article.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | xlhe1763960795@163.com

Author: yajure


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-19 21:12:28
A total of six months from submission to reception, overhaul twice, and repair once!In general, the requirements of the journal are relatively high, and the efficiency of editing needs to be improved!2016.10.23 Submit,10.24 Editor invited,10.25 Under review, 2017.1.11 with editor,Major revision2017.2.6 Revision submitted to journal, 2.7 Editor invited, 2.12 Editor assigned, 2.14 Under review, 2.27 with editor, 3.3 major revision, 3.14 Revision submitted to journal, Editor invited, 3.18 Editor assigned, 3.20 Under review, 4.7 with editor, 4.9Moderate revision, 4.19 Revision submitted to journal, Editor invited, 4.25 Accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | yajure

Author: feichen@hnu.edu.cn


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-07-14 21:59:57
has been shared for four months from submission to receiving. The editor is particularly good. I asked one in the middle. The editor patiently answered and explained the reason for the delay. I returned the moderate revise.A week editor directly received
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | feichen@hnu.edu.cn

Author: 我看行


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-10 11:01:15
Yesterday just submitted an article, look forward to good luck
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 我看行

Author: amuling


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-02-28 09:54:35
submitted on January 11th, received review comments on February 15th, moderation revision, revised draft on February 23, and acceptance notice on February 27.Luck is super good!
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | amuling

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-21 01:19:00
Water Treatment AreaThe top journal has recently received a notice of major revision for about 50 days, and the three reviewers have more professional opinions.However, browsing the journal online articles found that the overall length of time is generally more than 3 months.The article is mostly biased towards pollutant conversion technology and reaction mechanism.The content I submitted was the biofilm microbial community analysis of the pollutant conversion reactor.The article requirements are relatively high, compared to BT and JHM journal WR is hard to hit.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-12 13:08:00
9.4 submitted10.14 under review10.24 with editor11.11 rejected
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-22 08:35:00
Received review results three months after submission, three reviewersThere are quite a lot of opinions, and there are more than 30 pages of revising opinions.Then, around 20 days, I received Accept.The entire cycle is 4-5 months.Medium speed.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-23 16:17:00
WR Although it is very famous, some editors may be very nonsense.Rejected on the grounds of being restricted to a certain area, they were not sent for external trial.The problem is that many of the papers in the journal are also aimed at exploring some areas of the world. It is really speechless.In addition, as long as a certain area has characteristics and is not representative, is it worth studying?It seems that the human cattle is 拽
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-02 07:50:00
speed is super slow, the relationship is serious, the impact factor is falling!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-02 01:56:00
No.1 for water treatment, it is said that the rate of drafts in China is 99%.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-16 19:40:00
The speed of reviewing is OK, not slow, and the review comments are received within three months.The reviewers are very professional, very detailed and very serious, and have put forward a lot of ideas for the improvement of the article.The overall publication is good, and it is worthwhile for us to contribute to the water treatment!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-15 14:05:00
After three months of submission, the overhaul will be notified. After the revised manuscript is submitted for one and a half months, the minor repair will be notified, and the submission will be notified 20 days later.I feel that the reviewer has a lot of opinions and is very amateur, but fortunately, I have not waited too long and finally received it.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-15 20:52:00
Read the comments of the industry, I will say a few words.I was invited by the publication to be referee in 1994, when I was the only one in China to register as a reviewer.
Show Review in Original Language
(18) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-26 12:21:00
This journal is submitted for review and review is super slow and as long as there is a reviewer who disagrees basically no play, I feel that the editor is not very responsible, so please don't select for this journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-27 09:29:00
reviewed the draft for nearly 3 months, and the comments I came back made me speechless.The editor said that he has found 9 reviewers. No one can review it. It does not meet the scope of the journal. I suggest you select for other journals.... This is the first time I got this opinion
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [WATER RESEARCH]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*