Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 54803 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleGLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsGLOBAL CHANGE BIOL
ISSN1354-1013
E-ISSN1365-2486
h-index217
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
9.144.3162.614
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Global and Planetary Change
Q12 / 75
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: General Environmental Science
Q13 / 192
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Ecology
Q14 / 336
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q14 / 100

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)7.90%
Official Websitehttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2486
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/gcb
Open AccessNo
PublisherWILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC, COMMERCE PLACE, 350 MAIN ST, MALDEN, USA, MA, 02148
Subject Area环境科学
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyBimonthly
Year Publication Started1995
Annual Article Volume491
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1354-1013%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.3 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 37.5%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-25 05:36:52
The first submission was in June, and after four weeks, the overall comments of the three reviewers were positive. The editor gave a rejection and resubmit (two-month period). Revised, applied for a one-month extension; returned revisions in early October, received the results in early November. Only took 4 weeks. Reviewer 1 still has minor concerns, and reviewers 2 and 3 recommended acceptance. The newly added reviewer 4 gave some comments. Overall positive, and the return was made in mid-December and received directly after 5 days. Very good journal, quick review, strict editorial process, high peer recognition. Definitely a top journal and worth a try. Good luck!

(23) Thank | Anonymous

Author: xxx


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-28 15:46:40
The editorial review time is 20 days, and the reviewer will be reminded at 14 days.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | xxx

Author: 联盟SCI


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-03 02:46:00
望中#The quality of #
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 联盟SCI

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-19 14:49:26
, a little dizzy.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: guopeng.sci


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-04-02 14:43:53
I have to edit the review draft first, and 40% of them are shot down in this session. My first Paper isIn this way, there is no trial at all.The second Paper is more fortunate, and it was sent to the trial. It is said that only 20% of the Papers submitted for review can be accepted. I am faster, and there are revision opinions in less than 2 months. The reviewers don’t have much advice.Modified directly after the change.I feel that the research content (direction) of the first paper must have obvious innovations. It is the Highlight we are talking about. It is better to use some statistical methods, such as PCA, mathematical models, etc., foreigners prefer this, and more explainproblem.I hope everyone will be lucky.
Show Review in Original Language
(14) Thank | guopeng.sci

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-01 15:12:00
The journal is very efficient, although it has been delayed for half a month, but the external trial is less than a month, then the editor returns only comments.It took 3 days.The external review was quite good, pointing out that the main problem was the expression (because the content of the paper was too much, it was easy to get lost), and then the editor gave a major overhaul.It took more than a month to revise, and after resubmission, a notice of acceptance was given in a week.It took more than three months to complete the front and back, and the manuscript was revised over a month.The reviewer is very responsible, the nail is riveting and riveting, and the opinions are very pertinent.The editor is also very good, I accidentally missed a file, sent an email in the past, and quickly made it for me.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-14 17:12:00
is very demanding, about 3 months, it seems to be a little better than Ecology, the impact factor has passed 6, a good publication.At that time, I selectd for one, and a foreigner’s review comments were ok. The result was rejected by the Chinese compatriots and rejected.The reason is that many Chinese articles are not quoted.After rejecting the manuscript, switch to the new phytologist to receive it.This shows the difficulty of this publication.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-25 18:11:00
GCB has a target impact factor of 10 or more, so GCB requirements are almost demanding.Aditor may face five high-quality articles and can only accept one's pressure.Therefore, in addition to the innovation of research, the most basic language, journal requirements (image requirements, reference format...), language logic and other issues are extremely high.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Ecology
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-03-04 23:12:00
“ranked 3rd in the list of most-cited journals in Climate Change Research, 1999-2009(First and second places were Nature and Science respectively)." Industry recognition is high
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*