Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   Impact factor range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 238382 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsENVIRON SCI TECHNOL
ISSN0013-936X
Impact Indicator (2017-2018)H-index: 319

CiteScore: 6.58
Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)13.00%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.acs.org/journal/esthag
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://acs.manuscriptcentral.com/acs
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER CHEMICAL SOC, 1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20036
Subject Area环境科学
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1967
Annual Article Volume1529
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0013-936X%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 2.9 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 80%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY】Impact Factor Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Factor Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY: Write a review
Author: 江湖小生


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-10 15:19:41
Downstairs said that the submission of more than 20,000 is not only wrong with the decimal point, but the first digit is also wrong, terrible.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 江湖小生

Author: yudeyou92@gmail.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-21 12:51:45
5.14Submission, the editor is Dr. John Crittenden, manuscript number 2584, has not changed since now, is it still not in the editor's hand......
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | yudeyou92@gmail.com

Author: leon


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-18 11:35:15
2018 On April 18th, the manuscript number has been more than 2,500. It seems that this magazine is not a little bit hot. I estimate that the volume of manuscripts in the four major parallel journals is not as good as it is!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | leon

Author: 77859


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-04 06:28:38
can only say that the AE in China is simply...I published seven or eighty articles in EST, and the other Chinese scholars made it difficult to review the journals
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 77859

Author: 匿名


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-15 18:01:20
has been submitted for a week, and the status display has not yet been edited by the editor...Efficiency and efficiency ~~~ Let's share the time node of the recent manuscript status change.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 匿名

Author: 123456


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-29 13:19:27
is generally lucky, submitted on 2017-10-14, because the previous format is written according to the journal requirements, so there is no Technician Revison, the editor of the selection is David L. Sedlak, USAPeople do water treatment direction, a wide range of research, EST paper more than a dozen articles; two days later, the editor-in-chief changed to Richard Valentine, after a week of submission into the Review process, this journal did not show the review process, but asked the next generation about a week or so will be submitted for review.Then enter the waiting process.The notice of modification was received on 2017-11-11, and the four reviewers stated that the article was innovative and accepted after revision.Two minor repairs, two overhauls.Supplemental characterization test, modified and returned, 2017-11-16.After receiving the emails of the journal editors one week later, I made some partial revisions. I have to say that the journal editors are very responsible, and the minor errors are repeatedly checked. Three partial revisions were made through emails one week before and after, and 2017-11-29 Accept.The overall feeling of this journal is that the article is more innovative and effective, and the review speed is fast. The editor and editor are very serious.The TOP journals in mind are well deserved, and the journal level should be higher than that of similar environmental journals (this is a glimpse)
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 123456

Author: 99360068@qq.com


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-09 08:28:48
2016 October 25 contribution, two months later, the first trialAs a result, a total of five reviewers put forward a lot of suggestions and questions (very pertinent, very constructive, all opinions and suggestions have a strong reference value), the editor is also very serious and responsible, and oftenTheir holidays have dealt with our manuscripts (the results of the first trial were received at Christmas time) and must be praised!Then began a long process of revision, a total of three major overhauls in the middle, each time the response letter has done a lot of homework and argumentation.Finally received the letter of acceptance on May 3, 2017, and received proof on May 8.Recalling the entire submission process of the past six months, I lost my mind, I passed it, sometimes I didn't want to give birth, I even wanted to give up, but fortunately I finally persisted. The result is good, and I have a lot of exercise for myself.In short, our team likes this magazine very much!
Show Review in Original Language
(48) Thank | 99360068@qq.com

Author: 哈哈民


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-07-26 12:56:56
The direction of toxicology and genetics, submitted in mid-May, minor repair at the end of June, and received after returning.No doubt, ES
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 哈哈民

Author: 烟酒僧


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-05-03 22:57:54
15 submission in August, two or three months before and after the technical review, small repair experiments and characterization, 30 comments, and 15 comments for the second time, in general, the requirementsA lot of
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 烟酒僧

Author: i


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-08 09:22:01
In 2015, ES
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | i

Author: i


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-08 09:21:42
In 2015, ES
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | i

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-21 06:01:00
2014, will publish its sister magazine ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, http://pubs.acs.org/journal/estlcu
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-20 22:12:00
don't know thisThe magazine published letter
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-26 22:40:00
cast an article, the result is unknown
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-25 21:39:00
This magazine quality has been steadily declining over the past few years, and it is not difficult to send a essay on it.There is a deputy editor, Ruben Kretzschmar, who has had several contacts with him during his work in Switzerland. He feels that this person has racial prejudice against the Chinese. Most of the articles about the Chinese as the first author are based on a few excuses.
Show Review in Original Language
(15) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-23 16:07:00
I am very lucky. I have already had two ESTs this year. I am very satisfied with the chemical/water treatment process. This is the dream journal of my reading.The two submissions were very good. The last time I edited was Stephan Hug of ETH, Switzerland. This time it was David Sedlak. I was very responsible. From submission, modification to reception, the last one was 4 months (see me in May).Reviews), this one is 3 months.During the period, David Sedlak also invited me to review two articles similar to my submission.
Show Review in Original Language
(21) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-05 16:48:00
The journals that were voted for were not in the process, and the ES&T was still very serious. Three reviewers were overhauled twice in the middle to receive... and also tossed for 6 months....... Must be patient...
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-15 17:24:00
spent more than 3 months reviewing the manuscript, only looking for 3 reviewers~ two rejected, one did not express, the editor refusedIt is.Both reviewers refused because a feature they thought was important, but did not comment on other results.The trial was very simple, only one or two questions were raised, and no comments were made on most of the research content.I am very disappointed with the EST review. I haven’t said it for so long, and there are only a few questions, and if there is a lack of representation, why should I reject it directly?I am considering argument, I hope I can make a turn.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-10 20:17:00
From submission to hire, the first modification, a total of 4 months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-03 00:11:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-01 20:31:00
The article has been cast for two and a half months, but there is no news!I wrote an e-mail consultation to the presiding judge, and the presiding secretary replied to confirm the review, and hoped to have feedback with all my heart, and did not say the same!Pray, there is good news!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-28 10:26:00
About ES&T, because I have not been engaged in research activities abroad, I have not communicated with foreign scholars on this magazine. I have been submitting this magazine to my own experience over the past 3 years.Talk about my own opinions for your colleagues' reference.As with many people in the country, I also considered ES&T as the top magazine for the environment (currently the Chinese Academy of Sciences has been classified as Zone 1) when I first submitted to ES&T in 2010.In fact, my personal research direction is coal combustion and its pollutant control. The published papers are basically focused on the combustion process in the furnace. The content related to the environmental field is actually relatively small, so the first time I voted for this magazine is to try it.The mentality, because I myself feel that the burning papers may be
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-17 01:55:00
I know the editor-in-chief of this publication. In fact, no one said that it is so unattainable.The Chinese papers are published on the top, and it is not very noticeable.The discipline is too complicated.There are already four Chinese editors, indicating that the publications do not maintain the leading edge of the discipline as before.There is only one Japanese editorial board member.Japan's environmental science is the world's top, indicating that Japanese scholars do not pay much attention to this publication.Today's publications are not very upscale.Chinese papers far exceed Japan's.It gives people the feeling that there has been a tendency to irrigate in recent years.Japanese, Taiwanese scholars do not quite agree with this journal.Mainly the discipline is too complicated.Japan's environmental science is world-class, with good research, generally chooses professional publications, not
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-07 15:12:00
EST as the top magazine in the field of the environment, its influence and the quality of the article are deeply trusted by the people.As a magazine of ACS, the mode of submission is basically the same: 1. Before submitting the manuscript, please read the instructions for submission, http://pubs.acs.org/page/esthag/submission/index.html, which is detailed in the article.Things to be aware of when submitting a manuscript.2. The number of words in the research manuscript is limited to about 7,000 words, but does not include the literature and the header page. The number of words per chart can be estimated by 300 words.3. Need to make a TOC/abstract art legend, which can clearly express the
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-07 10:05:00
of the paper. Who knows the EST submission format?Briefly explain, look at the submission guide did not see clearly
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.