X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION]Hello, you are Visitor Number 178764 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ CLEAN PROD
ISSN0959-6526
E-ISSN1879-1786
h-index150
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
13.101.9372.475
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Business, Management and Accounting
Subcategory: Strategy and Management
Q17 / 440
Category: Business, Management and Accounting
Subcategory: Environmental Science (all)
Q14 / 220
Category: Business, Management and Accounting
Subcategory: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Q18 / 336
Category: Business, Management and Accounting
Subcategory: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Q117 / 195

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)23.80%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30440/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/JCLEPRO
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEnvironmental Science
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1993
Annual Article Volume4059
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0959-6526%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 50%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)
  Reviews on JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION: Write a review
Author: Omair


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-07-10 11:01:34
I saw a lot of news about JCP on the Internet, both good and bad. I would like to share a little bit of my own humble opinion here. Please don’t complain if you don’t like it. I submitted an article to JCP before, and the first review speed was very fast. About two months later the review comments came back. It was a bit scary that there were 6 reviewers, which is the largest number of reviewers and comments I had seen. Reviewers' comments were very pertinent, which also shew that my research ability or writing level was limited, so I got so many comments. This also showed that the journal attached great importance to manuscript review. But one of the reviewers had very sharp opinions and criticized me very much. At the end of his comments, I was asked to refer to (i.e. cite) six articles. I found that the authors were all the same person. This meant that this reviewer asked me to cite his articles. To be honest, this kind of reviewer is annoying. It is said that JCP has a high self-citing rate, but the volume of this journal is also large, and a person who wants to submit to a journal must first know what kind of articles the journal will accept, so I think this is acceptable. Also, the main theme of this journal is clean production and energy, which should be reflected in the introduction and conclusion. So when I wrote it, I referred to many articles reflecting this theme in this journal. If you refer to an article, you have to cite it, which is understandable. Furthermore, I personally feel that there are only good or bad articles but no good or bad journals. If you do like a journal, you can submit to it. If you don't like it, you can submit to something else. Each takes what you need, and finds the suitable one.

(535) Thank | Omair

Author: 木易1


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-06-11 23:28:24
2020.02.01, submitted; 2020.02.06, with editor; 2020.02.09, under review; 2020.02.26, under editor evaluation; 2020.03.08, major revision; 2020.05.09, revision submitted; 2020.05.12, under review; 2020.05.17, required reviews completed; 2020.05.26, decision in process; 2020.05.27, minor revision; 2020.05.27, revision submitted; 2020.05.28, with editor; 2020.06.01, required reviews completed; 2020.06.11, decision in process; 2020.06.11, accept. There were three reviewers, two agreed to accept it, and the other one had sharp words, who raised more than 20 questions and required me to supplement experiments. Thanks to the editors for showing mercy. During the pandemic, the speed was very slow. I logged in every day to check it out. I was anxious. It was finally accepted. Thank you for sharing!

(7) Thank | 木易1

Author: 流落de小奶牛


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-03-20 16:43:30
2019.11.14, submitted; 2019.11.15, with editor; 2019.11.24, under review; 2019.12.11, under review; 2019.12.15, under review; 2019.12.22, under review; 2020.01.11, under editor evaluation; 2020.01.26, major revision; 2020.02.24, revision submitted; 2020.02.25, with editor; 2020.03.01, under review; 2020.03.09, required reviews completed; 2020.03.15, accepted. 2020.03.20, proof. It was the second time to submit to the Journal of Chemical Physics. There were twists and turns in this review. It took more than 2 months to receive the review comments, and it took 4 months from submission to acceptance. The comments of the editor and reviewers were very profound! Thanks to editor Panos Seferlis and the reviewers for their work! I hope this journal will get better and better. If there is progress in energy and environmental, I will submit to it again.

(8) Thank | 流落de小奶牛

Author: Cowadopt


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-07-12 05:42:22
2019-01-25 submitted to journal; 2018-01-26 with editor; 2018-02-05 under review; 2019-03-16 major revision; 2019-04-17 revision submitted to journal; 2019-04-19 with editor; 2019-04-19 under review; 2019-05-07 minor revision; 2019-05-21 revision submitted to journal; 2019-05-22 with editor; 2019-05-22 minor revision; 2019-05-23 revision submitted to journal; 2019-05-24 with editor; 2019-05-27 minor revision; 2019-06-28 revision submitted to journal; 2019-06-30 accept; 2019-07-11 Online. Reviewer comments are very pertinent, but the editor is a bit of problem.

(4) Thank | Cowadopt

Author: yiersan


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-04-21 17:31:30
Actually more than 14 months. 21 Apr 2019 Accepted; 20 Apr 2019 With Editor; 17 Apr 2019 Revision Submitted to Journal; 13 Apr 2019 Minor Revision; 14 Mar 2019 Under Review; 27 Oct 2018 Under Review; 3 Aug 18 Under Review; 2 Aug 18 With Editor; 1 Aug 18 Revision Submitted to Journal; 1 Aug 18 Revision Needs Approval; 1 Aug 18 Building PDF; 12 May 18 Incomplete; 12 May 18 Revise; 12 May 18 Author Declines to Revise; 11 May 18 Revise; 11 May 18 Decision in Process; 29 Jan 18 Under Review; 27 Jan 18 With Editor; 25 Jan 18 Submitted to Journal.

(2) Thank | yiersan

Author: o(∩_∩)o 哈哈


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-15 20:31:27
Five months from submission (May 2018) to accept (Oct 2018). Not bad.

(4) Thank | o(∩_∩)o 哈哈

Author: linwoonleong@gmail.com


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-04-18 20:30:29
JCP is a efficient journal that I ever submitted. First submission on 27/1/2019. Revision submission 0n 1/4/2019, Accepted on 18/4/2019. I am strongly recommended JCP is a good journal to be chosen.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | linwoonleong@gmail.com

Author: linwoonleong@gmail.com


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-04-18 20:30:15
JCP is a efficient journal that I ever submitted. First submission on 27/1/2019. Revision submission 0n 1/4/2019, Accepted on 18/4/2019. I am strongly recommended JCP is a good journal to be chosen.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | linwoonleong@gmail.com

Author: 小鸡


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-21 07:28:15
The review will result in two months, four reviewers, two minor repairs, the other two are negative, but there is no clear rejection of the draft, and then the editor refused..I appealed, but I didn't return the mail.I read other people's submission information, four reviewers, two reviewers clearly rejected the draft, the editor also gave the re-review and re-submitment, and finally.I don’t know why, I’m watching it.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 小鸡

Author: xgly


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-20 14:25:07
The journal has been under review since 2013.1.17. It is still in this state until now. I hope to get good results and hope to be accepted by the journal!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | xgly

Author: lintang


Subject Area: Social Science
Duration of Peer Review: 9.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-18 06:33:04
May, 2018 sent, under review after 10 days, august, 2019 after 2 and half month major revision, 5 reviewers, sent back, after 2 month received minor revision (just format) one reviewer, sent back, after one month minor revision 2 reviewer, then after 0ne month minor revision, then after one month minor revision and prayers goes on in january 2019. one major revision,  3 very minor revisions. very irresponsible journal
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | lintang

Author: 雕刻人生


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-17 21:45:13
9.10 Contributed, 11.5 overhaul; December 22 submitted revised draft, January 8th edited to Xiao Xiu; January 9th submitted revised draft; January 16th received.The entire submission lasted more than 4 months and felt very fast.Thanks to the journal editor and three reviewers.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 雕刻人生

Author: qiangzi


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-19 11:00:16
Is the journal charged?
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | qiangzi

Author: 163杰天地


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-16 14:43:48
The article was accepted last night.It’s a surprise.Change from the second to the first, or top.I want to burn incense.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 163杰天地

Author: 我又不乱来


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-14 09:37:56
Today, I have checked the 1st area, happy, because there is an article on the road., haha!!!
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 我又不乱来

Author: o(∩_∩)o 哈哈


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-13 12:23:17
Admitted an article in mid-October, so...Now I am smashing a section of TOP??Amazing!Still very happy ∀(^∀^●)ノ
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | o(∩_∩)o 哈哈

Author: yudeyou


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-13 08:55:39
This year, I have a 1 section, and there is a road on the road....It was also drunk, and it was initially rejected from Zone 1.....
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | yudeyou

Author: wendalu


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-13 08:51:46
Haha, yes, now it is a district...Specially registered for a review...
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | wendalu

Author: qiangzi


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 9.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-09 16:55:31
This journal is soHigh self-introduction, will not be kicked out?
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | qiangzi

Author: yudeyou


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-29 20:56:25
A tragedy due to the repetition rate problem a month ago, the weight was reduced to re-submitment.11.13 with the editor to the present, it is awkward, the amount of manuscript is not very big!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | yudeyou

Author: NIC


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-08 17:22:24
landlord to do hazardous waste treatment and resource utilization directionSubmitted by 2018.07.242018.07.26 with editor2018.07.28 under review2018.08.06 under editor evalution2018.08.07 revise-major revisionFirst-instance thief is fast, good luck, three reviewers: one reviewer more than a dozen questions, the other on two or three, the third did not evaluate2018.08.17 Submit revision2018.08.18 Chief Editor2018.08.19 Associate Editor2018.09.01 under review2018.10.24 Waited too long, the boss asked to writeSo I wrote a reminder letter and accepted it for a total of three months.2018.10.31 online2018.11.01 proof2018.11.07 final versionI have always been concerned about the dynamics. Secondly, I really benefit from this website.So share it with everyone. HahaI wish jclp is getting better
Show Review in Original Language
(37) Thank | NIC

Author: ck0719


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-29 15:10:34
14 may 2018: Submit17 may 2018: under review15 sep 2018: Overhaul5 oct 2018: Submit7 oct 2018: with editor8 oct 2018: under review20 oct 2018: Overhaul (just three small questions)23 oct 2018: Submit25 oct 2018: accept27 oct 2018: Proof
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | ck0719

Author: 齐德隆东墙


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-20 09:29:09
Welcome to the penguin group discussion: 785268896
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 齐德隆东墙

Author: hebutjzy


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-12 13:52:30
2.7 submitted3.3 revision4.15 resubmitted5.10 accepted5.17 online
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | hebutjzy

Author: SEU-Huang


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-10 15:50:34
. This journal feels that many people in the management science direction are contributing, but the quality of the article isIt’s really not very good, irrigation is more powerful, and one of our articles was rejected by other journals, and the JCP was finally submitted.It is recommended that the brothers in the direction of the tube can select for EJOR, IJPE, IJPR or not. This is not very good in the direction of the tube.
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | SEU-Huang

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)

Start your review of [JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service