The first submission was in June, and after four weeks, the overall comments of the three reviewers were positive. The editor gave a rejection and resubmit (two-month period). Revised, applied for a one-month extension; returned revisions in early October, received the results in early November. Only took 4 weeks. Reviewer 1 still has minor concerns, and reviewers 2 and 3 recommended acceptance. The newly added reviewer 4 gave some comments. Overall positive, and the return was made in mid-December and received directly after 5 days. Very good journal, quick review, strict editorial process, high peer recognition. Definitely a top journal and worth a try. Good luck!

(23) Thank | Anonymous

The editorial review time is 20 days, and the reviewer will be reminded at 14 days.

(0) Thank | xxx

望中#The quality of #

(0) Thank | 联盟SCI

, a little dizzy.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I have to edit the review draft first, and 40% of them are shot down in this session. My first Paper isIn this way, there is no trial at all.The second Paper is more fortunate, and it was sent to the trial. It is said that only 20% of the Papers submitted for review can be accepted. I am faster, and there are revision opinions in less than 2 months. The reviewers don’t have much advice.Modified directly after the change.I feel that the research content (direction) of the first paper must have obvious innovations. It is the Highlight we are talking about. It is better to use some statistical methods, such as PCA, mathematical models, etc., foreigners prefer this, and more explainproblem.I hope everyone will be lucky.

(14) Thank | guopeng.sci

The journal is very efficient, although it has been delayed for half a month, but the external trial is less than a month, then the editor returns only comments.It took 3 days.The external review was quite good, pointing out that the main problem was the expression (because the content of the paper was too much, it was easy to get lost), and then the editor gave a major overhaul.It took more than a month to revise, and after resubmission, a notice of acceptance was given in a week.It took more than three months to complete the front and back, and the manuscript was revised over a month.The reviewer is very responsible, the nail is riveting and riveting, and the opinions are very pertinent.The editor is also very good, I accidentally missed a file, sent an email in the past, and quickly made it for me.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is very demanding, about 3 months, it seems to be a little better than Ecology, the impact factor has passed 6, a good publication.At that time, I selectd for one, and a foreigner’s review comments were ok. The result was rejected by the Chinese compatriots and rejected.The reason is that many Chinese articles are not quoted.After rejecting the manuscript, switch to the new phytologist to receive it.This shows the difficulty of this publication.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

GCB has a target impact factor of 10 or more, so GCB requirements are almost demanding.Aditor may face five high-quality articles and can only accept one's pressure.Therefore, in addition to the innovation of research, the most basic language, journal requirements (image requirements, reference format...), language logic and other issues are extremely high.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

“ranked 3rd in the list of most-cited journals in Climate Change Research, 1999-2009(First and second places were Nature and Science respectively)." Industry recognition is high

(0) Thank | Anonymous